Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: Detrimental on February 18, 2011, 02:42:22 PMQuote from: champkind on February 18, 2011, 02:37:24 PMQuote from: Detrimental on February 18, 2011, 02:28:57 PMQuote from: yuccaneers on February 18, 2011, 12:37:24 PMWould rather him or any player be a football player rather then an athleteThen consider him a round two option. Because the best athletes go in the first 32 picks.Only in a world where all 32 teams are the Raiders. In reality many teams are smart enough not to be fooled into thinking every player has to be a prototypical athlete, and instead focus on how they actually play football.Typical casual fan comment. Can you name me one player in the FIRST round in 2010 drat class that wasn't a good athlete? Regarding SKILL position players anyway.I know the amount.....ZERO*checks 09 draft*Found another answer.....ZEROHow about 2008? ZERO2007? ZERO.I suppose I am too casual, then. I am also glad that you aren't in charge of the team.
Quote from: champkind on February 18, 2011, 02:37:24 PMQuote from: Detrimental on February 18, 2011, 02:28:57 PMQuote from: yuccaneers on February 18, 2011, 12:37:24 PMWould rather him or any player be a football player rather then an athleteThen consider him a round two option. Because the best athletes go in the first 32 picks.Only in a world where all 32 teams are the Raiders. In reality many teams are smart enough not to be fooled into thinking every player has to be a prototypical athlete, and instead focus on how they actually play football.Typical casual fan comment. Can you name me one player in the FIRST round in 2010 drat class that wasn't a good athlete? Regarding SKILL position players anyway.I know the amount.....ZERO*checks 09 draft*Found another answer.....ZEROHow about 2008? ZERO2007? ZERO.
Quote from: Detrimental on February 18, 2011, 02:28:57 PMQuote from: yuccaneers on February 18, 2011, 12:37:24 PMWould rather him or any player be a football player rather then an athleteThen consider him a round two option. Because the best athletes go in the first 32 picks.Only in a world where all 32 teams are the Raiders. In reality many teams are smart enough not to be fooled into thinking every player has to be a prototypical athlete, and instead focus on how they actually play football.
Quote from: yuccaneers on February 18, 2011, 12:37:24 PMWould rather him or any player be a football player rather then an athleteThen consider him a round two option. Because the best athletes go in the first 32 picks.
Would rather him or any player be a football player rather then an athlete
Great cop-out dude. I'm still awaiting my answer for guys that were "blah" athletes that were taken in the FIRST round. The answer is none and you and I both know that. He's a good player but good athlete? Absolutely not. The combine will expose him and it should drop his stock.I mean in reality that's just how the game works in the NFL. The best athletes will be coveted the blah athletes will be avoided, AT skill position players.
Quote from: Detrimental on February 18, 2011, 03:03:44 PMGreat cop-out dude. I'm still awaiting my answer for guys that were "blah" athletes that were taken in the FIRST round. The answer is none and you and I both know that. He's a good player but good athlete? Absolutely not. The combine will expose him and it should drop his stock.I mean in reality that's just how the game works in the NFL. The best athletes will be coveted the blah athletes will be avoided, AT skill position players.I appreciate the use of the highly technical and precise term "blah" athlete. The combine hasn't happened yet. We have no idea what kind of numbers Kerrigan will put up. Based on his physique at the Senior Bowl, the guy obviously has no problem hitting the gym. IF he flops at the combine, then you can declare him whatever you like with some kind of credibility. As they say, however, the tape don't lie, and the tape on Kerrigan is damn good. Hope he falls to us.
You're the only person on earth that refers to positions on the defensive line as "skill positions".
I've watched him play a lot. Kerrigan will be a good DE, the way he plays the game fits his athletic ability.
The "experts" get it wrong all the time, last year they all though Alualu was a second round pick at best and a bit "blah" then they were all left scratching thier heads and wondering why Jacksonville picked him with the 10th pick. Kerrigan has had the most important thing of all, consistent production. Currently we have no true LDE or RDE on our squad, so with that said if we pick Kerrigan at 20 and he pans out to be a very good LDE then we still fill a position that could do with an upgrade. Until draft day happens and we see who goes at the top and who is close to us when we pick then all the mocks, and all the whining over which player is better, means squat. The horrible and glaring fact is we need a good RDE as well as a good LDE, so if we can get a good player to fill either spot in the first round then we are a better team.
Quote from: PassThePigSkin on February 18, 2011, 02:17:22 PMI've watched him play a lot. Kerrigan will be a good DE, the way he plays the game fits his athletic ability.This. His stock has slowly fallen every week for about a month now, and according to many draft sites he'll definitely be there at 20. I've watched him play enough that my opinion isn't going to change no matter what the "professionals" say. He probably doesn't have the athleticism to be an OLB, but he is one helluva football player and he's going to be a very solid DE in the NFL. He might end up being a LE instead of a RE, but either way he will be disruptive.