Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
I think he should be gone but a hunch is telling me he is brought back for one more year. The lockout with no offseason and no help outside of the draft may clinch him another year.
Rah is like the substitute teacher that everyone likes but no one respects.
Quote from: Madman on December 22, 2011, 11:48:23 AMRah is like the substitute teacher that everyone likes but no one respects.Where half the class takes hour long bathroom breaks with no resistance....probably exactly what happens during film breakdown..."Hay Rah!!, I gotta go take a leak...BRB."
Quote from: TheChronicHotAir on December 22, 2011, 10:24:16 AMI feel like i need to shower again after reading your post.Especially after hearing "Mason Foster is the foundation of this defense".
I feel like i need to shower again after reading your post.
I don't normally agree with Sparky, but the point of continuity is always worth considering. Given how undisciplined and how they have simply given up in games, however, it's tough to hold firm on that case. I could handle being 6-8 right now with only a few duds. But they have looked terrible in more than half their games. Then one must examine last year's 10-6 season. Hey, 10 wins is 10 wins. But based on their point differential and strength of schedule, they played like a team that would win 8.7 games. Generally that doesn't concern me. But their wins OFTEN seem more like gifts than good efforts: Cincy turning it over multiple times late after outplaying the Bucs for most of the game, the St. Louis fiasco (with one of the worst first halves by a Bucs team prior to this season), the Washington slop in the rain (won when they couldn't attempt the tying extra point), etc. Often a team gains confidence from such wins and then gets better (only to win fewer games). But that's not what happened. The Bucs have regressed in virtually every regard. Most of all, the offseason argument is a copout in that they looked far better in September and October. How do you explain the Atlanta and NO wins? My gut feeling watching this team the last two months is that they're actually WORSE than 4-10. Teams that play consistently 14-21 points behind are bad and when you almost never score in the first quarter, the results are inevitable. So under most circumstances Sparky would be right, but I humbly and respectfully must disagree with him. This is a trend you want to nip in the bud now. The Bucs look horrific. And that calls for massive changes because it's not going to bear fruit in one year or five.