Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
It's not the run d that will be the indicator. It's the pass d.
you guys realize the only guy you are debating with is just screwing with you?
Why would the pass d be the indicator?Rudd sucked at stopping the run. The guy replacing him wont be on the field on 3rd and long. I think the big indicator will be how the run d does
Why would the pass d be the indicator?
Quote from: buchead on August 11, 2011, 08:34:53 AMWhy would the pass d be the indicator?Because pass d was Ruud's strength. If you replace Ruud, you need to look at how much your pass d suffers because he was greatly contributing to that - regardless of what some people want to believe.
Ruud was good at pass d but its not like he was one of the best in the game at it.
Quote from: BucBalla85 on August 11, 2011, 09:58:15 AMRuud was good at pass d but its not like he was one of the best in the game at it. At linebacker? Yes he is one of the best in the game at it at linebacker.
I agree. They will be fine without Freeman in the long run too. All players get replaced. But in the short run, this is a weaker team without Ruud.