Boards Recent Discussions Help Search RSS WAP2
Welcome, Guest
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Sports Illustrated Grades the 7 New Head Coaching Hires « previous next »
Page: 1 2 3 4

Feel Real Good

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 23423
Offline
« #15 : November 19, 2012, 08:42:17 AM »
Great bump.
Quote from: Skull and Bones on June 12, 2013, 04:04:30 PM
FRG is the most logical poster on this board.  You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.

OneTruth

*****
Pro Bowler

Posts : 1684
Offline
« #16 : November 19, 2012, 08:43:38 AM »
opinions are like belly buttons...

blind melon

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 11926
Offline
« #17 : November 19, 2012, 09:06:08 AM »
Who wrote that POS?

yikes.
“The opinions that are held with passion are always those for which no good ground exists; indeed the passion is the measure of the holder’s lack of rational conviction.”
— Bertrand Russell

TBayXXXVII

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 5020
Offline
« #18 : November 19, 2012, 09:27:36 AM »
Just because the guy is wrong with respect to Schiano (so far), doesn't mean the guy is wrong all over.  I think his grades for the other 6 are so far panning out to be accurate.  You can't really call him right or wrong on KC (Crennel), yet.  In this league you need 1 of 2 things to win... a great defense or a good QB.  Kansas City is (and was in January), 2-3 years away from both of those.  As for the other 5, I think his initial assessment is holding to form.  Just as with his stance on KC, you can't really say he's wrong on Schiano even though the early returns suggest that he is.  It's only been 10 games.

Feel Real Good

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 23423
Offline
« #19 : November 19, 2012, 09:37:13 AM »
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on November 19, 2012, 09:27:36 AM
Just because the guy is wrong with respect to Schiano (so far), doesn't mean the guy is wrong all over.  I think his grades for the other 6 are so far panning out to be accurate.  You can't really call him right or wrong on KC (Crennel), yet.  In this league you need 1 of 2 things to win... a great defense or a good QB.  Kansas City is (and was in January), 2-3 years away from both of those.  As for the other 5, I think his initial assessment is holding to form.  Just as with his stance on KC, you can't really say he's wrong on Schiano even though the early returns suggest that he is.  It's only been 10 games.
KC won 7 games last season. This year they have the worst point differential in the NFL. They're on pace top finish with a worse point differential than the 2011 Bucs.
Quote from: Skull and Bones on June 12, 2013, 04:04:30 PM
FRG is the most logical poster on this board.  You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.

TBayXXXVII

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 5020
Offline
« #20 : November 19, 2012, 09:39:32 AM »
Quote from: Feel Real Good on November 19, 2012, 09:37:13 AM
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on November 19, 2012, 09:27:36 AM
Just because the guy is wrong with respect to Schiano (so far), doesn't mean the guy is wrong all over.  I think his grades for the other 6 are so far panning out to be accurate.  You can't really call him right or wrong on KC (Crennel), yet.  In this league you need 1 of 2 things to win... a great defense or a good QB.  Kansas City is (and was in January), 2-3 years away from both of those.  As for the other 5, I think his initial assessment is holding to form.  Just as with his stance on KC, you can't really say he's wrong on Schiano even though the early returns suggest that he is.  It's only been 10 games.
KC won 7 games last season. This year they have the worst point differential in the NFL. They're on pace top finish with a worse point differential than the 2011 Bucs.

Again, it's 10 games.

Feel Real Good

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 23423
Offline
« #21 : November 19, 2012, 09:47:59 AM »
And through 10 games they're worse than the 2011 Bucs.
Quote from: Skull and Bones on June 12, 2013, 04:04:30 PM
FRG is the most logical poster on this board.  You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.

TBayXXXVII

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 5020
Offline
« #22 : November 19, 2012, 10:09:39 AM »
Quote from: Feel Real Good on November 19, 2012, 09:47:59 AM
And through 10 games they're worse than the 2011 Bucs.

So that means that automatically, Crennel is a total failure and writer of the article is an idiot?

OneTruth

*****
Pro Bowler

Posts : 1684
Offline
« #23 : November 19, 2012, 10:14:32 AM »
with the information obtained so far.... yes.

3rd String Kicker

Moderator
*****
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 6578
Offline
« #24 : November 19, 2012, 10:15:12 AM »
For a second I thought these were current and was ready to never read SI ever again. At least now I know these are from January and will never read SI ever again.

Feel Real Good

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 23423
Offline
« #25 : November 19, 2012, 10:16:32 AM »
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on November 19, 2012, 10:09:39 AM
Quote from: Feel Real Good on November 19, 2012, 09:47:59 AM
And through 10 games they're worse than the 2011 Bucs.

So that means that automatically, Crennel is a total failure and writer of the article is an idiot?
I don't see how you can say hiring Crennel to be the full time coach wasn't a total failure.
Quote from: Skull and Bones on June 12, 2013, 04:04:30 PM
FRG is the most logical poster on this board.  You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.

Hate

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 35708
Offline
« #26 : November 19, 2012, 10:24:27 AM »
Quote from: cyberdude558 on November 19, 2012, 06:39:32 AM
But Crennel and Mularkey are really bad. I know Jax took Houston to OT yesterday, but its one of only very few bright spots on a horrible season.

Jax's problem is Gabbert. If Henne was playing all along, they'd have a few more wins....IMO.
-------------------------------------------------------
   
              Its playoffs or bust - 2013 has got to be the No Excuses Tour

GameTime

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 16616
Offline
« #27 : November 19, 2012, 10:37:44 AM »
switch crennel and schiano grades and the list aint half bad!

and as hate pointed out, if gabbert doesnt play again mularkey might look a lot better as a coach.
\"Lets put the O back in Country\"

Bucpride5

*
Pro Bowler
*****
Posts : 1435
Offline
« #28 : November 19, 2012, 10:49:58 AM »

1. Romeo Crennel, Chiefs: 1-9

2. Joe Philbin, Dolphins: 4-6

3. Jeff Fisher, Rams: 3-6-1

4. Chuck Pagano, Colts: 6-4 (Currently not coaching, but inspiring team)

5. Mike Mularkey, Jaguars: 1-9

6. Dennis Allen, Raiders: 3-7

7. Greg Schiano, Buccaneers: 6-4

After 10 games, I like the Bucs hire, and am def excited the direction the team is heading.
Formerly known as T

Welcome to the Pewterreport.com forum where logic & reason do not exist

TBayXXXVII

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 5020
Offline
« #29 : November 19, 2012, 11:24:19 AM »
Quote from: Feel Real Good on November 19, 2012, 10:16:32 AM
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on November 19, 2012, 10:09:39 AM
Quote from: Feel Real Good on November 19, 2012, 09:47:59 AM
And through 10 games they're worse than the 2011 Bucs.

So that means that automatically, Crennel is a total failure and writer of the article is an idiot?
I don't see how you can say hiring Crennel to be the full time coach wasn't a total failure.

Because it's only been 10 games.
  Page: 1 2 3 4
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Sports Illustrated Grades the 7 New Head Coaching Hires « previous next »
:  

Copyright © 2010 Pewter Report, PewterReport.com and Pewter Insider. All Rights Reserved.
Hide Tools Show Tools