Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Everyone wants to rush the passer...yet we had a top.10 pass defense. We didn't stop the run. Sacks are sexy, but stopping the run wins games imo.
Blaze _ we stopped the passer the last season. We didn't sack the qb, but we had a top 10 pass def. While having the number 1 rush def isn't necessary, being dead last isn't helping.
Quote from: GameTime on April 19, 2011, 09:54:42 PMBlaze _ we stopped the passer the last season. We didn't sack the qb, but we had a top 10 pass def. While having the number 1 rush def isn't necessary, being dead last isn't helping.Opposing quarterbacks posted a 77.57 rating against us last year, seventh best in the league. Our passers posted a 96.25 rating, fourth best in the league. We finished 10-6, despite our 28th rank in rush defense.The Super Bowl champion Packers? Third in passer rating, first in passer rating allowed. 18th in rush defense. 24th in rush offense.I think that pretty much proves my point.
Quote from: Blaze688 on April 19, 2011, 10:03:40 PMQuote from: GameTime on April 19, 2011, 09:54:42 PMBlaze _ we stopped the passer the last season. We didn't sack the qb, but we had a top 10 pass def. While having the number 1 rush def isn't necessary, being dead last isn't helping.Opposing quarterbacks posted a 77.57 rating against us last year, seventh best in the league. Our passers posted a 96.25 rating, fourth best in the league. We finished 10-6, despite our 28th rank in rush defense.The Super Bowl champion Packers? Third in passer rating, first in passer rating allowed. 18th in rush defense. 24th in rush offense.I think that pretty much proves my point.The Bucs play Green Bay well. They can beat them.
What's the difference between rushing the passer and stopping the passer?
And the packers would have been on the couch come playoff time had the refs not botched the det game. I don't think the packers by themselves prove a point. If so we might as well scrap the 4-3 and get that 3-4 ready.