Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Will the Bucs regret cutting Barrett Ruud loose?
The short answer is: in the long run, probably not. Ruud made a large number of plays for Tampa, but advanced metrics show he had a rather poor 2010, especially against the run (he was the 105th-ranked linebacker in yards per run tackle, at 4.8 per carry against). The fact the Titans signed him to just a one-year deal reveals Ruud's value in the marketplace.
But in the short term, with Bucs fans charged up over last year's 10-6 record, and with Atlanta and New Orleans in the division, having an experienced leader of the defense wearing pewter would seem a necessity, even an average one such as Ruud. Instead, the Bucs appear ready to go to battle with either second-year man Tyrone McKenzie, who had all of five tackles in 2010, or rookie Mason Foster, a third-round choice out of Washington, manning the inside.
General manager Mark Dominik has proved his preference for young, cheap players time and again, and the strategy has mostly worked. In this case, the "Mike" linebacker situation will be strongly affected by the play, and health, of high 2010 draftee tackles Gerald McCoy and Brian Price up front. McCoy lost three games to an arm injury last season (and left an early Bucs practice with a shoulder ding), and Price missed all but five games with a nasty pelvic injury that required two surgeries and the insertion of several screws. Add the health concerns of 2011 top choices Da'Quan Bowers and Adrian Clayborn, along with the legal limbo of cornerback/repeat(edly charged) offender Aqib Talib, and the Bucs have plenty of question marks on defense. By cutting Ruud, they added another.
http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/6850035/nfl-remaining-questions-atlanta-falcons-new-orleans-saints-rest-nfc-southAtleast they note in the long run it was probably a good move.