|
|
FortMyersDave

 Pro Bowler
    
Posts : 1155
|
 |
« #16 : August 25, 2010, 05:48:52 PM »
|
|
I am in a league that is as follows: QB, 2WR, 2RB, TE, Flex WR/RB/TE, Flex QB/RB/TE/WR, K, Defense and 6 bench slots. League is 12 team and is in a ppr format with the QB getting 0.25pt per completion, otherwise it has standard Yahoo values. The QB in the flex position: should it make me push my QB picks higher up in my draft, perhaps getting 2 QB's in the first 5 or 6 rounds and bumping RB's back a bit as there are so many more to pick from. Having 2 QB's on the active roster can give one a ton of points but if one has a bad bad day it can also sting. Just curious if anyone has advice or has been in a league where the QB has been a flex option! Thanks y'all!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FortMyersDave

 Pro Bowler
    
Posts : 1155
|
 |
« #24 : August 31, 2010, 08:35:09 PM »
|
|
I would go for two top QB's... or go for one top QB and wait and take a flier on a low risk high reward guy like Kevin Kolb / Jay Cutler....
I went first and bit into the taking QB's early: Buccaneer Fanatic 1. (1) Drew Brees 2. (20) Calvin Johnson 3. (21) Tom Brady 4. (40) Marques Colston 5. (41) Steve Smith 6. (60) Beanie Wells 7. (61) Jay Cutler 8. (80) Felix Jones 9. (81) Heath Miller 10. (100) Justin Forsett 11. (101) New York Jets 12. (120) Steve Breaston 13. (121) Kellen Winslow 14. (140) Donald Brown 15. (141) Kenny Britt 16. (160) Chris Chambers 17. (161) Lawrence Tynes A few other people went traditional with 2 RBs early and a couple ran on QB's early like I did.. Projections for the teams with the stronger QB's and the strong RB teams even out in the early matchups.Tthough a couple of the 10 teams are very very thin at QB which makes trade bait for me after the first couple of bye weeks..... Got the Jets at round 11 because my DSL went down for a few minutes via T-Storm while I was picking.... [banghead] but I am okay with my team as I was eyeing Breaston at 110 and still got him the next round.. Thanks for the ideas everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|