Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
stop looking at stats.....clayborn is an absolute monster.....he throws people around and is violent with his arms...he's very stout at the poin t of the tack, and he controls the o lineman and not the other way around. He knows how to beat tackles even if they shut down his first move. He also brings an attitude and swagger that a guy like kerrigan lacks
Quote from: mgchat76 on February 02, 2011, 11:44:42 AMDaquan Bowers only had 1 good year, Robert Quinn only had 1 good year, Cameron Jordan and J.J. Watt have never had even had double digit sacks. Quinn was suspended so his production was non-existent. It wasn't like he played and didn't produce.Bowers scares me for the same reason BTW. Still, getting better as you play is a fairly common pattern with players. Falling off the table like clayborn did isn't.Jordan and Watt aren't pass rushers, they're 5 technique players not 43 ends so I'd not hink they'd bee seen as pass rushers anyways.I'm not sure why people assume 2009 was what he was. 3 out of 4 years say he's JAG. Would you draft him based on 2010 in the first round?
Daquan Bowers only had 1 good year, Robert Quinn only had 1 good year, Cameron Jordan and J.J. Watt have never had even had double digit sacks.
Justin Smith ain't bad for the #20 pick, but the problem is Clayborn's downside is a lot lower. You wouldn't use the #20 pick on Antonio Smith.
There is no such thing as a 'safe pick'.JMHO.
Quote from: Feel Real Good on February 02, 2011, 01:10:51 PMJustin Smith ain't bad for the #20 pick, but the problem is Clayborn's downside is a lot lower. You wouldn't use the #20 pick on Antonio Smith.I don't see that. Everyone's downside is the same. You're a bust and you wash out of the league in 3 years. I just don't see how you could watch Clayborn and not see how difficult it would be for him to not be able to do some really positive things that would keep him in the legue for a long time. I see Clayborn as a failed NFL football player still contributing to a team in shoring up their run D and lasting 8 to 10 years in the legue. Thats as a total failure. (Barring significant injury of course) He's just too tough, too physical to not help your defense. To call this guy anything but a safe pick is stretching it.
Quote from: jbear on February 02, 2011, 02:03:50 PMQuote from: Feel Real Good on February 02, 2011, 01:10:51 PMJustin Smith ain't bad for the #20 pick, but the problem is Clayborn's downside is a lot lower. You wouldn't use the #20 pick on Antonio Smith.I don't see that. Everyone's downside is the same. You're a bust and you wash out of the league in 3 years. I just don't see how you could watch Clayborn and not see how difficult it would be for him to not be able to do some really positive things that would keep him in the legue for a long time. I see Clayborn as a failed NFL football player still contributing to a team in shoring up their run D and lasting 8 to 10 years in the legue. Thats as a total failure. (Barring significant injury of course) He's just too tough, too physical to not help your defense. To call this guy anything but a safe pick is stretching it. Yes, a bust is a bust, but I was trying to illustrate the difference between average players at different positions. If Justin Smith is the best comparison Clayborn could hope to be, then Antonio Smith is the average version. Likewise if Jevon Kearse is the best Aldon Smith could hope to be, then Darren Howard may be the average version. An average speed end like Darren Howard is more valuable than an average power end like Antonio Smith.
What about explosion and a mean streak? Whoever we land I hope he has bad intentions whenever he gets into the backfield or any ball carrier!