You are the GM. The $55.55 million would still go to V. Jackson or M. Wallace?

[smithcar]

Not sure that either guy is worth that number, but I am reading that Vjax is helping our young guys(future) develop and hopefully become better pros.  Wallace I don't think brings that aspect with him, so I would say Vjax over Wallace even if we didn't have to give up a 1st round pick for Wallace.  We are desperate for leadership, hopefully Vjax can help with that void.

[lowlife]

Nah I'd rather give it to Calvin Johnson. Oh not realistic?

Pointless hypothetical

[MUSCLE_HAMSTER]

All things equal, you'd take Wallace because he's younger.

But all things weren't and aren't equal.

[Tampa-Two]

If we are playing that both were unrestricted free agents I would still roll with Vincent Jackson. He is a proven playmaker in this league. No disrespect to Wallace but VJax is the better player.

[MasterC25]

Damn I know its 4/20 and all but some of yall are to messed uo if you think Mike Wallace is better than VJ. Mike Wallace isn't even the best WR on the Steelers as that honor goes to Antonio Brown even though neither to me are true #1 type recievers more like excellent #2s (ala Mike Williams).

Mike Wallace can only beat you deep. He is not even in the same class as Desean Jax. Big Ben buying time aids in the increase of receptions for both players as you cant cover any one in this league for 5 secs

[RiotHeart]

Wallace would cost about 5 million more. No thanks.

[Rebel]

Wallace is a one trick pony.

[Benchwarmer#1]

If I still had the choice, without the pick involved, I'd still rather have VJ on my team.

[BucBalla85]

What about Brady? Can we have him for 55.55 mil?

[tatmanfish]

What about Brady? Can we have him for 55.55 mil?

based on the OPs logic for this hypothetical situation, you could have anyone you want.

[BucfanNC12]

I think the OP is presenting a "what if" scenario in which they were both available without having to give up compensation to sign them(i.e. Free Agents)...then who would you rather have...

Well of course in that scenario it would be Wallace because of the many more years of production he could provide.

What's the point of envisioning that scenario?

I dunno, maybe got bored with jackin' it...I couldnt tell ya.

Bored..yes..of jackin it...no. Sometimes I like to post threads of hypothetical scenerios and see what they think. Sort of like mock draft threads, they are all hypothetical discussions.

[Dolorous Jason]

I'd still take V-jax. V-jax can still go up and make plays with his size , Wallace is a smurf.

[Biggs3535]

Bored..yes..of jackin it...no.

Good news, PR is here to help!

[chace1986]

I think the OP is presenting a "what if" scenario in which they were both available without having to give up compensation to sign them(i.e. Free Agents)...then who would you rather have...

Well of course in that scenario it would be Wallace because of the many more years of production he could provide.

What's the point of envisioning that scenario?

I dunno, maybe got bored with jackin' it...I couldnt tell ya.

Bored..yes..of jackin it...no.

Silly me...I forgot..that could never be deemed as boring...

in fact...............hold that thought...brb.

[caradoc]

Wallace is a one-trick pony.  VJax fits us better for what we need.  Downfield threat like Wallace, but also huge redzone target and large catch radius.