Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
And I hope you realize comparing him to a 6th round prospect in Larsen is not really helping the cause.Larsen has been good but I'd be pissed if we spend a 2nd on him or like you are suggesting a 1st.
Quote from: -ts on January 10, 2011, 06:20:30 PMAnd I hope you realize comparing him to a 6th round prospect in Larsen is not really helping the cause.Larsen has been good but I'd be pissed if we spend a 2nd on him or like you are suggesting a 1st.I'm not comparing him as a player...I'm comparing him when it comes to size...which it seems you aren't graspingLarsen's a decent player who's undersized....hudson is an extremely good player who's undersized....and who scouts say won't be a problem because of how good he is at everything else.Larsen played pretty well for us this year....but hudson is night and day better.
Quote from: barbernbrooks on January 10, 2011, 06:25:17 PMQuote from: -ts on January 10, 2011, 06:20:30 PMAnd I hope you realize comparing him to a 6th round prospect in Larsen is not really helping the cause.Larsen has been good but I'd be pissed if we spend a 2nd on him or like you are suggesting a 1st.I'm not comparing him as a player...I'm comparing him when it comes to size...which it seems you aren't graspingLarsen's a decent player who's undersized....hudson is an extremely good player who's undersized....and who scouts say won't be a problem because of how good he is at everything else.Larsen played pretty well for us this year....but hudson is night and day better.I quit, everything you say is gospel and I shall follow you to the end of the earth.Hudson in the 1st! Though he is going top 15 so trade up!
Quote from: Biggs3535 on January 10, 2011, 05:39:51 PMQuote from: BucsPirate1 on January 10, 2011, 04:06:35 PMQuote from: barbernbrooks on January 10, 2011, 04:01:44 PMAnd before anybody makes another reference to his size, he's the exact same size as ted larsen.By the way Ted Larsen weighs 310 pounds. He's 30 pounds heavier than Hudson.lolzI hope you're laughing at him for saying such a silly, wrong thinghttp://www.fftoolbox.com/nfl_draft/profile_display.cfm?prospect_id=2264
Quote from: BucsPirate1 on January 10, 2011, 04:06:35 PMQuote from: barbernbrooks on January 10, 2011, 04:01:44 PMAnd before anybody makes another reference to his size, he's the exact same size as ted larsen.By the way Ted Larsen weighs 310 pounds. He's 30 pounds heavier than Hudson.lolz
Quote from: barbernbrooks on January 10, 2011, 04:01:44 PMAnd before anybody makes another reference to his size, he's the exact same size as ted larsen.By the way Ted Larsen weighs 310 pounds. He's 30 pounds heavier than Hudson.
And before anybody makes another reference to his size, he's the exact same size as ted larsen.
Quote from: -ts on January 10, 2011, 06:36:22 PMQuote from: barbernbrooks on January 10, 2011, 06:25:17 PMQuote from: -ts on January 10, 2011, 06:20:30 PMAnd I hope you realize comparing him to a 6th round prospect in Larsen is not really helping the cause.Larsen has been good but I'd be pissed if we spend a 2nd on him or like you are suggesting a 1st.I'm not comparing him as a player...I'm comparing him when it comes to size...which it seems you aren't graspingLarsen's a decent player who's undersized....hudson is an extremely good player who's undersized....and who scouts say won't be a problem because of how good he is at everything else.Larsen played pretty well for us this year....but hudson is night and day better.I quit, everything you say is gospel and I shall follow you to the end of the earth.Hudson in the 1st! Though he is going top 15 so trade up!You're a dolt
Quote from: barbernbrooks on January 10, 2011, 06:39:58 PMQuote from: -ts on January 10, 2011, 06:36:22 PMQuote from: barbernbrooks on January 10, 2011, 06:25:17 PMQuote from: -ts on January 10, 2011, 06:20:30 PMAnd I hope you realize comparing him to a 6th round prospect in Larsen is not really helping the cause.Larsen has been good but I'd be pissed if we spend a 2nd on him or like you are suggesting a 1st.I'm not comparing him as a player...I'm comparing him when it comes to size...which it seems you aren't graspingLarsen's a decent player who's undersized....hudson is an extremely good player who's undersized....and who scouts say won't be a problem because of how good he is at everything else.Larsen played pretty well for us this year....but hudson is night and day better.I quit, everything you say is gospel and I shall follow you to the end of the earth.Hudson in the 1st! Though he is going top 15 so trade up!You're a doltYessir Mr. Almighty. Rodney Hudson in the top 15.
naa....Rodney Hudson in the 4th! **CENSORED** the scouts right! what do they know....ts knows best
Quote from: barbernbrooks on January 10, 2011, 06:45:56 PMnaa....Rodney Hudson in the 4th! **CENSORED** the scouts right! what do they know....ts knows bestThe only opinions you have are from internet scouts, not real scouts.
Anyone remember this guy? He had great technique, too. QuoteGREG ESLINGERUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTASENIOR, 6'3", 280 LBS.As the seventh recipient of the Rimington Trophy, Eslinger also became the first from the University of Minnesota to receive the honor. A native of Bismarck, North Dakota, Eslinger began his career with the Gophers as a starting true freshman. He started every game during the 2002 season and was named to The Sporting News All-America Freshman Second Team and The Sporting News Big-Ten All-Freshman Team. As a sophomore, Eslinger only got better and was named a Third Team All-American by the Associated Press, First Team All-Big Ten by coaches and media, First Team All-Big Ten by ESPN.com, and Second Team All-American by SI.com. By the time he was a junior, Eslinger was leading a Minnesota offensive line that allowed only nine sacks in 12 games, the best mark for the team since 1970. No doubt it helped make him a finalist for the 2004 Rimington Trophy. Eslinger capped off a remarkable career at Minnesota during the 2005 season and was named a semifinalist for the Lombardi Award. After the season, Eslinger was drafted by the Denver Broncos in the 2006 NFL Draft.
GREG ESLINGERUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTASENIOR, 6'3", 280 LBS.As the seventh recipient of the Rimington Trophy, Eslinger also became the first from the University of Minnesota to receive the honor. A native of Bismarck, North Dakota, Eslinger began his career with the Gophers as a starting true freshman. He started every game during the 2002 season and was named to The Sporting News All-America Freshman Second Team and The Sporting News Big-Ten All-Freshman Team. As a sophomore, Eslinger only got better and was named a Third Team All-American by the Associated Press, First Team All-Big Ten by coaches and media, First Team All-Big Ten by ESPN.com, and Second Team All-American by SI.com. By the time he was a junior, Eslinger was leading a Minnesota offensive line that allowed only nine sacks in 12 games, the best mark for the team since 1970. No doubt it helped make him a finalist for the 2004 Rimington Trophy. Eslinger capped off a remarkable career at Minnesota during the 2005 season and was named a semifinalist for the Lombardi Award. After the season, Eslinger was drafted by the Denver Broncos in the 2006 NFL Draft.