Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: Biggs3535 on March 23, 2012, 08:47:35 PMQuote from: CBWx2 on March 23, 2012, 08:09:14 PMIf you think that law enforcement agencies make it a general policy to review every case over again after the first time, then you are woefully uninformed.Nobody said it's a general policy to review every case over and over again. When you have to jump to hyperbole such as this, you lose.What you do seem to be ignorant on is the amount of cases that are reviewed. On questionable cases such as this, it's not uncommon at all.Who calls for these cases to be reviewed? Do law enforcement agencies just do it in the interest of being thorough?
Quote from: CBWx2 on March 23, 2012, 08:09:14 PMIf you think that law enforcement agencies make it a general policy to review every case over again after the first time, then you are woefully uninformed.Nobody said it's a general policy to review every case over and over again. When you have to jump to hyperbole such as this, you lose.What you do seem to be ignorant on is the amount of cases that are reviewed. On questionable cases such as this, it's not uncommon at all.
If you think that law enforcement agencies make it a general policy to review every case over again after the first time, then you are woefully uninformed.
Quote from: Biggs3535 on March 23, 2012, 08:47:35 PMQuote from: CBWx2 on March 23, 2012, 08:09:14 PMBut what you don't get, is that the civil rights activists that organized the rally's and those that kept this in the media are the reason why this is getting looked into again. Without the hoopla, this gets swept under the rug, and Zimmerman is free to continue living out his Dirty Harry fantasies.That's quite a bit of speculation on your part. No it isn't.
Quote from: CBWx2 on March 23, 2012, 08:09:14 PMBut what you don't get, is that the civil rights activists that organized the rally's and those that kept this in the media are the reason why this is getting looked into again. Without the hoopla, this gets swept under the rug, and Zimmerman is free to continue living out his Dirty Harry fantasies.That's quite a bit of speculation on your part.
But what you don't get, is that the civil rights activists that organized the rally's and those that kept this in the media are the reason why this is getting looked into again. Without the hoopla, this gets swept under the rug, and Zimmerman is free to continue living out his Dirty Harry fantasies.
Quote from: Illuminator on March 23, 2012, 03:07:34 PMAre we still pretending this isn't about politics and race?I hardly think thats why Obama and Romney are taking an interest in this case WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama spoke out Friday on the Trayvon Martin shooting for the first time, calling the incident a “tragedy” and invoking his own children.“I can only imagine what these parents are going through,” the president said, adding that he couldn’t help but think about his daughters. “I think every parent in America should be able to understand why it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this.“My main message is to the parents of Trayvon Martin,” he added. “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon. I think they are right to expect that all of us as Americans are going to take this with the seriousness it deserves and we’re going to get to the bottom of exactly what happened.”The president said he was pleased to hear that Florida Gov. Rick Scott has appointed a task force to look into the incident.“I think all of us have to do some soul searching to figure out how does something like this happen,”Noting that his attorney general is looking into the case, the president prefaced his remarks by saying it was important he was not “impairing any investigation that’s taking place right now.”Obama’s remarks came as he stood in the Rose Garden to introduce his new choice for the president of the World Bank.They were his first remarks on the incident. The White House earlier in the week noted it was a “local” event.Travyon’s parents, Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton, issued a statement after the Obama spoke, saying it was “humbling” that the president had taken time to talk about their son.“The president's personal comments touched us deeply and made us wonder: If his son looked liked Trayvon and wore a hoodie, would he be su**CENSORED**ious too?” the statement said. “We'd like to thank the president and the millions of people from around the world who have shown their support for Trayvon by participating in hoodie marches, rallies or through social media. We are all working together to not only get justice for Trayvon, but also to ensure that this kind of senseless tragedy doesn't happen to another child.”GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney also issued a statement Friday about the case.“What happened to Trayvon Martin is a tragedy,” Romney said “There needs to be a thorough investigation that reassures the public that justice is carried out with impartiality and integrity.”Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/03/23/2709583/president-trayvon-case-a-tragedy.html#storylink=cpy
Are we still pretending this isn't about politics and race?
Illuminator is a good poster. He sticks to his guns and makes good points. Some don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'t like that.
Quote from: CBWx2 on March 23, 2012, 08:56:21 PMQuote from: Biggs3535 on March 23, 2012, 08:47:35 PMQuote from: CBWx2 on March 23, 2012, 08:09:14 PMIf you think that law enforcement agencies make it a general policy to review every case over again after the first time, then you are woefully uninformed.Nobody said it's a general policy to review every case over and over again. When you have to jump to hyperbole such as this, you lose.What you do seem to be ignorant on is the amount of cases that are reviewed. On questionable cases such as this, it's not uncommon at all.Who calls for these cases to be reviewed? Do law enforcement agencies just do it in the interest of being thorough?Yes. Reports are filed. If and when there are discrepancies, reviews and investigations are held. Police officers are put on paid leave for things like this all of the time. I see it all of the time on the local level.
Quote from: CBWx2 on March 23, 2012, 08:56:21 PMQuote from: Biggs3535 on March 23, 2012, 08:47:35 PMQuote from: CBWx2 on March 23, 2012, 08:09:14 PMBut what you don't get, is that the civil rights activists that organized the rally's and those that kept this in the media are the reason why this is getting looked into again. Without the hoopla, this gets swept under the rug, and Zimmerman is free to continue living out his Dirty Harry fantasies.That's quite a bit of speculation on your part. No it isn't.CBWx2, what you're doing here is the very definition of speculation. It's not even arguable.
The fact is, very few cases get reviewed with any degree of scrutiny unless outside factors press the issue, and virtually none get reviewed with the same degree of thoroughness that this case is getting reviewed with, now that the state and feds have gotten involved, without outside forces pressing the issue.There are roughly 90-100 "Stand Your Ground" cases each year since the law was put into place in 2007. I can't think of a single case where the state or feds got involved because of a questionable outcome besides this one, and there have been many with questionable outcomes.
What people resent is when it is turned into a race war when, at best, there is very speculative and interpreted evidence that it has anything to do with race.
The last time something like this happened and Al Sharpton injected himself into it was the Tawana Bawley and Duke Lacrosse players fiasco. I believe the same rhetoric and calls for public execution were used then. How did that turn out?
Quote from: spartan on March 24, 2012, 12:27:58 PMThe last time something like this happened and Al Sharpton injected himself into it was the Tawana Bawley and Duke Lacrosse players fiasco. I believe the same rhetoric and calls for public execution were used then. How did that turn out?It turned out he was lying. That's why I never pay attention to what he says. You should try that sometime.
Funny how many of the people on this MB that have such little faith in the bureaucratic process all of the sudden have complete faith in law enforcement bureaucracy.
The fact is, very few cases get reviewed with any degree of scrutiny unless outside factors press the issue, and virtually none get reviewed with the same degree of thoroughness that this case is getting reviewed with, now that the state and feds have gotten involved, without outside forces pressing the issue.
It's not speculation
Quote from: Durango 95 on March 24, 2012, 12:48:25 PMQuote from: spartan on March 24, 2012, 12:27:58 PMThe last time something like this happened and Al Sharpton injected himself into it was the Tawana Bawley and Duke Lacrosse players fiasco. I believe the same rhetoric and calls for public execution were used then. How did that turn out?It turned out he was lying. That's why I never pay attention to what he says. You should try that sometime.A lot of people DO listen to him though. That is the problem.