Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: chace1986 on February 07, 2013, 05:14:30 PMEach offense runs differently and there are several "experts" who argue that Flacco was asked to throw more difficult throws than any other QB in the league and had more attempts of 20+ yards than any other QB. Now, that being said, I certainly won't try to paint the picture as if Flacco's missed throws weren't as bad as Freeman's. Freeman threw the third most passes that went at least 20 yards in the air.
Each offense runs differently and there are several "experts" who argue that Flacco was asked to throw more difficult throws than any other QB in the league and had more attempts of 20+ yards than any other QB. Now, that being said, I certainly won't try to paint the picture as if Flacco's missed throws weren't as bad as Freeman's.
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
Quote from: RogerGoodellSucks on February 07, 2013, 02:22:08 PMOh yea, and Flacco's completion percentage during his amazing playoff run was the SAME as Freeman's was during the regular season this year.I personally don't think that individual stat means all that much when it stands alone. Each offense runs differently and there are several "experts" who argue that Flacco was asked to throw more difficult throws than any other QB in the league and had more attempts of 20+ yards than any other QB. Now, that being said, I certainly won't try to paint the picture as if Flacco's missed throws weren't as bad as Freeman's. I am about halfway through rewatching all of Flacco's throws this season. I will say this, he is definitely not elite and has some issues with consistency. There are times that he holds onto the ball far too long, and early in the season he made several poor decisions and the DBs didn't make him pay by dropping the ball. There are definitely some WTF Freeman-type moments. Torrey Smith also helped prevent an INT or two on opportunity balls, which is something we have seen Vjax do for Freeman. On the flip side, there are some throws that Flacco makes that are absolutely brilliant. I think his deep ball is probably no better than Freeman's in terms of success rate and giving the WRs a good opportunity to go make a play, but where Flacco is miles ahead of Freeman, is on the short to intermediate throws. In almost every game that I have seen, there have been multiple throws that were just out of this world. Also, an area where Flacco is a lot better is in his escapability. I was actually quite surprised going back ad looking at that and seeing him escape. There was actually a 3rd and 15 late in the game vs. KC where he took off and got the 1st, which helped them continue the drive and run out the clock. I certainly hope Freeman brings that portion back to his game. When looking at QBs, I feel that stats are situation and a QB might not be racking up tons of yards or points if the dictation of the game isn't forcing them to. Back to the deep ball. One thing that helps Flacco on deep sideline throws is his ability to get a HUGE arch on the ball. Sometimes its too much and he undershoots his guys, but others, it allows his WRs to make a good play on the ball at its highest point. There also seemed to be a lot of PIs called against the defenders when Flacco was targeting them. This could just be a coincidence or it could be Flacco forcing a PI out of the defender with a good throw. Im not to sure. So is he elite and did the Ravens solely win because of Flacco?..of course not...is he just as inconsistent as Freeman in areas? Absolutely...but Flacco does IMO, have a better arm and this post season run might just be the beginning of him turning into a consistent week in - week out playmaking QB. One other thing, Dennis Pitta is a beast, and was WIDE open a lot this season. He helped out Flacco exponentially.So in conclusion, Flacco is a better QB at this point, but not by a ton. Can Freeman get to his level and win a Super Bowl? Even an inconsistent QB can get hot and anything can happen, I suppose.
Oh yea, and Flacco's completion percentage during his amazing playoff run was the SAME as Freeman's was during the regular season this year.
Quote from: Detrimental on February 07, 2013, 10:18:32 AMFlacco had a 1 great playoff stretch. But, its crazy to think how everybody somehow forgets how bad was prior till this year. He still has ways to go in terms of greatness - mr far from consistent. Flacco was straight up garbage 3 years in a row in the playoffs and then year 5 he is godsend. What a joke.Exactly. It's laughable. Flacco is horribly inconsistent. There isn't a single thing that Flacco has that Freeman doesn't, except for enough talent around him to carry him to the playoffs 5 seasons in a row despite his up and down play. Flacco has had 12 career games where he's failed to complete at least 50% of his passes. The Ravens are 6-6 in those games. Freeman has had 8 such games. The Bucs are 1-7 in them. Flacco has had 49 games where he has thrown 0-1 TD passes. The Ravens are 31-18 (.633) in those games. Freeman has had 34 such games. The Bucs are 10-24 (.417) in those games. You want to know what the difference has been? The caliber of the other 21 players that line up with them each week, and the caliber of the coaches calling the shots on the sidelines.The bottom line is that if Flacco were a Buccaneer and Freeman a Raven, the title of this thread would be Flacco "ELITE" QB and you all would be telling us how much better Freeman was than him.
Flacco had a 1 great playoff stretch. But, its crazy to think how everybody somehow forgets how bad was prior till this year. He still has ways to go in terms of greatness - mr far from consistent. Flacco was straight up garbage 3 years in a row in the playoffs and then year 5 he is godsend. What a joke.
