Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: GameTime on June 27, 2011, 08:10:40 PMQuote from: Freddy on June 27, 2011, 08:06:33 PMEnd game, Lee and Hardmen are not as good as TB and Davin. How does trueblood not regaining his starting position after he was healthy affect the endgame?Does it affect the 'endgame'?
Quote from: Freddy on June 27, 2011, 08:06:33 PMEnd game, Lee and Hardmen are not as good as TB and Davin. How does trueblood not regaining his starting position after he was healthy affect the endgame?
End game, Lee and Hardmen are not as good as TB and Davin.
Gosh, they'll both me missed. Overrated overdrafted sacks of trash.
Mangurian was fired for his "handling" ofplayers? I thought it was more friction between him and olson? And am I supposed to believe that the OC was okay with a better healthy guy sitting the bench? And when did trueblood gvet benched? I thought he lost his job due to injury, and was never able to regain it?
But lets not even pretend that Lee and Hardmen are quality starters either.
Where does one find 2 OL FA who have to play next to each other, almost walk in off the street, and be able to play well starting with opening day?
Quote from: Freddy on June 27, 2011, 07:35:43 PM But lets not even pretend that Lee and Hardmen are quality starters either. Who is pretending that? Nobody said they are quality starters. What has been said is there was very, very little drop-off - if any - when they were in the game over Joseph and Trueblood. That should either tell you Lee and Hardman are better than you think they are or Joseph and Trueblood aren't as good as you think they are. I'm going with option #2.Quote from: Uncle Stan on June 28, 2011, 08:57:06 AMWhere does one find 2 OL FA who have to play next to each other, almost walk in off the street, and be able to play well starting with opening day?This implies Joseph and Trueblood 'play well'. They don't.
Maybe one day you all will realize that the offense got better despite Hardmen and Lee and Zuttah instead of because of them. The offense got better because the 2 rookie WR's learned more and got better as the season went along. The offense got better because for the 1st time since Alstott was in his prime, the team had a RB that demanded respect and could actually exploit holes made for him or make his own. Maybe it was because the the QB actually started seeing the field better, performed better, played smarter and had the ability to overcome the the deficiencies of others. Some keep saying, the offense actually got SLIGHTLY better towards the end of the season (others say there was a slight drop off), so Hardmen and Lee must be just as good as Davin and TB. I say, had Davin or TB not been hurt in the first place, the the offense would have improved even more and the Bucs would have made the playoffs. That is the only improvement that matters.
Does the coaching staff need to have its' collective mind checked