Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Claiborne looks smooth in all of the drills so far. Just a natural baller
I hate these stupid threads, he ran a slow 40, blah blah blah.Watch the game tape. Against elite speed at WR was he able to keep up? Can he close on the ball? Can he come up and tackle, can he cover the 9 route.The 40 is for fans, not so much for teams.
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
Quote from: BucsWin31 on February 28, 2012, 10:37:18 AMClaiborne looks smooth in all of the drills so far. Just a natural ballerYeah, Deion said he was surprised how smooth he looked considering he has a bad habit of playing high.Imagine if he learned to play low. BEAST.
Quote from: Franchise 5 on February 28, 2012, 09:19:11 AMmy first pick is claiborne..I think its more of a need then RB.. What we need to do is look at next years DB's and RB's dom likes to do that and will draft whatever is light next year.When we lack talent as we currently do unless your picking a QB you DO NOT pick for need its BPA!
my first pick is claiborne..I think its more of a need then RB.. What we need to do is look at next years DB's and RB's dom likes to do that and will draft whatever is light next year.
I will go ok the record and say this, if we can come out with Mo, Ron Brooks and Brandon Taylor our DB's would be the strength of this team. Yes all three are from LSU but all three are ballers and combine them with Tanard and Talib and we have a great group of players. To answer the question about Mo he did play against Julio, AJ and other top WR. Patrick Peterson did not play them exclusively. Mo is still developing but just think if he is this good now how good will he be in a couple of years? We would be making a huge mistake by not drafting Mo.
Quote from: Samari28 on February 28, 2012, 10:47:54 AMI will go ok the record and say this, if we can come out with Mo, Ron Brooks and Brandon Taylor our DB's would be the strength of this team. Yes all three are from LSU but all three are ballers and combine them with Tanard and Talib and we have a great group of players. To answer the question about Mo he did play against Julio, AJ and other top WR. Patrick Peterson did not play them exclusively. Mo is still developing but just think if he is this good now how good will he be in a couple of years? We would be making a huge mistake by not drafting Mo.Ive said this before and Ill continue to say it, unless he projects to a Deion Sander/Rod Woodson "eliminating" corner I dont want him at #5. #10-15 sure absolutely. Trent Richardson on the other hand is predicted by alot of scouts and personnel people to be the next most talented back after A.D and provides toughness that i don't believe Claiborne does like a corner picked that high should like a Revis. IMO
Quote from: MasterC25 on February 28, 2012, 11:02:19 AMQuote from: Samari28 on February 28, 2012, 10:47:54 AMI will go ok the record and say this, if we can come out with Mo, Ron Brooks and Brandon Taylor our DB's would be the strength of this team. Yes all three are from LSU but all three are ballers and combine them with Tanard and Talib and we have a great group of players. To answer the question about Mo he did play against Julio, AJ and other top WR. Patrick Peterson did not play them exclusively. Mo is still developing but just think if he is this good now how good will he be in a couple of years? We would be making a huge mistake by not drafting Mo.Ive said this before and Ill continue to say it, unless he projects to a Deion Sander/Rod Woodson "eliminating" corner I dont want him at #5. #10-15 sure absolutely. Trent Richardson on the other hand is predicted by alot of scouts and personnel people to be the next most talented back after A.D and provides toughness that i don't believe Claiborne does like a corner picked that high should like a Revis. IMOBlackmon or Caliborne are the most logical choices. Drafting Richardson is settling because the premium positions are off the board. Actually, I would choose DeCastro over Richardson if you want a safe pick when it comes to non premium positions.
Janoris Jenkins - 4.44
Claiborne is not an athletic freak like Patrick Peterson was, and Peterson barely went in top 5...There is a CB or two of Claiborne's talent in every draft, he isn't a once a 5 years kind of prospect like PP.
FRG is the most logical poster on this board. You guys just don\'t like where the logical conclusions take you.