Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
I'll go with Galloway. He's been the most productive. I think he's really been the bright spot for the team this year while everyone else has been struggling.
I don't see how Bruce gets MVP, he has only played 2 games up to this point. Caddy has been non-existent at times, although it probably isn't all his fault. Galloway was non-existent against the Ravens, but has been pretty solid ever since. However, Galloway DID drop a possible TD pass in the Saints game that would have likely won it for us. MVP players don't do that. Bryant has been miserable. None of the other WR have been consistent. Bidwell has probably been one of the more consistent players so far, but can you really give the MVP to a punter? AD has vastly improved from last year when he was a turnstyle at times. Buenning has fallen off the face of the planet. None of the other O-linemen have given anything as far as consistent production goes. Pretty much the entire defense has been shaky at times. I don't see anyone on that side of the ball standing out and taking a claim as the team MVP. For that, I will go with the one player who has shown up pretty consistently, week in and week out, and performed at a high level. You could also call him the most improved player from last year. His name is Anthony Davis. After a few more games that may change to Bruce; but up to this point playing 2 out of 5 games, no matter how well you played, does not make you team MVP.
Anthony Davis, hes been solid pretty much all year. Kudos to AD, rags to riches.
Quote from: InChuckyItrust on October 20, 2006, 02:14:45 PMAnthony Davis, hes been solid pretty much all year. Kudos to AD, rags to riches.Ditto....Anthony Davis.
I have a hard time giving the MVP to Galloway, consider the fact that he had 0 catches in week one, and 1 catch in week three for 8 yards... Are those the numbers of an MVP to a team that is 1-5???Grads has been our difference maker to this point. His first game, he allowed us the chance to win (freaking Reggie Bush and freaking special teams....uggghhh!), and in his 2nd start we actually won the game...I find it hard to give the MVP to a guy who only started 2 of 6 games, but without him, odds are we are 0-6.Bruce is our MVP!
Quote from: TURBO on October 21, 2006, 02:10:12 PMI have a hard time giving the MVP to Galloway, consider the fact that he had 0 catches in week one, and 1 catch in week three for 8 yards... Are those the numbers of an MVP to a team that is 1-5???Grads has been our difference maker to this point. His first game, he allowed us the chance to win (freaking Reggie Bush and freaking special teams....uggghhh!), and in his 2nd start we actually won the game...I find it hard to give the MVP to a guy who only started 2 of 6 games, but without him, odds are we are 0-6.Bruce is our MVP!That is more along the lines I was thinking.And given the pounding Simms took in the first few games, and the total lack of a run game, it is hard for me to justify AD being the MVP on the Bucs. The Bucs hardly had 100 yards rushing the first three games, and considering Davis' forte is run blocking, I can't see him being the MVP of anything. He is improved the last two games, but that is all. He might get the most improved player award, not the most valuable.Bruce has been a catlyst. Not the total package, but a catlyst. The offense looks more fluid, the defense is better rested, and yes, based on two games, I can easily give Grads the MVP trophy, as of now. The two games he has been there, he has made a difference.And half of his appearance have resulted in the only win for the team. That is our MVP, easily.