Boards > College Football Board
BCS Conferences
afitzgerald66:
--- Quote from: bradentonian on January 11, 2011, 01:18:18 PM ---
--- Quote from: TBayXXXVII on January 11, 2011, 01:08:15 PM ---Funny how the SEC is only 1 game better than the Big East for the best winning pct, yet people still think the Big East doesn't deserve a BCS bid.
--- End quote ---
They certainly didn't this year. AQ is a stupid system.
--- End quote ---
They're just the Seahawks of college football this year. Too bad they couldn't have won like them, too.
TBayXXXVII:
--- Quote from: bradentonian on January 11, 2011, 01:18:18 PM ---
--- Quote from: TBayXXXVII on January 11, 2011, 01:08:15 PM ---Funny how the SEC is only 1 game better than the Big East for the best winning pct, yet people still think the Big East doesn't deserve a BCS bid.
--- End quote ---
They certainly didn't this year. AQ is a stupid system.
--- End quote ---
This year isn't the first time it's been raised. People have been saying this ever since Miami, BC, and VA Tech left.
afitzgerald66:
--- Quote from: TBayXXXVII on January 11, 2011, 01:58:53 PM ---
--- Quote from: bradentonian on January 11, 2011, 01:18:18 PM ---
--- Quote from: TBayXXXVII on January 11, 2011, 01:08:15 PM ---Funny how the SEC is only 1 game better than the Big East for the best winning pct, yet people still think the Big East doesn't deserve a BCS bid.
--- End quote ---
They certainly didn't this year. AQ is a stupid system.
--- End quote ---
This year isn't the first time it's been raised. People have been saying this ever since Miami, BC, and VA Tech left.
--- End quote ---
Am I the only one who has seen the ACC's BCS game record? 2-11 or something like that? The BE is batting .500, I think. I see 6-6 but dunno if it's counting UCONN.
Biggs3535:
--- Quote from: TBayXXXVII on January 11, 2011, 01:08:15 PM ---Funny how the SEC is only 1 game better than the Big East for the best winning pct, yet people still think the Big East doesn't deserve a BCS bid.
--- End quote ---
When you break down the Big East, it isn't quite as impressive as the 4-2 looks.
BE #1 (UConn) lost to Big 12 #1 (Oklahoma) by 28 points
BE #2 (WVU) lost to ACC #4 (NC State) by 16 points
BE #3 (Pitt) beat SEC #10 (Kentucky) by 17 points
BE #4 (Syracuse) beat Big 12 #7 (Kansas State) by 2 points
BE #5 (USF) beat ACC #8 (Clemson) by 5 points
BE #6 (Louisville) beat Conf. USA #5 (S. Miss) by 3 points
I mean it isn't good when you signature victory is the Co-Conference Champion beating the #10 team in the SEC.
Biggs3535:
--- Quote from: bradentonian on January 11, 2011, 01:02:59 PM ---I still don't understand that crap about a "split" championship for USC. They are in the BCS system and didn't win the BCS championship game. How can they have a championship?
--- End quote ---
They were the AP champs, but I suppose you are right for the sake of this thread. LSU was the BCS champs that year.
I would edit it if this board didn't suck.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version