Welcome, Guest
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: You are the GM. The $55.55 million would still go to V. Jackson or M. Wallace? « previous next »
Page: 1 2 3

smithcar

****
Starter

Posts : 337
Offline
#15 : April 20, 2012, 11:07:09 AM

Not sure that either guy is worth that number, but I am reading that Vjax is helping our young guys(future) develop and hopefully become better pros.  Wallace I don't think brings that aspect with him, so I would say Vjax over Wallace even if we didn't have to give up a 1st round pick for Wallace.  We are desperate for leadership, hopefully Vjax can help with that void.

lowlife

*
Starter
****
Posts : 869
Offline
#16 : April 20, 2012, 11:44:48 AM

Nah I'd rather give it to Calvin Johnson. Oh not realistic?

Pointless hypothetical


MUSCLE_HAMSTER

User is on moderator watch listWatched
*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 8200
Offline
#17 : April 20, 2012, 11:47:10 AM

All things equal, you'd take Wallace because he's younger.

But all things weren't and aren't equal.


Tampa-Two

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 3316
Offline
#18 : April 20, 2012, 12:14:23 PM

If we are playing that both were unrestricted free agents I would still roll with Vincent Jackson. He is a proven playmaker in this league. No disrespect to Wallace but VJax is the better player.


MasterC25

*
Starter
****
Posts : 698
Offline
#19 : April 20, 2012, 12:31:25 PM

Damn I know its 4/20 and all but some of yall are to messed uo if you think Mike Wallace is better than VJ. Mike Wallace isn't even the best WR on the Steelers as that honor goes to Antonio Brown even though neither to me are true #1 type recievers more like excellent #2s (ala Mike Williams).

Mike Wallace can only beat you deep. He is not even in the same class as Desean Jax. Big Ben buying time aids in the increase of receptions for both players as you cant cover any one in this league for 5 secs

RiotHeart

****
Starter

Posts : 405
Offline
#20 : April 20, 2012, 12:33:16 PM

Wallace would cost about 5 million more. No thanks.

Rebel

**
Rookie

Posts : 82
Offline
#21 : April 20, 2012, 01:08:40 PM

Wallace is a one trick pony.

Benchwarmer#1

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 13137
Offline
#22 : April 20, 2012, 01:57:47 PM

If I still had the choice, without the pick involved, I'd still rather have VJ on my team.

Naismith was right about Revis. Everyone else is a dummy.

BucBalla85

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 18442
Online
#23 : April 20, 2012, 01:59:38 PM

What about Brady? Can we have him for 55.55 mil?

tatmanfish

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 7634
Offline
#24 : April 20, 2012, 03:00:04 PM

What about Brady? Can we have him for 55.55 mil?

based on the OPs logic for this hypothetical situation, you could have anyone you want.



Quote from: Illuminator
You were simply too smart for me.

BucfanNC12

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 2001
Offline
#25 : April 20, 2012, 04:02:20 PM

I think the OP is presenting a "what if" scenario in which they were both available without having to give up compensation to sign them(i.e. Free Agents)...then who would you rather have...

Well of course in that scenario it would be Wallace because of the many more years of production he could provide.
What's the point of envisioning that scenario?

I dunno, maybe got bored with jackin' it...I couldnt tell ya.

Bored..yes..of jackin it...no. Sometimes I like to post threads of hypothetical scenerios and see what they think. Sort of like mock draft threads, they are all hypothetical discussions.

Dolorous Jason

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 17055
Online
#26 : April 20, 2012, 04:20:52 PM

I'd still take V-jax. V-jax can still go up and make plays with his size , Wallace is a smurf.

What is your point? I was wrong? Ok. You win. I was wrong.

           

Biggs3535

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 31580
Offline
#27 : April 20, 2012, 04:25:57 PM

Bored..yes..of jackin it...no.

Good news, PR is here to help!



chace1986

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 13372
Online
#28 : April 20, 2012, 04:26:47 PM

I think the OP is presenting a "what if" scenario in which they were both available without having to give up compensation to sign them(i.e. Free Agents)...then who would you rather have...

Well of course in that scenario it would be Wallace because of the many more years of production he could provide.
What's the point of envisioning that scenario?

I dunno, maybe got bored with jackin' it...I couldnt tell ya.

Bored..yes..of jackin it...no.

Silly me...I forgot..that could never be deemed as boring...

in fact...............hold that thought...brb.


Until preseason, you stay classy Red Board.

gone

*
Hall of Famer
******
Posts : 9244
Offline
#29 : April 20, 2012, 04:28:49 PM

Wallace is a one-trick pony.  VJax fits us better for what we need.  Downfield threat like Wallace, but also huge redzone target and large catch radius.
Page: 1 2 3
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: You are the GM. The $55.55 million would still go to V. Jackson or M. Wallace? « previous next »
:

Hide Tools Show Tools