Welcome, Guest
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Tanard Jackson's TD that was not « previous next »
Page: 1

Morgan

User is banned from postingMuted
*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 14658
Offline
: October 22, 2007, 12:44:19 PM

Disagree with the Kitna call.

The ball was coming out of his hand. He wasn't throwing it. Look at it in slow mo.



It did look like he was trying to hold back the throw.   So many bad breaks for the Bucs yesterday. The ball rarely bounced in their direction.  They definitely were the better team, IMO.

Uncle Stan

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 17312
Offline
#1 : October 22, 2007, 10:57:41 AM

Disagree with the Kitna call.

The ball was coming out of his hand. He wasn't throwing it. Look at it in slow mo.


Learn to disagree without being disagreeable-Ronald Reagan circa 1981

finnbluebucs

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 5063
Offline
#2 : October 22, 2007, 10:50:27 AM

Yeah seen the play. No controversy at all.

\"We are frustrated at not making the playoffs. It is a good start. That is all it is. It is a good start for something that we are going to be in the future. - Josh Freeman

thanson

****
Starter

Posts : 811
Offline
#3 : October 22, 2007, 09:04:52 AM

Like I said it before Tanard Jackson is a real sleeper.   




Guest
#4 : October 21, 2007, 09:58:18 PM

:(

umguy1999

*
Practice Squad

Posts : 0
Offline
#5 : October 21, 2007, 05:56:33 PM

Anyone who saw it knew it was going to be reversed. They may have gotten the one with Garcia wrong, I could not tell if he tucked it or not the camera was at his back, but when it happend I thought for sure it was a fumble, on Kitna's it was obvious he threw it on the ground.

finnbluebucs

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 5063
Offline
#6 : October 21, 2007, 05:53:04 PM

OK then. thanks

\"We are frustrated at not making the playoffs. It is a good start. That is all it is. It is a good start for something that we are going to be in the future. - Josh Freeman

ufojoe

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 28675
Offline
#7 : October 21, 2007, 05:51:47 PM

I can't believe the refs called it a fumble because it was so obvious.

finnbluebucs

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 5063
Offline
#8 : October 21, 2007, 05:37:00 PM

I didn't see the game but according to nfl. com:

8-J.Kitna scrambles to TB 23 for -7 yards. FUMBLES, RECOVERED by TB-28-T.Jackson at TB 21. 28-T.Jackson for 79 yards, TOUCHDOWN. Play Challenged by DET and REVERSED. 8-J.Kitna pass incomplete short middle to 84-S.McDonald.

Did the officials get this one right?

\"We are frustrated at not making the playoffs. It is a good start. That is all it is. It is a good start for something that we are going to be in the future. - Josh Freeman

mjs020294

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 2245
Offline
#9 : October 21, 2007, 05:37:22 PM

YES


gone

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 9244
Offline
#10 : October 21, 2007, 05:38:24 PM

clearly not a fumble.

John Galt?

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 18831
Offline
#11 : October 22, 2007, 11:48:17 AM

My question is, the non-fumble was the result of a very good pass rush, why did it disappear?

Page: 1
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Tanard Jackson's TD that was not « previous next »
:

Hide Tools Show Tools