Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
an honest question here: How would moving him to the outside help?
To me this all goes back to the coaching and GM ...remember in preseason we had Foster and McKenzie fighting for that MLB spot. Both performed pretty much the same in the games, but even PR was reporting how good McKenzie looked in training camp. The thought process was that McKenzie should be the MLB and Foster moved over to OLB spot. But Raheem didn't want that as he had his guys (Hayes and the Cheetah) already written into those spots. So essentially they handed the starting MLB spot to Foster as he was a high profile draft pick. When McKenzie spoke up about getting passed over due to draft status and not actual performance he was quickly dumped by this regime. At the time Radio/Dom stated it was because they felt McKenzie would not get any better and he is not making any "splash" plays ...how many has Foster made so far this season ...2??? Looking at our pathetic LB corps I would love to have seen if they would be any better with McKenzie at MLB, Foster at one OLB spot and then take you pick off the garbage pile for the other ...my gut tells me it would have been an improvement ..and still young and hungry so they continue to be part of the "plan". This was plain and simple Radio dumping a guy that wasn't one of his "buddies", and it cost the team in performance and talent level.
Quote from: JohnBuc06 on December 18, 2011, 09:27:50 AMTo me this all goes back to the coaching and GM ...remember in preseason we had Foster and McKenzie fighting for that MLB spot. Both performed pretty much the same in the games, but even PR was reporting how good McKenzie looked in training camp. The thought process was that McKenzie should be the MLB and Foster moved over to OLB spot. But Raheem didn't want that as he had his guys (Hayes and the Cheetah) already written into those spots. So essentially they handed the starting MLB spot to Foster as he was a high profile draft pick. When McKenzie spoke up about getting passed over due to draft status and not actual performance he was quickly dumped by this regime. At the time Radio/Dom stated it was because they felt McKenzie would not get any better and he is not making any "splash" plays ...how many has Foster made so far this season ...2??? Looking at our pathetic LB corps I would love to have seen if they would be any better with McKenzie at MLB, Foster at one OLB spot and then take you pick off the garbage pile for the other ...my gut tells me it would have been an improvement ..and still young and hungry so they continue to be part of the "plan". This was plain and simple Radio dumping a guy that wasn't one of his "buddies", and it cost the team in performance and talent level.I think PR completely misinterpreted McKenzie. He's now down the depth chart on the Vikes roster. If we're complaining about a guy who barely belongs in the league not being part of the LBer rotation then it's not worth the discussion. McKenzie wasn't going to make a difference.
Quote from: ryan24 on December 18, 2011, 03:55:19 PMQuote from: JohnBuc06 on December 18, 2011, 09:27:50 AMTo me this all goes back to the coaching and GM ...remember in preseason we had Foster and McKenzie fighting for that MLB spot. Both performed pretty much the same in the games, but even PR was reporting how good McKenzie looked in training camp. The thought process was that McKenzie should be the MLB and Foster moved over to OLB spot. But Raheem didn't want that as he had his guys (Hayes and the Cheetah) already written into those spots. So essentially they handed the starting MLB spot to Foster as he was a high profile draft pick. When McKenzie spoke up about getting passed over due to draft status and not actual performance he was quickly dumped by this regime. At the time Radio/Dom stated it was because they felt McKenzie would not get any better and he is not making any "splash" plays ...how many has Foster made so far this season ...2??? Looking at our pathetic LB corps I would love to have seen if they would be any better with McKenzie at MLB, Foster at one OLB spot and then take you pick off the garbage pile for the other ...my gut tells me it would have been an improvement ..and still young and hungry so they continue to be part of the "plan". This was plain and simple Radio dumping a guy that wasn't one of his "buddies", and it cost the team in performance and talent level.I think PR completely misinterpreted McKenzie. He's now down the depth chart on the Vikes roster. If we're complaining about a guy who barely belongs in the league not being part of the LBer rotation then it's not worth the discussion. McKenzie wasn't going to make a difference.I have to agree. But it does show Morris/Dom M.O. and favoritism.
Man some of our fans are stupid.. What do you expect from a rookie MLB? He has done a decent job. Yes, he has struggled but you respect that from a rookie MLB especially one who has switched positions from OLB. I'm not worried about Foster he is one of my few worries on our defense. He has showed some potential and thats all you can really ask from him at this point.