Quote from: CBWx2 on February 07, 2013, 11:31:16 AMQuote from: Detrimental on February 07, 2013, 10:18:32 AMFlacco had a 1 great playoff stretch. But, its crazy to think how everybody somehow forgets how bad was prior till this year. He still has ways to go in terms of greatness - mr far from consistent. Flacco was straight up garbage 3 years in a row in the playoffs and then year 5 he is godsend. What a joke.Exactly. It's laughable. Flacco is horribly inconsistent. There isn't a single thing that Flacco has that Freeman doesn't, except for enough talent around him to carry him to the playoffs 5 seasons in a row despite his up and down play. Flacco has had 12 career games where he's failed to complete at least 50% of his passes. The Ravens are 6-6 in those games. Freeman has had 8 such games. The Bucs are 1-7 in them. Flacco has had 49 games where he has thrown 0-1 TD passes. The Ravens are 31-18 (.633) in those games. Freeman has had 34 such games. The Bucs are 10-24 (.417) in those games. You want to know what the difference has been? The caliber of the other 21 players that line up with them each week, and the caliber of the coaches calling the shots on the sidelines.The bottom line is that if Flacco were a Buccaneer and Freeman a Raven, the title of this thread would be Flacco "ELITE" QB and you all would be telling us how much better Freeman was than him.Flacco's performance over his career has been noting more than adequate with possible exception of this year's playoffs. He has played on a really good team though. Nice post CBW.
Dennis Pitta....he was #17 on my favorite 50. Guess not all my picks are busts.
You were simply too smart for me.
Quote from: Boid Fink on February 07, 2013, 09:27:18 AMFlacco in the same category as Jackson5? Gawd. Makes me cringe reading stupid on that level.Start cringing. Quote from: Boid Fink on May 09, 2011, 11:08:21 PMIf the Ravens had Freeman, they might be yearly contenders for the Lombardi. Flacco, for some reason to me, doesn'tmake me think "great QB". Thus the ranking, despite his resume.
Flacco in the same category as Jackson5? Gawd. Makes me cringe reading stupid on that level.
If the Ravens had Freeman, they might be yearly contenders for the Lombardi. Flacco, for some reason to me, doesn'tmake me think "great QB". Thus the ranking, despite his resume.
FRG is the most logical poster on this board. You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.
Quote from: Feel Real Good on February 07, 2013, 10:15:18 AMQuote from: Boid Fink on February 07, 2013, 09:27:18 AMFlacco in the same category as Jackson5? Gawd. Makes me cringe reading stupid on that level.Start cringing. Quote from: Boid Fink on May 09, 2011, 11:08:21 PMIf the Ravens had Freeman, they might be yearly contenders for the Lombardi. Flacco, for some reason to me, doesn'tmake me think "great QB". Thus the ranking, despite his resume.Is anyone going to answer for this?
In 2010 and 2011, Flacco had three playoff games of four where his QB rating was 95 or higher. He has had only two home playoff games so he has succeeded in tough places against tough teams. He has nine playoff wins. To compare him to Josh is a joke.
Quote from: jerseybucsfan on February 08, 2013, 04:15:43 PMIn 2010 and 2011, Flacco had three playoff games of four where his QB rating was 95 or higher. He has had only two home playoff games so he has succeeded in tough places against tough teams. He has nine playoff wins. To compare him to Josh is a joke.I dont think they are a joke. In my opinion Flacco has played on much better teams than Freeman has. I think if you put Flacco on our team he would have similar stats as Freeman with likely the same record. You need solid QB play but your team needs to be good too. Would you consider any of our teams Freeman has been on to be any good? I dont. Mediocre at best but really bad at the worst. Flacco has played better recently but that doesnt mean that Freeman cant. Arent you curious how Freeman would be on a decent team??
Quote from: BucBalla85 on February 08, 2013, 04:19:56 PMQuote from: jerseybucsfan on February 08, 2013, 04:15:43 PMIn 2010 and 2011, Flacco had three playoff games of four where his QB rating was 95 or higher. He has had only two home playoff games so he has succeeded in tough places against tough teams. He has nine playoff wins. To compare him to Josh is a joke.I dont think they are a joke. In my opinion Flacco has played on much better teams than Freeman has. I think if you put Flacco on our team he would have similar stats as Freeman with likely the same record. You need solid QB play but your team needs to be good too. Would you consider any of our teams Freeman has been on to be any good? I dont. Mediocre at best but really bad at the worst. Flacco has played better recently but that doesnt mean that Freeman cant. Arent you curious how Freeman would be on a decent team??..but Flacco still is a better passer than Freeman. The problem is that sometimes he makes some of the same boneheaded mistakes and will overshoot his intended target. Neither QB is elite, but the edge still goes to Flacco. Stats don't, and never do, tell the whole story. I think if you put Flacco on the '10 team, you may have seen the Bucs in the playoffs.