So, two guys who haven't even played a down in the NFL are listed as part of a NFL list of QBs? Wow, credibility is completely lost.
Sorry, it's takes a lot more than potential to be a NFL QB - much more to be a great one...period.
Well, it's fair to list Luck and RG if you're taking a look ahead, as he listed 32 QBs, and both of these guys will be playing. Now, where you rank them is another thing. Luck is good and all, but will he really finish where predicted when he's playing as a rookie on a team that, well, got the #1 draft pick? On a team that blew up their roster and looks to be rebuilding? I don't think so. But list him, sure.
I have other problems (as do others) with the list, but is making a controversial list just being smart? Would a more standard list draw a ho-hum from readers?