Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: jaybuc88 on March 24, 2010, 03:34:54 PMQuote from: Dy-nasty D on March 24, 2010, 03:32:54 PMThe poor drafting started before 2001, but, most teams don't draft well. Teams that draft well usually are fortunate enough to hit on a few and it makes the other talent drafted around them look better. That's my point to base building your team just on the draft is stupid..periodWell then I guess we stupidly won a SB in 2002 because the base was built via the draft.
Quote from: Dy-nasty D on March 24, 2010, 03:32:54 PMThe poor drafting started before 2001, but, most teams don't draft well. Teams that draft well usually are fortunate enough to hit on a few and it makes the other talent drafted around them look better. That's my point to base building your team just on the draft is stupid..period
The poor drafting started before 2001, but, most teams don't draft well. Teams that draft well usually are fortunate enough to hit on a few and it makes the other talent drafted around them look better.
Quote from: PWNASAURUS on March 24, 2010, 03:38:38 PMQuote from: jaybuc88 on March 24, 2010, 03:34:54 PMQuote from: Dy-nasty D on March 24, 2010, 03:32:54 PMThe poor drafting started before 2001, but, most teams don't draft well. Teams that draft well usually are fortunate enough to hit on a few and it makes the other talent drafted around them look better. That's my point to base building your team just on the draft is stupid..periodWell then I guess we stupidly won a SB in 2002 because the base was built via the draft.JUST the draft...you have to have both FA and drafted players to win, just like we did when we won the Super Bowl in 2002
Our 2002 SB team was 50/50.
Quote from: ktownbuc47 on March 24, 2010, 05:58:57 PMOur 2002 SB team was 50/50.Close, but not exactly.12 drafted5 undrafted9 FA1 tradeI'm willing to bet the other SB winning teams had ratios of 70%+/30%-
Quote from: Doug09 on March 24, 2010, 06:20:27 PMQuote from: ktownbuc47 on March 24, 2010, 05:58:57 PMOur 2002 SB team was 50/50.Close, but not exactly.12 drafted5 undrafted9 FA1 tradeI'm willing to bet the other SB winning teams had ratios of 70%+/30%-12 drafted out of 22 starters is closer to 50%. I don't believe any of the undrafted started with the Bucs, they were pickups.
Quote from: ktownbuc47 on March 24, 2010, 06:39:47 PMQuote from: Doug09 on March 24, 2010, 06:20:27 PMQuote from: ktownbuc47 on March 24, 2010, 05:58:57 PMOur 2002 SB team was 50/50.Close, but not exactly.12 drafted5 undrafted9 FA1 tradeI'm willing to bet the other SB winning teams had ratios of 70%+/30%-12 drafted out of 22 starters is closer to 50%. I don't believe any of the undrafted started with the Bucs, they were pickups.The 2002 Bucs are a little different because that was the last gasp of a run. That team was 5 years after the run started when a lot of the original players got old, role players too expensive, and they were continually picking outside the top 15 and thus missing out on prime players to replenish the roster. The 1997 that got the ball rolling boasted 17 of 22 starters as homegrown and the 1999 also had 17 of 22 starters who had only ever been Bucs.