Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: SunnyD on February 16, 2011, 10:48:21 AMOkam is an Under-tackle guys. Played three-technique for us. Didn't play the nose in the 3-4 or 3-3-5Yeah, but you gotta figure McCoy and Price not being in the line-up affected that. Okam is more of a NT with those guys on the roster.
Okam is an Under-tackle guys. Played three-technique for us. Didn't play the nose in the 3-4 or 3-3-5
You have to take into consideration that Okam started playing well when he got used to being on the team. He gradually got better as he got used to being here. Okam should be one of the starters in the middle for us next year, period.
Miller will be a good sub and Price should be our other starter. We have to consider that we do not really even know what we have in the middle of our D line because they got hurt or they were not with us to start the year. I like what Bennett showed but we didn't play much. McCoy is going to be a good DT, but with his skill you have to wonder what kind of numbers he would put up as a DE. I think he could put up incredible numbers.
I don't think McCoy's contract or draft position should have any negative effect on where he is slotted along the DL. It wasn't until recently that DTs started making around the same range as DEs anyway.If Morris wants to appease the fans he will put McCoy in a position that best fits him, which IMO is LE and keep him there. That is the best way for him to succeed. Rep after rep at the same position. He is a finesse DT, but out on the edge that works for him a lot better. He can use his quickness and athleticism to beat the majority of RTs in the league.Price and Okam are way better suited for the UT position in our defense and will take a lot of pressure off McCoy on the outside. McCoy will enjoy a lot of one on ones with those two next to him.I see a lot of people interested in guys like Adrian Clayborn. Why take a guy like him to play LE when we have a better version in McCoy already rostered and being paid a ton of money.If you look at players Millard's coached (http://www.coachmillard.com/Keith_Millard_Football_Academy/Players.html) to big sack totals you will find the majority of them being very close to McCoy's stature while playing at DE. Reggie Hayward 6-5 280, Trevor Pryce 6-5 290, Bertrand Berry was closer to McCoy's size than his listed weight of 6-3 254 and most recently we saw McCoy's fellow draft mate Lamarr Houston play LE for the Raiders at 6-3 305 with 5 sacks this year.To me the most bang for the Buc would be to have Millard put McCoy in the same LE position he helped all these guys reach successful numbers at and have Price who compares very favorably to Sapp play the UT role he made famous in Tampa.
Quote from: LABuc on February 16, 2011, 01:37:25 AMPrice at UT, Okam at NT, McCoy at LDE.... Quinn (Am I allowed to dream?) at RDE..... ... Bennett, Miller, Woods, McGee as backups.... hmmm...I really think we might be best with Price at UT and McCoy at LE, but after drafting McCoy so high and giving him such a huge contract, I'll be very surprised (and impressed) if Rah and Dom have the balls to admit Price is the better UT and actually move McCoy to LE. In all honesty though if you forget about where folks were drafted and the size of contracts....McCoy's longer leaner frame and the way he plays the game could make him a dominant LE, while Price is 10x better at getting immediate penetration up the middle. The problem is in real life we can't just forget about where they were drafted and the size of their contract. If McCoy was really moved to LE, Rah and Dom would catch all kinds of hell from the sports writers, the fans, and the owners. As far as Okam at NT, I'm not sure if he is the best, but with him, Woods, and Miller all competing for that spot I am confident whichever one wins will be a solid starting nose tackle for us. I'd like Okam to win though, because he has the highest ceiling with the most potential.
Price at UT, Okam at NT, McCoy at LDE.... Quinn (Am I allowed to dream?) at RDE..... ... Bennett, Miller, Woods, McGee as backups.... hmmm...
You are right, Price hasn't done squat. He might never do squat in the NFL, but by watching their college tape there is no doubt that Price is faster off the snap and gets quicker penetration up the middle. McCoy tends to wait and react where as Price just immediately explodes through his gap. I'm not saying Price is definitely the better UT, I'm just saying there is a good chance. Last year in OTAs all we heard was how Price nearly ruined practice by being so disruptive. He was out playing McCoy and that was with a bad hip. If he comes back healthy there is a very good possibility he once again out shines McCoy at UT. If it happens...what do you do? Stick with your #3 pick to save face or swallow your pride and start the best player?
Quote from: JDouble on February 16, 2011, 03:05:59 PMYou are right, Price hasn't done squat. He might never do squat in the NFL, but by watching their college tape there is no doubt that Price is faster off the snap and gets quicker penetration up the middle. McCoy tends to wait and react where as Price just immediately explodes through his gap. I'm not saying Price is definitely the better UT, I'm just saying there is a good chance. Last year in OTAs all we heard was how Price nearly ruined practice by being so disruptive. He was out playing McCoy and that was with a bad hip. If he comes back healthy there is a very good possibility he once again out shines McCoy at UT. If it happens...what do you do? Stick with your #3 pick to save face or swallow your pride and start the best player?I thought Oklahoma and UCLA ran different Dline fronts, Oklahoma was the read and react team and UcLA was more aggressive. Stick with you're #3 I say there is no way Price can beat out McCoy. 2 things against Price will he be in shape? and how will he play against starters. Anybody who can dominate TB oline in practice isn't saying much, most of the time they know what the play is.
Quote from: PassThePigSkin on February 16, 2011, 04:19:30 PMQuote from: JDouble on February 16, 2011, 03:05:59 PMYou are right, Price hasn't done squat. He might never do squat in the NFL, but by watching their college tape there is no doubt that Price is faster off the snap and gets quicker penetration up the middle. McCoy tends to wait and react where as Price just immediately explodes through his gap. I'm not saying Price is definitely the better UT, I'm just saying there is a good chance. Last year in OTAs all we heard was how Price nearly ruined practice by being so disruptive. He was out playing McCoy and that was with a bad hip. If he comes back healthy there is a very good possibility he once again out shines McCoy at UT. If it happens...what do you do? Stick with your #3 pick to save face or swallow your pride and start the best player?I thought Oklahoma and UCLA ran different Dline fronts, Oklahoma was the read and react team and UcLA was more aggressive. Stick with you're #3 I say there is no way Price can beat out McCoy. 2 things against Price will he be in shape? and how will he play against starters. Anybody who can dominate TB oline in practice isn't saying much, most of the time they know what the play is.No Suh's defense at Nebraska was a read and react scheme under Pelini. All McCoy was asked to do was get up field and disrupt the play, which is why he was looked at as a bad run defender. McCoy and Price both played some DE as well in college, but I think in the NFL the lengthy McCoy would be better suited to seal the edge while Price's stout and strong frame will work better at UT. Putting Price at the Nose is fine if you want to waste his disruptive get off. He is capable of playing the nose, but why wouldn't you put him at UT where he can fire into his gap and push the play out to McCoy at LE.
. I am so completely amazed at anybody who thinks we should move McCoy to another position so we can make room for Frank Okam. Wow. Just...wow.
Price is just over 6ft and PR reported he was down to 285lbs by the end of preseason. I don't think he has the size to be a nose tackle.
I think Okam is a 3-tech regardless of who else is playing. He's not as stout as his size would indicate and his length gives him poor anchoring leverage. I see him as McCoy's backup if he's active for us.