Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: BayAreaBuc on February 20, 2012, 09:09:38 PMlol mike wallace for the #5 pick? hell noPeople overvalue draft picks.Sincerely, Dan Snyder
lol mike wallace for the #5 pick? hell no
Quote from: dalbuc on February 20, 2012, 09:21:12 PMQuote from: BayAreaBuc on February 20, 2012, 09:09:38 PMlol mike wallace for the #5 pick? hell noPeople overvalue draft picks.Sincerely, Dan SnyderFTFY
Quote from: BucsFan4090 on February 20, 2012, 10:15:48 PMQuote from: dalbuc on February 20, 2012, 09:21:12 PMQuote from: BayAreaBuc on February 20, 2012, 09:09:38 PMlol mike wallace for the #5 pick? hell noPeople overvalue draft picks.Sincerely, Dan SnyderFTFYHe has a point IMO. You can have the sure thing in Mike Wallace or take a gamble on say...Blackmon.
Quote from: The Anti-Java on February 20, 2012, 10:21:34 PMQuote from: BucsFan4090 on February 20, 2012, 10:15:48 PMQuote from: dalbuc on February 20, 2012, 09:21:12 PMQuote from: BayAreaBuc on February 20, 2012, 09:09:38 PMlol mike wallace for the #5 pick? hell noPeople overvalue draft picks.Sincerely, Dan SnyderFTFYHe has a point IMO. You can have the sure thing in Mike Wallace or take a gamble on say...Blackmon.There is no sure thing in any sport. Mike Clayton taught us that. No guarantee that he comes here and does anything close to what he did in Pittsburgh.All it does is make you feel safer about the possibility of him not sucking.
I think he's certainly worth it if they can trade down and pick up some other assets as well. If that's not a possibility, I'd rather not trade the fifth pick for him, even though his skill set is pretty much exactly what the team needs.
I actually think he is from a talent perspective but realistically you are not going to give him a 3rd contract. so 5-6 years is probably all you get out of the pick so no. Drafting someone that can give you 10 years is better.
Quote from: Skull and Bones on February 21, 2012, 03:07:05 AMI actually think he is from a talent perspective but realistically you are not going to give him a 3rd contract. so 5-6 years is probably all you get out of the pick so no. Drafting someone that can give you 10 years is better.But Wallace is a sure thing and will give you a minimum of 5-6 years. There's no gaurantee that the player drafted will even give you 3... or the production.
Quote from: TBayXXXVII on February 21, 2012, 08:56:30 AMQuote from: Skull and Bones on February 21, 2012, 03:07:05 AMI actually think he is from a talent perspective but realistically you are not going to give him a 3rd contract. so 5-6 years is probably all you get out of the pick so no. Drafting someone that can give you 10 years is better.But Wallace is a sure thing and will give you a minimum of 5-6 years. There's no gaurantee that the player drafted will even give you 3... or the production.Agree. I am starting to warm up to the idea. That is, if they picked up a couple CB's in free agency beforehand.
Quote from: The Anti-Java on February 21, 2012, 10:27:07 AMQuote from: TBayXXXVII on February 21, 2012, 08:56:30 AMQuote from: Skull and Bones on February 21, 2012, 03:07:05 AMI actually think he is from a talent perspective but realistically you are not going to give him a 3rd contract. so 5-6 years is probably all you get out of the pick so no. Drafting someone that can give you 10 years is better.But Wallace is a sure thing and will give you a minimum of 5-6 years. There's no gaurantee that the player drafted will even give you 3... or the production.Agree. I am starting to warm up to the idea. That is, if they picked up a couple CB's in free agency beforehand.I'm starting to warm up to the idea that no matter who the Bucs take at #5, I'm ok with. The only thing I won't be all that happy with is if the Bucs had a chance to get Bowe or Wallace for #5, and chose to draft Blackmon instead. That, or if they drafted Richardson. Basically, I'm assuming the only realistic options are Blackmon, Kalil or Claiborne. I also wouldn't be upset with Tannehill there either, though, I'm resigned to the fact that we are stuck with Freeman for at least 1 more season.
Say we actually are active in FA and pick up either Grimes, Finnegan or Carr and someone like Nicks or Grubbs or even Gaither on the outside. Throw in a possible S like Goldson or Branch and possibly (not that it really matters) Hillis. I'm not saying all of those guys but one from each group. THEN is Mike Wallace worth #5? (barring no offers to trade back)
Except for the Tannehill part.