Welcome, Guest
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Time to write off Gerald McCoy « previous next »
Page: 1 2 3 ... 11

MiltonMack21

User is on moderator watch listWatched
******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 9254
Offline
: November 06, 2011, 02:37:14 PM

Well on his way to missing more than half of his second season. It is time to write this guy off as the injury prone bust he is. He shouldn't be on the roster next season. Goodby Gerald you sorry soft piece of garbage. Ohh and today.. the Yucs defensive line is getting OWNED. When you have very little talent and play with even less heart, this is what happens.


jerseybucsfan

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 13595
Offline
#1 : November 06, 2011, 02:38:19 PM

Told ya Suh would be dramatically better. Some of you clowns said McCoy would be better. No way, no chance. Not better quality wise, not better quantity wise. He's a 38 Double D.

In Verner We Trust

MUSCLE_HAMSTER

User is on moderator watch listWatched
*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 8201
Offline
#2 : November 06, 2011, 02:42:36 PM

Told ya Suh would be dramatically better. Some of you clowns said McCoy would be better. No way, no chance. Not better quality wise, not better quantity wise. He's a 38 Double D.
Great job by you! Went out on a limb saying Suh would be better, took some real balls on that call.

Who gives a **CENSORED** if you thought player A would be better than player B.

A Buc is a Buc, deal with it.


carrollwoodbucsfan

**
Rookie

Posts : 45
Offline
#3 : November 06, 2011, 02:43:02 PM

mccoy has played 18 games and has 4 sacks , that means he gets one sack every 4 or 5 games  trully pathetic oh ya raheem morris record 16-21 after today

Pepsi

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 3025
Offline
#4 : November 06, 2011, 02:43:50 PM

Told ya Suh would be dramatically better. Some of you clowns said McCoy would be better. No way, no chance. Not better quality wise, not better quantity wise. He's a 38 Double D.

Your're an idioit, everyone knew that Suh would be way better. He was picked before us and the next best DT was McCoy. It was the only thing we could do...  You really tried an "I told ya so"...



SunnyD

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 8586
Offline
#5 : November 06, 2011, 02:44:53 PM

We never had an oppurtunity to draft Suh.

Move along, nothing to see here. 


JavaRay

User is banned from postingMuted
******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 17206
Offline
#6 : November 06, 2011, 02:46:53 PM

everyone knew that Suh would be way better.

Bull.   Are you new to this forum?   LOTS of people on here were saying McCoy would be a better pick because he was a better fit for the defense.   Especially after the pick was made (homers).


Feel Real Good

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 27594
Online
#7 : November 06, 2011, 02:59:46 PM

Told ya Suh would be dramatically better. Some of you clowns said McCoy would be better. No way, no chance. Not better quality wise, not better quantity wise. He's a 38 Double D.

Your're an idioit, everyone knew that Suh would be way better. He was picked before us and the next best DT was McCoy. It was the only thing we could do...  You really tried an "I told ya so"...
No, you pick the best player available, period, not the next best DT.

FRG is the most logical poster on this board.  You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.

acacius

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 4918
Offline
#8 : November 06, 2011, 03:05:51 PM

Told ya Suh would be dramatically better. Some of you clowns said McCoy would be better. No way, no chance. Not better quality wise, not better quantity wise. He's a 38 Double D.

Your're an idioit, everyone knew that Suh would be way better. He was picked before us and the next best DT was McCoy. It was the only thing we could do...  You really tried an "I told ya so"...
No, you pick the best player available, period, not the next best DT.
Which, conveniently enough, was the same person.

Snook

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 9083
Offline
#9 : November 06, 2011, 03:09:22 PM

Time to OFFICIALLY write off McCoy too.

Its clear why the players like him so much... because he apparently doesn't make the players do anything during the week.


Feel Real Good

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 27594
Online
#10 : November 06, 2011, 03:14:08 PM

Told ya Suh would be dramatically better. Some of you clowns said McCoy would be better. No way, no chance. Not better quality wise, not better quantity wise. He's a 38 Double D.

Your're an idioit, everyone knew that Suh would be way better. He was picked before us and the next best DT was McCoy. It was the only thing we could do...  You really tried an "I told ya so"...
No, you pick the best player available, period, not the next best DT.
Which, conveniently enough, was the same person.
Are you still sure about that?

FRG is the most logical poster on this board.  You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.

MUSCLE_HAMSTER

User is on moderator watch listWatched
*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 8201
Offline
#11 : November 06, 2011, 03:15:30 PM

Told ya Suh would be dramatically better. Some of you clowns said McCoy would be better. No way, no chance. Not better quality wise, not better quantity wise. He's a 38 Double D.

Your're an idioit, everyone knew that Suh would be way better. He was picked before us and the next best DT was McCoy. It was the only thing we could do...  You really tried an "I told ya so"...
No, you pick the best player available, period, not the next best DT.
Which, conveniently enough, was the same person.
Are you still sure about that?
At the time of the draft, it was unquestionable. End of discussion.


Feel Real Good

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 27594
Online
#12 : November 06, 2011, 03:20:40 PM

Told ya Suh would be dramatically better. Some of you clowns said McCoy would be better. No way, no chance. Not better quality wise, not better quantity wise. He's a 38 Double D.

Your're an idioit, everyone knew that Suh would be way better. He was picked before us and the next best DT was McCoy. It was the only thing we could do...  You really tried an "I told ya so"...
No, you pick the best player available, period, not the next best DT.
Which, conveniently enough, was the same person.
Are you still sure about that?
At the time of the draft, it was unquestionable. End of discussion.
Then why have a GM if you're just going to do what "everyone" says you should do? Joel and Bryan could fire Dominik and just do whatever Mel Kiper says to do and save a lot of money. I want my GM to get whoever is BPA 2-3 years later. If there is no accountability for how players turn out 2-3 years later, we could have just kept Bruce Allen. His picks seemed great on draft day, too.

FRG is the most logical poster on this board.  You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.

jerseybucsfan

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 13595
Offline
#13 : November 06, 2011, 04:00:07 PM

I knew I'd get ripped by you lemming morons. I didn't like the pick at the time and still don't like it.
Call me all the names you like because Java is right: a LOT of people said McCoy would be as good or better.
+1 to FRG. A lot of people said Adams was the right pick too and how did that work out?

In Verner We Trust

MUSCLE_HAMSTER

User is on moderator watch listWatched
*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 8201
Offline
#14 : November 06, 2011, 04:02:21 PM

Told ya Suh would be dramatically better. Some of you clowns said McCoy would be better. No way, no chance. Not better quality wise, not better quantity wise. He's a 38 Double D.

Your're an idioit, everyone knew that Suh would be way better. He was picked before us and the next best DT was McCoy. It was the only thing we could do...  You really tried an "I told ya so"...
No, you pick the best player available, period, not the next best DT.
Which, conveniently enough, was the same person.
Are you still sure about that?
At the time of the draft, it was unquestionable. End of discussion.
Then why have a GM if you're just going to do what "everyone" says you should do? Joel and Bryan could fire Dominik and just do whatever Mel Kiper says to do and save a lot of money. I want my GM to get whoever is BPA 2-3 years later. If there is no accountability for how players turn out 2-3 years later, we could have just kept Bruce Allen. His picks seemed great on draft day, too.
Trolling is an art. You haven't mastered it yet.

Page: 1 2 3 ... 11
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Time to write off Gerald McCoy « previous next »
:

Hide Tools Show Tools