Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: DanTurksGhost on March 14, 2012, 11:26:39 PMQuote from: Detrimental on March 14, 2012, 11:22:46 PMQuote from: DanTurksGhost on March 14, 2012, 11:21:02 PMKuechly is, as has been said elsewhere, one of the safest picks in the draft.That is true.He is a real football player. That's what I really like about him. While I wouldn't mind him at #5, it would be even better if the Bucs could move down a little and still get him. To me, this is a great draft to move down and pick up more picks.Do you like him more than Hightower?
Quote from: Detrimental on March 14, 2012, 11:22:46 PMQuote from: DanTurksGhost on March 14, 2012, 11:21:02 PMKuechly is, as has been said elsewhere, one of the safest picks in the draft.That is true.He is a real football player. That's what I really like about him. While I wouldn't mind him at #5, it would be even better if the Bucs could move down a little and still get him. To me, this is a great draft to move down and pick up more picks.
Quote from: DanTurksGhost on March 14, 2012, 11:21:02 PMKuechly is, as has been said elsewhere, one of the safest picks in the draft.That is true.
Kuechly is, as has been said elsewhere, one of the safest picks in the draft.
I say if Claiborne and Kalil are gone then you have a few options. Trade down if somebody really wants Tannehill or Blackmon, draft Richardson or draft Blackmon and trade a WR(Benn for a 4th??) I dunno. Just throwing ideas out there if that is the scenario.
Quote from: JDouble on March 14, 2012, 09:06:40 PMQuote from: caradoc on March 14, 2012, 08:59:12 PMQuote from: JDouble on March 14, 2012, 08:38:19 PMI've read on multiple sites that the consensus is that this draft lacks elite talent at the top....so I doubt anyone will want to trade up. We are unfortunately stuck at #5 in a draft with no elite talent. If you believe this to be true, then I say you look at the top 10 guys and take the one who makes the most sense.Count me as one who believes this to be true. After the top three the dropoff is immediate. I would really like Reiff, he would round out and provide long term talent on the line for us, but I can see Claiborne and then Martin as a very solid route. Richardson is just overrated and Blount is seriously underrated.Yeah, I wouldn't pigeon hole us into taking two or three guys if we are stuck at #5. If Kalil and Claiborne are gone, Blackmon and Richardson ARE NOT undeniably elite talents that we have to take. We could easily look at other guys like Kuechly, Kirkpatrick, Reiff, Jonathan Martin, or even Mark Barron. It really depends on what the Bucs internal board looks like, but if they have any of these guys rated as high as Blackmon or Richardson...I can see us going a totally different direction. I'm not a big fan of Kuechly, but if the Bucs are then it honestly makes more sense to take him than Richardson. We can do whatever we want though. With the new rookie wage cap it really isn't a huge investment anymore which means you can take whatever position you want.If Luke turns out to be a consensus top ten pick, then he's at about the same spot as TR AFAIC & would be a good pick.
Quote from: caradoc on March 14, 2012, 08:59:12 PMQuote from: JDouble on March 14, 2012, 08:38:19 PMI've read on multiple sites that the consensus is that this draft lacks elite talent at the top....so I doubt anyone will want to trade up. We are unfortunately stuck at #5 in a draft with no elite talent. If you believe this to be true, then I say you look at the top 10 guys and take the one who makes the most sense.Count me as one who believes this to be true. After the top three the dropoff is immediate. I would really like Reiff, he would round out and provide long term talent on the line for us, but I can see Claiborne and then Martin as a very solid route. Richardson is just overrated and Blount is seriously underrated.Yeah, I wouldn't pigeon hole us into taking two or three guys if we are stuck at #5. If Kalil and Claiborne are gone, Blackmon and Richardson ARE NOT undeniably elite talents that we have to take. We could easily look at other guys like Kuechly, Kirkpatrick, Reiff, Jonathan Martin, or even Mark Barron. It really depends on what the Bucs internal board looks like, but if they have any of these guys rated as high as Blackmon or Richardson...I can see us going a totally different direction. I'm not a big fan of Kuechly, but if the Bucs are then it honestly makes more sense to take him than Richardson. We can do whatever we want though. With the new rookie wage cap it really isn't a huge investment anymore which means you can take whatever position you want.
Quote from: JDouble on March 14, 2012, 08:38:19 PMI've read on multiple sites that the consensus is that this draft lacks elite talent at the top....so I doubt anyone will want to trade up. We are unfortunately stuck at #5 in a draft with no elite talent. If you believe this to be true, then I say you look at the top 10 guys and take the one who makes the most sense.Count me as one who believes this to be true. After the top three the dropoff is immediate. I would really like Reiff, he would round out and provide long term talent on the line for us, but I can see Claiborne and then Martin as a very solid route. Richardson is just overrated and Blount is seriously underrated.
I've read on multiple sites that the consensus is that this draft lacks elite talent at the top....so I doubt anyone will want to trade up. We are unfortunately stuck at #5 in a draft with no elite talent. If you believe this to be true, then I say you look at the top 10 guys and take the one who makes the most sense.
Quote from: dbucfan on March 14, 2012, 11:40:42 PMQuote from: DanTurksGhost on March 14, 2012, 11:26:39 PMQuote from: Detrimental on March 14, 2012, 11:22:46 PMQuote from: DanTurksGhost on March 14, 2012, 11:21:02 PMKuechly is, as has been said elsewhere, one of the safest picks in the draft.That is true.He is a real football player. That's what I really like about him. While I wouldn't mind him at #5, it would be even better if the Bucs could move down a little and still get him. To me, this is a great draft to move down and pick up more picks.Do you like him more than Hightower? No way Hightower> KuechlyWent up against better competition in the SEC is naturally bigger, just as fast, learned under NFL style coach in Saban. Kuechly will get drafted before Hightower though.
OK, so then you're saying we should sign Lofton, take Claiborne (let's assume we don't trade down in this scenario), then hope to get Harrison Smith atop the second? RB in the third?
I'm not convinced Barron's the answer. But not a great year for safeties.
now Rick Stroud was just on the NFLN saying we should consider TR at #5.