Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
She probably did it, but the case against her was awful. Like you said they had nothing for real evidence, and really no one should be convicted of a crime based on what they had has evidence.Only thing for sure was that the woman was a **CENSORED** parent.
A shocker to most, but Im not surprised. The prosecution relied 100% on circumstancial evidence. And while I followed the trial I was disappointed that they didnt have any real evidence that links Casey to the crime.I think she did it. But I agree with the jury that you cannot convict someone of a crime with just their behavior as the evidence. The state didnt prove their case.
Hopefully the real killer, whoever it is, gets found and brought to justice.
No D for 3 years..
Illuminator is a good poster. He sticks to his guns and makes good points. Some don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'t like that.