Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
FSU is hardly a top 20 program anymore, much less a top 5, OBF. I dunno where you get that from.
Quote from: Snook on December 01, 2009, 09:48:53 PMQuote from: BucsBullsBolts on December 01, 2009, 09:36:29 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 01, 2009, 09:56:07 AMQuote from: OregonBucFan on December 01, 2009, 01:29:00 AMQuote from: awitron on December 01, 2009, 12:59:45 AMFSU is hardly a top 20 program anymore, much less a top 5, OBF. I dunno where you get that from.They have a state full of talent. They have players in that state that want to play there. They have a good fan base and what I understand good facilities. They play in a conference they can dominate. 1)Florida/USC2) Texas3) ?You could turn FSU around very fastTop 5... as in places to coach.If all you have to be is in a state full of talent UCLA and Texas A&M would be great jobs. It can easily be argued that being the top dog in a second tier talent state like UGA, Alabama, LSU, Ohio State, and Oklahoma, is better than being second fiddle to an undisputed hegemon in a first tier talent state behind UF, Texas, and USC. UF did pretty good back when FSU was the undisputed hegemon .... The talent pool in Florida has shown yo be plenty large enough to sustain 3 top notch programs, although the difference now is that you've got other Div 1 programs in the state to bleed off some of the talent that would have otherwise provided the depth for the Big 3.And more scholarship restrictions...That too .... although when did they actually start those restrictions?
Quote from: BucsBullsBolts on December 01, 2009, 09:36:29 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on December 01, 2009, 09:56:07 AMQuote from: OregonBucFan on December 01, 2009, 01:29:00 AMQuote from: awitron on December 01, 2009, 12:59:45 AMFSU is hardly a top 20 program anymore, much less a top 5, OBF. I dunno where you get that from.They have a state full of talent. They have players in that state that want to play there. They have a good fan base and what I understand good facilities. They play in a conference they can dominate. 1)Florida/USC2) Texas3) ?You could turn FSU around very fastTop 5... as in places to coach.If all you have to be is in a state full of talent UCLA and Texas A&M would be great jobs. It can easily be argued that being the top dog in a second tier talent state like UGA, Alabama, LSU, Ohio State, and Oklahoma, is better than being second fiddle to an undisputed hegemon in a first tier talent state behind UF, Texas, and USC. UF did pretty good back when FSU was the undisputed hegemon .... The talent pool in Florida has shown yo be plenty large enough to sustain 3 top notch programs, although the difference now is that you've got other Div 1 programs in the state to bleed off some of the talent that would have otherwise provided the depth for the Big 3.And more scholarship restrictions...
Quote from: Feel Real Good on December 01, 2009, 09:56:07 AMQuote from: OregonBucFan on December 01, 2009, 01:29:00 AMQuote from: awitron on December 01, 2009, 12:59:45 AMFSU is hardly a top 20 program anymore, much less a top 5, OBF. I dunno where you get that from.They have a state full of talent. They have players in that state that want to play there. They have a good fan base and what I understand good facilities. They play in a conference they can dominate. 1)Florida/USC2) Texas3) ?You could turn FSU around very fastTop 5... as in places to coach.If all you have to be is in a state full of talent UCLA and Texas A&M would be great jobs. It can easily be argued that being the top dog in a second tier talent state like UGA, Alabama, LSU, Ohio State, and Oklahoma, is better than being second fiddle to an undisputed hegemon in a first tier talent state behind UF, Texas, and USC. UF did pretty good back when FSU was the undisputed hegemon .... The talent pool in Florida has shown yo be plenty large enough to sustain 3 top notch programs, although the difference now is that you've got other Div 1 programs in the state to bleed off some of the talent that would have otherwise provided the depth for the Big 3.
Quote from: OregonBucFan on December 01, 2009, 01:29:00 AMQuote from: awitron on December 01, 2009, 12:59:45 AMFSU is hardly a top 20 program anymore, much less a top 5, OBF. I dunno where you get that from.They have a state full of talent. They have players in that state that want to play there. They have a good fan base and what I understand good facilities. They play in a conference they can dominate. 1)Florida/USC2) Texas3) ?You could turn FSU around very fastTop 5... as in places to coach.If all you have to be is in a state full of talent UCLA and Texas A&M would be great jobs. It can easily be argued that being the top dog in a second tier talent state like UGA, Alabama, LSU, Ohio State, and Oklahoma, is better than being second fiddle to an undisputed hegemon in a first tier talent state behind UF, Texas, and USC.
Quote from: awitron on December 01, 2009, 12:59:45 AMFSU is hardly a top 20 program anymore, much less a top 5, OBF. I dunno where you get that from.They have a state full of talent. They have players in that state that want to play there. They have a good fan base and what I understand good facilities. They play in a conference they can dominate. 1)Florida/USC2) Texas3) ?You could turn FSU around very fastTop 5... as in places to coach.
[I think USF becoming a serious program had a much greater effect. USF got a lot of good players that might have gone to FSU.
CHIP KELLY - DUDE you gotta be kidding me CMON MAN I know you are a homer but Chip Kelly is not a top flight head coach!!
Quote from: Samari28 on November 30, 2009, 11:17:04 PMCHIP KELLY - DUDE you gotta be kidding me CMON MAN I know you are a homer but Chip Kelly is not a top flight head coach!!Good call.