Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
How is he even still on this roster?
He's not taking reps from anybody. He's running with the 3rd stringers and getting out performed by Terrence Nunn.
Quote from: bizkitlimped on August 10, 2010, 12:07:16 AMHe's not taking reps from anybody. He's running with the 3rd stringers and getting out performed by Terrence Nunn.I rather have Preston Parker and Brooks getting reps over Clayton.
Quote from: chazmoney3 on August 10, 2010, 12:09:53 AMQuote from: bizkitlimped on August 10, 2010, 12:07:16 AMHe's not taking reps from anybody. He's running with the 3rd stringers and getting out performed by Terrence Nunn.I rather have Preston Parker and Brooks getting reps over Clayton.As much as it pains me to say it, Clayton is better than both of them.
Clayton is still a top 6 receiver on this team...cutting him "just to do it" would be foolish...I'm glad a lot of you guys aren't GM's.
A Clayton apologist would have told us all about how he should be a starting WR, no one did that in this thread. He's taking snaps with people of his caliber... the crap team. If he's tied for the worst spot with 2 other WR's, who's going to get that last spot? The guy they already invested a lot of money in to. If Clayton was running with the 1st team, that would be a legitimate problem. But he isn't.
Quote from: Doug09 on August 10, 2010, 12:58:22 AMA Clayton apologist would have told us all about how he should be a starting WR, no one did that in this thread. He's taking snaps with people of his caliber... the crap team. If he's tied for the worst spot with 2 other WR's, who's going to get that last spot? The guy they already invested a lot of money in to. If Clayton was running with the 1st team, that would be a legitimate problem. But he isn't.The Glazers got rid of Bryant for a subpar 9 million dollar season, they can do the same with Mike Clayton.
Quote from: NavyBuc93 on August 10, 2010, 01:01:26 AMQuote from: Doug09 on August 10, 2010, 12:58:22 AMA Clayton apologist would have told us all about how he should be a starting WR, no one did that in this thread. He's taking snaps with people of his caliber... the crap team. If he's tied for the worst spot with 2 other WR's, who's going to get that last spot? The guy they already invested a lot of money in to. If Clayton was running with the 1st team, that would be a legitimate problem. But he isn't.The Glazers got rid of Bryant for a subpar 9 million dollar season, they can do the same with Mike Clayton. How much was Bryant owed by the Bucs for this year on forward? And was his "subpar" season the real reason why he wasn't kept?
Quote from: Doug09 on August 10, 2010, 12:58:22 AMA Clayton apologist would have told us all about how he should be a starting WR, no one did that in this thread. He's taking snaps with people of his caliber... the crap team. If he's tied for the worst spot with 2 other WR's, who's going to get that last spot? The guy they already invested a lot of money in to. If Clayton was running with the 1st team, that would be a legitimate problem. But he isn't.Mike WilliamsArrelious BennSammie StroughterMaurice StovallReggie BrownMicheal Spurlock ( Seems this guy is making plays every day in TC, not to mention his benefit as a PR/KR)What has Parker, Clayton, or any of the scrubs done?The Glazers got rid of Bryant for a subpar 9 million dollar season, they can do the same with Mike Clayton. Besides thats money SAVED in the long run. To the tune of 15 million.