Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
I usually shop at a market basket in londonderry nh. It is a affluent bedroom community here and when we were house shopping 5 years ago they started around 280k. Food stamp day is the 5th of every month and ive stupidly have gone there on that day. I am surprised the fire marshall allows that many people in the store at one time. There is a youtube video for grand opening market basket londonderry. Its just like it.
I'm not saying nobody deserves food stamps. I'm just curious how much they get each month. I literally have no idea.
First, no one is getting rich or has it made because of Food Stamps (SNAP). Typically the benefits are around $150-$200/month, not much considering the skyrocketing cost of food especially meats. SANP can only be used for food and not prepared or hot foods (like fried chicken or rotisserie chicken at Publix, even though it is cheaper than the raw chicken).Second, the HDTV thing is irrelevant. I buy my mom, who is living solely on a paltry SS check, a HDTV. If she sells it for $300, that is gone in under a month and now she has no TV unless she buys a CRT TV for $150. So saying she should use a stop-gap solution instead of a long term solution is short sighted. Now if a recipient BUYS a $1000 TV that is a different story.Third, sure their are some that abuse the system, but that is not the biggest problem or cost. My biggest gripe is it takes around $45 to administer every $100 of benefits. My complaint isn't a welfare recipient having a HDTV, it is the welfare office needing an HDTV in their break room, and needing HD Computer screens to do their work, and needing new computers and software every other year, or their needing ergonomic chairs at their mahogany desks.Fourth my other big concern about any entitlement program is it breeds a culture of dependency without creating any incentives or support system to get off the teat. As posted above, people don't want to get a job as a roofer for fear of losing the UE benefits they have become dependent on. The benefit programs need to be structured so there is a "weaning" process so that taking a new job isn't a bigger risk than staying unemployed.
Quote from: JavaRay on November 02, 2011, 03:33:19 PMI'm not saying nobody deserves food stamps. I'm just curious how much they get each month. I literally have no idea.I've been involved in the grocery business and I've seen plenty in the $200-300 range. The funny thing is they don't ration it out over the month. They blow it all at once and always on the first day they can use them.
Quote from: CBWx2 on November 02, 2011, 03:42:47 PM How much did we give to either of those countries prior to 2001 and 2003?I don't really care to look it up, but I'm willing to bet America still gave more money overseas than the vast majority of countries on the planet, if not all, in 2001 and 2003 - however those years were cherry-picked.
How much did we give to either of those countries prior to 2001 and 2003?
Quote from: CBWx2 on November 02, 2011, 03:42:47 PMActually, for 2009 that leaves approximately $18 billion. 28 minus 5 doesn't equal 18.
Actually, for 2009 that leaves approximately $18 billion.
Quote from: CBWx2 on November 02, 2011, 03:42:47 PMAnd the "extremely limited" statement was in reference to domestic welfare. You chose to make it about something else, and quite frankly, you've failed to legitimize your point any more in doing so.Is that right? So which country on this planet spends more money on Social Programs domestically?And 14% of the budget is going towards "Safety Net Programs"QuoteSafety net programs: About 14 percent of the federal budget in 2010, or $496 billion, went to support programs that provide aid (other than health insurance or Social Security benefits) to individuals and families facing hardship.These programs include: the refundable portion of the earned-income and child tax credits, which assist low- and moderate-income working families through the tax code; programs that provide cash payments to eligible individuals or households, including Supplemental Security Income for the elderly or disabled poor and unemployment insurance; various forms of in-kind assistance for low-income families and individuals, including food stamps, school meals, low-income housing assistance, child-care assistance, and assistance in meeting home energy bills; and various other programs such as those that aid abused and neglected children.A Center analysis shows that such programs kept approximately 15 million Americans out of poverty in 2005 and reduced the depth of poverty for another 29 million people. (Such programs likely kept even more Americans out of poverty since the recession began. For example, seven provisions of the Recovery Act enacted in February 2009 kept more than 6 million additional people out of poverty in 2009, according to a Center analysis.)I know this is like asking a fat kid how many pizzas he should be allowed to eat, but exactly how much of the budget should be set aside for Social Programs?
And the "extremely limited" statement was in reference to domestic welfare. You chose to make it about something else, and quite frankly, you've failed to legitimize your point any more in doing so.
Safety net programs: About 14 percent of the federal budget in 2010, or $496 billion, went to support programs that provide aid (other than health insurance or Social Security benefits) to individuals and families facing hardship.These programs include: the refundable portion of the earned-income and child tax credits, which assist low- and moderate-income working families through the tax code; programs that provide cash payments to eligible individuals or households, including Supplemental Security Income for the elderly or disabled poor and unemployment insurance; various forms of in-kind assistance for low-income families and individuals, including food stamps, school meals, low-income housing assistance, child-care assistance, and assistance in meeting home energy bills; and various other programs such as those that aid abused and neglected children.A Center analysis shows that such programs kept approximately 15 million Americans out of poverty in 2005 and reduced the depth of poverty for another 29 million people. (Such programs likely kept even more Americans out of poverty since the recession began. For example, seven provisions of the Recovery Act enacted in February 2009 kept more than 6 million additional people out of poverty in 2009, according to a Center analysis.)
Quote from: Skull and Bones on November 02, 2011, 08:42:51 PMQuote from: JavaRay on November 02, 2011, 03:33:19 PMI'm not saying nobody deserves food stamps. I'm just curious how much they get each month. I literally have no idea.I've been involved in the grocery business and I've seen plenty in the $200-300 range. The funny thing is they don't ration it out over the month. They blow it all at once and always on the first day they can use them.Yep. Which is exactly why they're on food stamps in the first place. So what do we do? We reward people who can't budget their money or live within their means and making the working idiots pay for it.
Quote from: Biggs3535 on November 02, 2011, 04:35:59 PMI know this is like asking a fat kid how many pizzas he should be allowed to eat, but exactly how much of the budget should be set aside for Social Programs?I'd say 2/3rds of the $1.5 trillion in total expenditures
I know this is like asking a fat kid how many pizzas he should be allowed to eat, but exactly how much of the budget should be set aside for Social Programs?
and the better question is why are almost all food stampers obese? they ain't missing any meals.