My impression of Bernard Pollard is he's a pretty one dimensional in the box safety. If Barron is who they think he is, he should be much much better in coverage.
He's not bad in the shallow zones but he's too stiff and tightly wound to be any good in M2M or running down the field
People seem to think Barron will be one of the better SS's in coverage.
They're wrong...
And you're mad.
Let us wait and see how he stacks up in games, then maybe some here will be feasting on crow. But, I imagine some complain just for the sake of complaining. It is their right.