Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
I'm a playa from way back and playa's gotta play. I'm straight pimpin'. Southside OG's keep it real. Represent the third coast.
Plummer retired,Simms is staying
Nothing is set in stone yet young grasshopper.
Exactly! What an intelligent, concise article. If they were such good moves, why are we the laughing stocks?
I think we tried to be too slick for our good and could get caught holding the hot potatoe (Plummer). I just can't see the logic behind investing or risking investing this much in the QB position. 5.3 mill in Plummer and 10 mill or so on Garcia and Simms depending on playing time. I can understand the Garcia signing if we thought the Plummer deal was off the table. But once we signed Garcia then Plummer no longer should have been considered. We should now be focusing on the safety and o-line free agents. Instead, we traded for Plummer even though he is disgruntled and doesn't want to play here and is contemplating retirement. I realize we got him at a discount with the conditional pick but why take this gamble? Because we hope to strong arm Houston into trading for Plummer? If they didn't want to give Denver a draft pick for Plummer why would they give us one, especially when they know what we are trying to do. Houston knows we can't afford to have two millionaire QBs on the bench and we'll eventually have to cut somebody. They could just dig their heels in and wait us out. Plummer could force our hand by showing up to camp and adding his 5.3 cap hit on the books. You really think he is going to be willing to restructure after all this? If we dont cut any of them and can't pull off a trade, we're stuck with a huge chunk of our cap devoted to th QB position, with multiple millionaire QBs on the bench. Not the best use of cap space to me. I know gruden likes to collect QBs but this is ridiculous. I suppose locking up the top FA QBs forces teams like Oakland, Detroit and Cleveland to focus on Russell and Quinn instead of CJ. That's a positive point. But I don't think that positive point outweighs the potential salary cap ramifications of this move. I've heard some of you say that other teams devote 10-15 mill annually into their QB position except they do so primarily with one franchise guy (Manning, Brees, Palmer, Brady, etc) and a few slappies behind them. That is a a decent point. But with those franchise QBs starting, winning games and going to Pro Bowls, those teams are getting a good return on their investments. Most of that big money is on the field contributing for them. If we cant pull off a deal, we'll spread 10-15 mill amongst three guys who are AT BEST middle of the pack QBs in this league. 2/3 of them gathering dust holding clipboards too. See the difference?
Quote from: All_da_way on March 04, 2007, 10:45:40 AMNothing is set in stone yet young grasshopper. Plummer's website says different.....http://www.jakeplummerfoundation.org/
I live in Houston and I can tell you both the media and the fans are bashing the Texans and praising the Bucs. The guy on the news last night led off the sports by saying all the Texans QB hopes are up to the Bucs and they will now have to pay alot more than they would have to the Broncos. This will really look like a great deal if any starters go down during training camp. The first team any QB hungry team will turn to is us and at that point we'll really get a good return.
The only negative about the deal is if Plummer calls Bruce Allen's bluff and reports for Bucs camp. The Bucs lose a 4th rounder. But I seriously doubt Plummer will report. Even if he does, the Bucs can throw him on the reserve list and minimize his cap value.
Well RPC according to Clayton no retirement papers have been filed. The grill is heating up ladies and gentlement.