Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
IMO, the Bucs have NO need for a "speed" receiver. Both Benn and MW are good deep receivers. In fact, Benn showed he may just be an outstanding deep receiver. He didn't just get open deep, he got WIDE open deep!!As to TE, I would like to have a young one who can block and catch passes, but I would prefer to get a pass-rushing DE and a linebacker first. If Luke Stocker is there in the 3rd round, I would be fine getting him. However, I would really prefer to see the 3rd round pick go for either another pass-rusher, another linebacker or an olinemen. Then go after a higher pick at TE in the 2012 draft. I want another one, but I want an outstanding one, not just a "pretty good" one.
it might not be a bad idea to draft a back with some wheels.
I wouldn't be opposed to it but i just don't see it happening. However, we do know its all about #5.
Quote from: Hate on February 12, 2011, 11:45:53 PMI wouldn't be opposed to it but i just don't see it happening. However, we do know its all about #5.I think a quality #2 TE to run 2 TE sets and teaching Blount the blocking schemes and to catch the ball would be even better.Williams on one side Benn on the other, Winslow as TE1 and lets say Kendricks as TE2 and Blount in the backfield by himself. Is it a pass or run? 1 TE in the pattern or 2? Is Blount gonna pass protect or drop into the flat. I see major mismatches if the O-line could hold it's own against simple rushes.