Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Put him at Safety since he loves the contact so much, and get something for the money he's earning. He'll probably have just as many interceptions as he's had receptions!
Quote from: heyman_BUCu! on August 11, 2010, 08:48:12 AMPut him at Safety since he loves the contact so much, and get something for the money he's earning. He'll probably have just as many interceptions as he's had receptions!� I'd take 35 interceptions from the safety position....
Put him at Safety since he loves the contact so much, and get something for the money he's earning. He'll probably have just as many interceptions as he's had receptions!�
No one here is defending clayton. Nobody has said he's the best receiver on the team, or that this is the year he's finally gonna go back to rookie form. All anyone has said is that even though he'll never be the same receiver that he was, he still isn't worse than 6 other receivers on this team. Plus he's still a great blocker, and he'll be eating up 5 million in cap whether he's on this team or not. We might as well keep him and utilize what he gives us in certain situations as a blocker and 3rd or 4th target at receiver. I don't like clayton at all...But you guys are the ones who are biased...you let your personal hate for him make him out to be worse than he is.
Quote from: Incognito on August 10, 2010, 07:19:04 PMQuote from: barberandbrooks on August 10, 2010, 07:07:14 PMQuote from: Incognito on August 10, 2010, 07:03:24 PMForget the money. Just drop the loser. Thats what I'd do. He's the worst WR I've ever laid eyes on. Hellen Keller could make more catches than Clayton. Stephen Hawking could as well.Thought you were serious at first but i'm liking the sarcasmI wasn't being sarcastic man.He is a Clayton lover/apologist. Either this is Clayton or he is related to Clayton or something. Nobody can make the argument to keep Clayton at all.
Quote from: barberandbrooks on August 10, 2010, 07:07:14 PMQuote from: Incognito on August 10, 2010, 07:03:24 PMForget the money. Just drop the loser. Thats what I'd do. He's the worst WR I've ever laid eyes on. Hellen Keller could make more catches than Clayton. Stephen Hawking could as well.Thought you were serious at first but i'm liking the sarcasmI wasn't being sarcastic man.
Quote from: Incognito on August 10, 2010, 07:03:24 PMForget the money. Just drop the loser. Thats what I'd do. He's the worst WR I've ever laid eyes on. Hellen Keller could make more catches than Clayton. Stephen Hawking could as well.Thought you were serious at first but i'm liking the sarcasm
Forget the money. Just drop the loser. Thats what I'd do. He's the worst WR I've ever laid eyes on. Hellen Keller could make more catches than Clayton. Stephen Hawking could as well.
One season does not a career make.
Quote from: Got Spleen? on August 12, 2010, 10:46:59 AMOne season does not a career make.No, it doesn't. When did I ever say it did. I am just saying at least Clayton had a productive season while Stovall has never done crap.
Quote from: BucsRule80 on August 12, 2010, 01:08:40 PMQuote from: Got Spleen? on August 12, 2010, 10:46:59 AMOne season does not a career make.No, it doesn't. When did I ever say it did. I am just saying at least Clayton had a productive season while Stovall has never done crap.Who has more upside? And who was buried on the depth chart under Joey Galloway and Ike Hilliard while Stovall was playing?
Quote from: NavyBuc93 on August 12, 2010, 01:10:25 PMQuote from: BucsRule80 on August 12, 2010, 01:08:40 PMQuote from: Got Spleen? on August 12, 2010, 10:46:59 AMOne season does not a career make.No, it doesn't. When did I ever say it did. I am just saying at least Clayton had a productive season while Stovall has never done crap.Who has more upside? And who was buried on the depth chart under Joey Galloway and Ike Hilliard while Stovall was playing?Honestly, I think Clayton has more upside. I don't see Stovall ever being a good WR. Other than having good size, he really has nothing else going for him. Clayton has showed me more than Stovall has. I know he will probably never be any good again, but there still is a chance. With Stovall, I really don't think there is a chance of him turning into much of a WR.
Quote from: BucsRule80 on August 12, 2010, 01:19:07 PMQuote from: NavyBuc93 on August 12, 2010, 01:10:25 PMQuote from: BucsRule80 on August 12, 2010, 01:08:40 PMQuote from: Got Spleen? on August 12, 2010, 10:46:59 AMOne season does not a career make.No, it doesn't. When did I ever say it did. I am just saying at least Clayton had a productive season while Stovall has never done crap.Who has more upside? And who was buried on the depth chart under Joey Galloway and Ike Hilliard while Stovall was playing?Honestly, I think Clayton has more upside. I don't see Stovall ever being a good WR. Other than having good size, he really has nothing else going for him. Clayton has showed me more than Stovall has. I know he will probably never be any good again, but there still is a chance. With Stovall, I really don't think there is a chance of him turning into much of a WR.John Goodman has more upside that Clayton.
Deserving of such harshness and bitterness---no.