Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
I guess she should have gone the safer route and gone to the prom, get hammered, and get pregnant like every other teenager.
Quote from: Skull and Bones on June 11, 2010, 05:57:38 PMno one said she didn't know what she was doing but as a minor her parents are responsible for her and it probably wasn't the smartest thing for them to allow.Quote from: Incognito on June 11, 2010, 06:02:12 PM^^Yep.Being "qualified" doesn't mean she's not in great danger out there.So she shouldn't be allowed to drive a car since there is "great danger out there"
no one said she didn't know what she was doing but as a minor her parents are responsible for her and it probably wasn't the smartest thing for them to allow.
^^Yep.Being "qualified" doesn't mean she's not in great danger out there.
(Abby's brother Zac, who completed his voyage at 17, briefly held the distinction as being the youngest sailor to solo-circumnavigate the planet but he made several stops.)
Illuminator is a good poster. He sticks to his guns and makes good points. Some don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'t like that.
Quote from: cyberdude557 on March 29, 2010, 05:45:07 PM(Abby's brother Zac, who completed his voyage at 17, briefly held the distinction as being the youngest sailor to solo-circumnavigate the planet but he made several stops.)Strange that I hadn't noticed this the first time around. Does this change your impression of this family's parenting ability?
Not specifically addressed to you, just a general question. Many people seemed to think that these parents were negligent for letting their sixteen year old girl make this attempt, and I was wondering if the fact that they already had a child successfully complete the voyage had changed their opinion on the subject. Oh, and it wasn't "Daddy's sailboat," he purchased it with his own funds.
Quote from: Illuminator on February 08, 2011, 11:07:26 PMNot specifically addressed to you, just a general question. Many people seemed to think that these parents were negligent for letting their sixteen year old girl make this attempt, and I was wondering if the fact that they already had a child successfully complete the voyage had changed their opinion on the subject. Oh, and it wasn't "Daddy's sailboat," he purchased it with his own funds.He bought it himself, wow, just shows more maturity for the kid I guess. But you appear so frustrated with someone who has actually complimented you and agrees with you in certain spots. Relax, everything will be OK. To answer your question, is it criminal? Thats for the courts to decide. Is it irresponsible for the parents to let them? Well, you need to know more about the kid I guess. I can't see myself ever agreeing to it. And I guess the penalty to the parents if they were wrong was the loss of the child. Harsh yes, but also realistic. But since the parents did ensure she had the proper training, had the proper safety equipment and had the proper what ever other stuff she would need, then no they were not irresponsible. (If they failed to do that they are, I'm not gonna go read this whole thread to find out). Maybe not wise, but not irresponsible IMHO.
Quote from: SepeBucs on February 08, 2011, 11:28:00 PMQuote from: Illuminator on February 08, 2011, 11:07:26 PMNot specifically addressed to you, just a general question. Many people seemed to think that these parents were negligent for letting their sixteen year old girl make this attempt, and I was wondering if the fact that they already had a child successfully complete the voyage had changed their opinion on the subject. Oh, and it wasn't "Daddy's sailboat," he purchased it with his own funds.He bought it himself, wow, just shows more maturity for the kid I guess. But you appear so frustrated with someone who has actually complimented you and agrees with you in certain spots. Relax, everything will be OK. To answer your question, is it criminal? Thats for the courts to decide. Is it irresponsible for the parents to let them? Well, you need to know more about the kid I guess. I can't see myself ever agreeing to it. And I guess the penalty to the parents if they were wrong was the loss of the child. Harsh yes, but also realistic. But since the parents did ensure she had the proper training, had the proper safety equipment and had the proper what ever other stuff she would need, then no they were not irresponsible. (If they failed to do that they are, I'm not gonna go read this whole thread to find out). Maybe not wise, but not irresponsible IMHO.The only thing more sickening than Illuminator's posts is watching SepticTankBuc KISS HIS RUMP!
Quote from: Mean D on February 09, 2011, 12:16:11 AMQuote from: SepeBucs on February 08, 2011, 11:28:00 PMQuote from: Illuminator on February 08, 2011, 11:07:26 PMNot specifically addressed to you, just a general question. Many people seemed to think that these parents were negligent for letting their sixteen year old girl make this attempt, and I was wondering if the fact that they already had a child successfully complete the voyage had changed their opinion on the subject. Oh, and it wasn't "Daddy's sailboat," he purchased it with his own funds.He bought it himself, wow, just shows more maturity for the kid I guess. But you appear so frustrated with someone who has actually complimented you and agrees with you in certain spots. Relax, everything will be OK. To answer your question, is it criminal? Thats for the courts to decide. Is it irresponsible for the parents to let them? Well, you need to know more about the kid I guess. I can't see myself ever agreeing to it. And I guess the penalty to the parents if they were wrong was the loss of the child. Harsh yes, but also realistic. But since the parents did ensure she had the proper training, had the proper safety equipment and had the proper what ever other stuff she would need, then no they were not irresponsible. (If they failed to do that they are, I'm not gonna go read this whole thread to find out). Maybe not wise, but not irresponsible IMHO.The only thing more sickening than Illuminator's posts is watching SepticTankBuc KISS HIS RUMP!LOL, internet bullies, your just so cute! Again, pathetic, but cute.
Quote from: SepeBucs on February 09, 2011, 12:18:48 AMQuote from: Mean D on February 09, 2011, 12:16:11 AMQuote from: SepeBucs on February 08, 2011, 11:28:00 PMQuote from: Illuminator on February 08, 2011, 11:07:26 PMNot specifically addressed to you, just a general question. Many people seemed to think that these parents were negligent for letting their sixteen year old girl make this attempt, and I was wondering if the fact that they already had a child successfully complete the voyage had changed their opinion on the subject. Oh, and it wasn't "Daddy's sailboat," he purchased it with his own funds.He bought it himself, wow, just shows more maturity for the kid I guess. But you appear so frustrated with someone who has actually complimented you and agrees with you in certain spots. Relax, everything will be OK. To answer your question, is it criminal? Thats for the courts to decide. Is it irresponsible for the parents to let them? Well, you need to know more about the kid I guess. I can't see myself ever agreeing to it. And I guess the penalty to the parents if they were wrong was the loss of the child. Harsh yes, but also realistic. But since the parents did ensure she had the proper training, had the proper safety equipment and had the proper what ever other stuff she would need, then no they were not irresponsible. (If they failed to do that they are, I'm not gonna go read this whole thread to find out). Maybe not wise, but not irresponsible IMHO.The only thing more sickening than Illuminator's posts is watching SepticTankBuc KISS HIS RUMP!LOL, internet bullies, your just so cute! Again, pathetic, but cute.There is no such thing as an internet bully, unless perhaps you are truly a weak, scared loser. I will never do any physical harm to you. But I do think you are a butt kissing coward.