Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: dalbuc on April 30, 2012, 08:08:39 PMOf course, if Barron is a run stuffer you flank the TE out. You get him matched on an RB. You use formations to keep him away from the line or to suck him up to the line. Safeties are about the easiest thing to manipulate on the field.TE's are a huge part of todays NFL...how does him covering a TE take him out of the play? if he's matched up on a RB he is still right in the middle of the action. every position can be manipulated, but a safety will always be more in the action than a cover corner imo.
Of course, if Barron is a run stuffer you flank the TE out. You get him matched on an RB. You use formations to keep him away from the line or to suck him up to the line. Safeties are about the easiest thing to manipulate on the field.
One thing is for certain: QBs always look to see where a safety like Barron is lined up. And they adjust accordingly (on pass plays, and even on run downs). They can look them off easily, the good QBs do anyway...Barron may be easily manipulated, but what he does manipulates the QBs decision making quickly as well.
Quote from: Boid Fink on April 30, 2012, 10:26:57 PMOne thing is for certain: QBs always look to see where a safety like Barron is lined up. And they adjust accordingly (on pass plays, and even on run downs). They can look them off easily, the good QBs do anyway...Barron may be easily manipulated, but what he does manipulates the QBs decision making quickly as well.QB's always look to see where S's are lined up period. They are typically the key for an QB to start with. It doesn't matter who they are. It isn't like Freeman is sitting about going, Giosh, I don't even know the names of the CAR safeties so I guess I don't care where they lined up." People try and make this so dramatic.
No, because a TE and rB are much lower value players to be covering. essentially we have our pick #7 covering some other teams pick 144 and 214 for example.
He's a hater.
No, because a TE and rB are much lower value players to be covering. essentially we have our pick #7 covering some other teams pick 144 and 214 for example. Plus, as an in the box guy he can be moved out of the box where his value drops dramatically. Again, if the S is sooooooo flippin' central to every defense like you and the others are claiming why one god's green earth do they get paid so little? Oh right...you are wrong.
No, because a TE and rB are much lower value players to be covering.
I wish someone would get that memo to the Saints who toast us every game with Sproles and Jimmy Graham...Teams play a lot of zone also , so it's not like all they do is cover TE's. You need a safety who's able to pick up those star recievers once they get deep, and not get easily looked off by a QB.( and once again , this is not even factoring in how much more important safeties are against the run ) We probably couldn't have won that superbowl without an ALL-pro safety like John Lynch ( and Dexter Jackson was MVP, BTW, another safety ) , but let's face it , our coverage corners were below average in man coverage . Dwight SMith and Brian Kelly bombed when they left Tampa. They were all zone system corners all drafted in the middle rounds. Guess what ? It didn't matter .Give me the superstar safety anyday who can help in all facets of the defense and all over the field.
You clearly don't need great CB's in a cover 2 scheme but the safeties are non-issues as well. Lynch was an in box cover in front of him guy. I think Barron is Lynch. I also think people here overrated what he was because Lynch was not a coverage guy. The rest of our S's also flamed out anywhere they went.. In the end the CB allows much more flexibility because if you get an eraser then you have that part of the field eliminated and you can roll coverage to your lesser guys or play more guys up because you don't always need a S behind the CB.