Welcome, Guest
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Senior Bowl Weigh-ins « previous next »
Page: 1 2 3 4 5

Skull and Bones

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 23027
Offline
#15 : January 24, 2011, 05:01:26 PM

so I see Beal is 6'2 268.  is that good or bad?


Skull and Bones

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 23027
Offline
#16 : January 24, 2011, 05:05:18 PM

Acho might be short but damn he's got 35" long arms.


tbb345

*
Starter
****
Posts : 434
Offline
#17 : January 24, 2011, 05:11:35 PM

If Beal is in good shape, that is a pretty impressive size. Thought he would weigh less than that

Biggs3535

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 31581
Online
#18 : January 24, 2011, 05:57:05 PM

I like Beal.  I hope he's still available in the 2nd, but he won't be if he shows off this week and at the combine.


dalbuc

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 21495
Offline
#19 : January 24, 2011, 06:15:21 PM

Beal's weight is heavier than expected, I saw a lot of 260-265 estimates on him. Miller is less than people thought at 237. His problem is he's got 3-4 OLB game in a 4-3 OLB body. That'll be interesting to see what happens with him.

All posts are opinions in case you are too stupid to figure that out on your own without me saying it over and over.

watson

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 5169
Offline
#20 : January 24, 2011, 06:25:27 PM

Beal's weight is heavier than expected, I saw a lot of 260-265 estimates on him. Miller is less than people thought at 237. His problem is he's got 3-4 OLB game in a 4-3 OLB body. That'll be interesting to see what happens with him.
I could be wrong, but I thought I read somewhere that James Harrison was in a similar situation when he came out.

Truths:
1.  Never have an argument with an idiot.  They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with their experience.
2.  For some it would be better if they remained silent and be thought a fool than to speak and erase all doubt.

JDouble

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 29156
Offline
#21 : January 24, 2011, 06:55:01 PM

Kerrigan's stock probably just went down. He was listed as 6'4" 264lbs, which gives the impression he can bulk up 10lbs or so and be perfect size for a 4-3 DE. At 6'3" 255lbs looking to be in perfect shape, he is clearly much smaller than a prototypical 4-3 DE. The question to most teams will now be...does he have the ability to play OLB in a 3-4? I think he'll be there at 20 now if the Bucs want him. I doubt any 4-3 team will spend a first on a DE that small.

Devine is off my list. I don't care how amzing you looked in college. 160lbs is just too small. Period.

My boy Nate Irving 6ft 1/2inch 242lbs! That's what I'm talking about. Maybe all those folks saying he is too small to be a MLB will hush now.

Mason Foster had the same measurements as Irving. Two solid cats.

Mark Herzlich looked like Hercules at 6'4" 250lbs. I wonder if he can play MLB in a 4-3....

At 6'2" 268lbs, I think Jeremy Beal is the true 4-3 RE we are looking for.





1Va bucsfan

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 3842
Offline
#22 : January 24, 2011, 07:18:09 PM

Herzlich,Foster and K.J Wright are some of the LB's i'm hoping for and they all passed the measurables test today!

\\\"The guy who invented the first wheel was an idiot, the guy who invented the other three, he was a genius

GameTime

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 19290
Online
#23 : January 24, 2011, 07:28:52 PM

sam acho's arms lost 2 inches on scott wrights page.  that stinks for him.

i dont think kerrigans size scares me away...nfl has jared allen listed at 270...but hopefully it does cause kerrigan to drop a few more spots.

i like the info on devine...drop him to the 6th/7th and id be fine using a pick on him.  (although in my mocks i have traded those picks for the rights to gholston and maybin)

lots of LB's, maybe even take a couple depending on FA.  i like that mccarthy look soft, could drop him even more.

\"Lets put the O back in Country\"

Tampafan8251

*
Starter
****
Posts : 750
Offline
#24 : January 24, 2011, 07:44:10 PM

So in order which linebackers would you want us to draft? I really like Irving, but that kid Wright measured in pretty good and also could be an option, I wouldnt mind us taking Mason Foster either

Feel Real Good

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 27576
Online
#25 : January 24, 2011, 07:49:13 PM

In my very limited research on Wright, I'm concerned he was a 3-year starter and never had double digit TFL. It doesn't appear he really has a knack for making plays in the backfield, though he does have solid sack numbers.

FRG is the most logical poster on this board.  You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.

Tampafan8251

*
Starter
****
Posts : 750
Offline
#26 : January 24, 2011, 08:00:28 PM

I liked how Irving measured in, he is bigger then most said he was, 6 foot 1 and 242 for a MLB is perfect, I would love for us to pick him up in the second round.

PassThePigSkin

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 2450
Offline
#27 : January 24, 2011, 08:27:32 PM

so I see Beal is 6'2 268.  is that good or bad?

Same weight he played at in college, Beal is built for his weight instead of having a sloppy body.

Skull and Bones

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 23027
Offline
#28 : January 24, 2011, 08:29:25 PM

sam acho's arms lost 2 inches on scott wrights page.  that stinks for him.

yeah I saw that.  33 5/8" is probably right.  still pretty long for a guy only 6'1".
: January 24, 2011, 08:31:21 PM Skull and Bones


PassThePigSkin

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 2450
Offline
#29 : January 24, 2011, 08:30:16 PM

Acho might be short but damn he's got 35" long arms.

 Elvis Dumervill.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Senior Bowl Weigh-ins « previous next »
:

Hide Tools Show Tools