Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: CBWx2 on October 11, 2011, 12:40:30 PMQuote from: JavaRay on October 11, 2011, 12:00:59 PMMason Foster really got exposed in that game. Other than getting rid of Barrett Ruud being a mistake, what did they learn?They learned that the sentiment that Ruud leaving would be addition through subtraction was a bunch of nonsense. Tennesee is ranked 10th against the run. We're 22nd. Who's fault is it now?Well first, since you're using YPA, the Bucs are 20th not 22nd. Now let's look at this addition by subtraction "bunch of nonsense" for both Tampa and Tennessee.BucsWith Ruud in 2010: 31st in rush defense (YPA)W/O Ruud in 2011: 20th in rush defense (YPA)TitansW/O Ruud in 2010: 7th in rush defense (YPA)With Ruud in 2011: 10th in rush defense (YPA)Imagine that. Tampa's getting better and Tennessee's getting worse.
Quote from: JavaRay on October 11, 2011, 12:00:59 PMMason Foster really got exposed in that game. Other than getting rid of Barrett Ruud being a mistake, what did they learn?They learned that the sentiment that Ruud leaving would be addition through subtraction was a bunch of nonsense. Tennesee is ranked 10th against the run. We're 22nd. Who's fault is it now?
Mason Foster really got exposed in that game. Other than getting rid of Barrett Ruud being a mistake, what did they learn?
But the point is, how come they are virtually unaffected in run defense having changed from Tulloch to Ruud, which all of you swear is a huge downgrade, meanwhile, we are virtually unaffected in run defense from Ruud to Foster, which all of you swear is a huge upgrade? Who's fault is it? I'm just curious.
Quote from: CBWx2 on October 11, 2011, 01:37:25 PMBut the point is, how come they are virtually unaffected in run defense having changed from Tulloch to Ruud, which all of you swear is a huge downgrade, meanwhile, we are virtually unaffected in run defense from Ruud to Foster, which all of you swear is a huge upgrade? Who's fault is it? I'm just curious.I have no idea if Foster is the solution, but we didn't draft him to do better than Ruud weeks 1-5 of the 2011 season. We drafted him for what he may be able to do the next 10 years.
Who cares about Ruud he's gone and thank god too.
Quote from: BucBalla85 on October 11, 2011, 02:22:40 PMWho cares about Ruud he's gone and thank god too.Honestly I'm floored anyone can watch both Foster and Ruud play and not have the difference slap them silly. But the Ruud-lovers are dedicated bunch.
I actually do see the difference, and I've said as much. What I've also said is that that difference hasn't mattered much
You and the Ruud haters continue to live in this world of "Ruud or Foster" when the best thing for our defense would have been Ruud AND Foster. Foster should have taken Hayes job, not Ruud's. His aggressiveness and gap play would have been an asset at WILL, and his coverage limitations and lack of experience in the scheme would have been less of a negative there.