Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: CyberDilemma on April 05, 2010, 04:41:25 PMQuote from: Escobar on April 05, 2010, 03:41:48 PMIf we scrap this ridiculous time share that Raheem "brilliantly" thought up, he will play very well. How is it that I know Carnell plays better the more carries he gets, yet Raheem and his dopey group of frauds don't know it? It's fact that Carnell gets stronger as the game goes on, his second half splits in ypc, td's, and total yards are all higher than his first half numbers. We either need to trust he will stay healthy and give him 20+ carries EVERY game, or we need to trade him, period. No sense in keeping him around if we aren't going to use him properly.If Raheem does happen to stumble across the "how to use Carnell" chapter in his Football for Dummies book, then I can easily see him surpassing his rookie totals in every category. Especially against this weak schedule we have this year. 1800 total yards and 12-15 total td's is realistic. Every single time they've tried to place the whole load on Caddy, he breaks before the end of the season.So if we had given him "starter" carries last year, he would have definitely gotten hurt? Spare me Ms. Cleo. Carnell ran very well last year and even expressed frustration regarding his lack of playing time. That means he was feeling good and could have been used more. As I said, if we don't feel he will remain healthy (which you seem to be insinuating) then we need to trade him for whatever we can. Feed the ball to our overpriced FA "prize" of last year and draft a RB in a few weeks.
Quote from: Escobar on April 05, 2010, 03:41:48 PMIf we scrap this ridiculous time share that Raheem "brilliantly" thought up, he will play very well. How is it that I know Carnell plays better the more carries he gets, yet Raheem and his dopey group of frauds don't know it? It's fact that Carnell gets stronger as the game goes on, his second half splits in ypc, td's, and total yards are all higher than his first half numbers. We either need to trust he will stay healthy and give him 20+ carries EVERY game, or we need to trade him, period. No sense in keeping him around if we aren't going to use him properly.If Raheem does happen to stumble across the "how to use Carnell" chapter in his Football for Dummies book, then I can easily see him surpassing his rookie totals in every category. Especially against this weak schedule we have this year. 1800 total yards and 12-15 total td's is realistic. Every single time they've tried to place the whole load on Caddy, he breaks before the end of the season.
If we scrap this ridiculous time share that Raheem "brilliantly" thought up, he will play very well. How is it that I know Carnell plays better the more carries he gets, yet Raheem and his dopey group of frauds don't know it? It's fact that Carnell gets stronger as the game goes on, his second half splits in ypc, td's, and total yards are all higher than his first half numbers. We either need to trust he will stay healthy and give him 20+ carries EVERY game, or we need to trade him, period. No sense in keeping him around if we aren't going to use him properly.If Raheem does happen to stumble across the "how to use Carnell" chapter in his Football for Dummies book, then I can easily see him surpassing his rookie totals in every category. Especially against this weak schedule we have this year. 1800 total yards and 12-15 total td's is realistic.
Quote from: Escobar on April 05, 2010, 06:03:41 PMQuote from: CyberDilemma on April 05, 2010, 04:41:25 PMQuote from: Escobar on April 05, 2010, 03:41:48 PMIf we scrap this ridiculous time share that Raheem "brilliantly" thought up, he will play very well. How is it that I know Carnell plays better the more carries he gets, yet Raheem and his dopey group of frauds don't know it? It's fact that Carnell gets stronger as the game goes on, his second half splits in ypc, td's, and total yards are all higher than his first half numbers. We either need to trust he will stay healthy and give him 20+ carries EVERY game, or we need to trade him, period. No sense in keeping him around if we aren't going to use him properly.If Raheem does happen to stumble across the "how to use Carnell" chapter in his Football for Dummies book, then I can easily see him surpassing his rookie totals in every category. Especially against this weak schedule we have this year. 1800 total yards and 12-15 total td's is realistic. Every single time they've tried to place the whole load on Caddy, he breaks before the end of the season.So if we had given him "starter" carries last year, he would have definitely gotten hurt? Spare me Ms. Cleo. Carnell ran very well last year and even expressed frustration regarding his lack of playing time. That means he was feeling good and could have been used more. As I said, if we don't feel he will remain healthy (which you seem to be insinuating) then we need to trade him for whatever we can. Feed the ball to our overpriced FA "prize" of last year and draft a RB in a few weeks. Until the guy can prove he can carry the load, he has to be treated with kid gloves.
How is it possible to prove it if you aren't given the chance?
Quote from: Escobar on April 05, 2010, 10:49:23 PMHow is it possible to prove it if you aren't given the chance? Never given the chance?
The guy never even really was who he was his rookie year. He's never had back to back 100 yard games since the 3rd game of his rookie year. Heck even in those first 3 games the second game was his "good" game because in the first game other than that 71 yard run he was doing not much of anything. In the third game it was 37 carries to get his yards.To me there's no rookie year to get back to.
Glad you posted that...... I didn't wanna go there and be seen as "Hatin'"
The guy would draw zero trade interest.....IMO, of course.
Quote from: "Hate" on April 05, 2010, 11:26:36 PMThe guy would draw zero trade interest.....IMO, of course.We traded Alex Smith for a 5th rounder I believe. You mean to tell me you think he has more value to a team than Carnell?
Quote from: "Hate" on April 05, 2010, 11:00:19 PMQuote from: Escobar on April 05, 2010, 10:49:23 PMHow is it possible to prove it if you aren't given the chance? Never given the chance?Literally every season Williams was made the feature back, he didn't make it through the year unscathed. The one year he splits the carries, he plays all 16 games. That can't be a coincidence.