Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
I have to agree, though I think you meant to say they aren't calculated in the jobless numbers.
Quote from: CBWx2 on August 16, 2011, 06:58:10 PMCalifornia and Florida have experienced more state-to-state immigration than Texas has, yet population growth in both of those states was slower than it was in Texas by a good margin. Remember how you were crapping on that whole birth rate and Mexican immigration thing? Well, what else explains it if not what Krugman said?Did u just say California? The state where folks are leaving faster than they are arriving? That California?
California and Florida have experienced more state-to-state immigration than Texas has, yet population growth in both of those states was slower than it was in Texas by a good margin. Remember how you were crapping on that whole birth rate and Mexican immigration thing? Well, what else explains it if not what Krugman said?
Texas is the 2nd most populated state in the country and is growing at a faster rate than both Florida and California combined, yet is behind Florida and California in interstate migration. What that suggests is that a large portion of the growth is not coming from transplants from other states.
Illuminator is a good poster. He sticks to his guns and makes good points. Some don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'t like that.
Quote from: CBWx2 on August 16, 2011, 08:50:23 PMTexas is the 2nd most populated state in the country and is growing at a faster rate than both Florida and California combined, yet is behind Florida and California in interstate migration. What that suggests is that a large portion of the growth is not coming from transplants from other states.'Cause Mehico is not a state yet.
Yup, that one. Top 3 states in interstate immigration from 2005 to 2010:1. Florida - 1.86 million2. California - 1.45 million3. Texas - 1.36 millionsource: http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/censr-8.pdf
Quote from: CBWx2 on August 16, 2011, 08:50:23 PMYup, that one. Top 3 states in interstate immigration from 2005 to 2010:1. Florida - 1.86 million2. California - 1.45 million3. Texas - 1.36 millionsource: http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/censr-8.pdfThat link is 11 years old and says California had a net loss of 755k. Wrong link or did I interpret something wrong? Edit: Ah, I get it now. The 1.45 million people is total in migration. Problem is, 2.2 million went out. Texas had 1.36 million in and 1.2 million out for a gain of 150K. So I guess that would explain a population INCREASE for Texas, 'specially over the last 10 years, and a population DECREASE for California. California did have more people going in, but it also had a lot more people who had learnt their lesson and were hightailing it out of there, interesting enough, in large dollops to Texas.
Quote from: spartan on August 16, 2011, 05:21:40 PMWhy are so many people moving to Texas? For government jobs? http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2011/08/16/how-rick-perry-created-jobs-in-texas QuoteSince the recession began, Texas has added about 75,000 jobs, one of the few states with any job creation at all. Overall, the U.S. economy has lost about 5.6 million jobs since then. But net job gains in Texas have come entirely from government hiring, which accounts for 115,000 new jobs over the past three years. The private sector in Texas shed about 40,000 jobs during that time.
Why are so many people moving to Texas?
Since the recession began, Texas has added about 75,000 jobs, one of the few states with any job creation at all. Overall, the U.S. economy has lost about 5.6 million jobs since then. But net job gains in Texas have come entirely from government hiring, which accounts for 115,000 new jobs over the past three years. The private sector in Texas shed about 40,000 jobs during that time.
You think any "Big Oil" will help him out as well?