Pewter Report: Your source for inside and breaking news on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Help
Signup
Login
Events Coverage
General News
Training Camp
Game Coverage
Injury Reports
Draft
Senior Bowl
Free Agency
OTAs / Mini-Camps
Charity
Regular Features
Around the Web (RSS Feeds)
SR's Fab Five
PI Quick Hits
Training Camp Diary
Former Bucs
PR Reacts
Chat Transcript
Podcasts
Video
Articles Archive
Testimonials
Bucs Info
Roster
Coaches
Schedule
NFL Standings
Depth Chart
Bucs History
About Pewter Report
Advertise with Pewter Report
Help & Support
Terms and Service
Privacy Policy
Employment at Pewter Report
Fan Central
Message Board
Pick'em
Polls
Become an Insider
Free 30 Day Insider Trial
Experts
Scott Reynolds
Mark Cook
Dory LeBlanc
Victoria Horchak
Eric Dellaratta
Digital Magazine
2013 Buccaneers Draft Preview
Digital Magazine Archive
Reynolds' Column
Cook's Column
Dellaratta's Column
Point – Counterpoint
Draft
PR Reacts
Subscribe
Sign up as a User
Subscribe to the Pewter Insider
Testimonials
Contact
Boards
Login
Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
Username
Password
Forgot your password?
Other issues logging in?
NOT REGISTERED
Register for FREE to get instant access to the following user benefits on PewterReport.com:
Message boards
Chat sessions
Article commenting & ranking
Pick'em contests
Instant messaging
Personal Pewter Report profile
Article notification options
And other exclusive content
No account yet?
x close
Boards
Recent Discussions
Help
Search
RSS
WAP2
Welcome,
Guest
Pewter Report
>>
Boards
>>
The Red Board
(Moderators:
3rd String Kicker
,
PRPatrol
) >> Topic:
the argument against taking a CB at 5
« previous
next »
Page:
1
2
3
...
10
Skull and Bones
Hall of Famer
Posts : 17790
the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
:
March 31, 2012, 10:11:10 AM »
1. 6 out of the top ten passing defenses didn't even make the playoffs.
2. NY Giants (29th), NO Saints (30th), NE Pats (31st), GB Packers (32nd) were at least 4 out of the 5 best teams in the NFL and they were the worst pass defense teams.
Skull and Bones
Hall of Famer
Posts : 17790
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#1 :
March 31, 2012, 10:13:30 AM »
in comparison 6 out of the 10 top run defenses made the playoffs and non of the bottom 9 teams in that category did.
Skull and Bones
Hall of Famer
Posts : 17790
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#2 :
March 31, 2012, 10:14:38 AM »
so how were the Giants, Packers, Pats, and Saints able to be good without good passing defenses? They were all good to mid pack in run defense.
Skull and Bones
Hall of Famer
Posts : 17790
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#3 :
March 31, 2012, 10:21:34 AM »
interestingly, only the Giants countered their bottom level pass defense by being a top 10 sack team. Although 6 out of the top `10 sack teams made the playoffs and only 1 in the bottom 11 did. so it's somewhat important but not essential to be elite. The top 2 teams in this category didn't make the playoffs.
The Franchi5e
Pro Bowler
Posts : 1574
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#4 :
March 31, 2012, 10:21:56 AM »
More like they have offenses that can stay on the field long enough to hide their defensive deficiencies.
Skull and Bones
Hall of Famer
Posts : 17790
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#5 :
March 31, 2012, 10:23:40 AM »
as far as interceptions there are good team in both the top 10 and bottom 10. Don't see a pattern.
Skull and Bones
Hall of Famer
Posts : 17790
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#6 :
March 31, 2012, 10:24:59 AM »
the stats show that run defense is more important to success than pass defense. just the opposite of what many have been saying lately.
The Franchi5e
Pro Bowler
Posts : 1574
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#7 :
March 31, 2012, 10:30:26 AM »
Run defense is by far more important than pass defense. Look at the Jets, great pass defense but once teams found out they could start running on them this year it hurt both areas of their game.
Bschucher
Hall of Famer
Posts : 5345
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#8 :
March 31, 2012, 10:30:34 AM »
What's with your thread format of the post?
Skull and Bones
Hall of Famer
Posts : 17790
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#9 :
March 31, 2012, 10:31:14 AM »
being a good scoring defense though is important. most of the top 10 teams were playoff bound and none of the bottom 7 were.
Tampa-Two
Hall of Famer
Posts : 3264
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#10 :
March 31, 2012, 10:35:11 AM »
Skull and Bones overload...
XFactor
Pro Bowler
Posts : 1381
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#11 :
March 31, 2012, 10:41:54 AM »
Rankings can always be skewed. Those teams you listed for the most part are high scoring teams, it's safe to say that their defense had to face a lot of pass plays opposed to run plays. Kinda like in 2010 when we were ranked 30th in rushing defense and 12 th in pass defense, did we really have the 12th best passing defense because we were that good against the pass or did teams simply run it on us because we sucked at stoping the run.
Skull and Bones
Hall of Famer
Posts : 17790
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#12 :
March 31, 2012, 10:52:54 AM »
Valid point but that just tells you that offenses now dictate how the games are played. Maybe all first round picks should be on that side.
leeroybuc93
Hall of Famer
Posts : 4269
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#13 :
March 31, 2012, 10:54:00 AM »
What I see has nothing to do with defense. I see 3 elite offenses and one very good one.
Dy-nasty D
Starter
Posts : 466
Re: the argument against taking a CB at 5
«
#14 :
March 31, 2012, 11:03:20 AM »
Elite offenses score a lot of points and their opponents have to throw the ball a lot more to play catch up (and often against prevent defenses). This explains the "poor passing defense" of elite offensive teams. And, of course they have better run defenses because teams playing catch up don't run the ball much.
Page:
1
2
3
...
10
Pewter Report
>>
Boards
>>
The Red Board
(Moderators:
3rd String Kicker
,
PRPatrol
) >> Topic:
the argument against taking a CB at 5
« previous
next »
:
:
-----------------------------
J
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
T
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
0
-----------------------------
Powered by SMF 2.0 RC3
|
SMF © 2006–2010, Simple Machines LLC
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Loading...