Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Here he is now without his shirt. He looks quite different.
Java that was funny. Have to give you one for that.
Quote from: JavaRay on May 15, 2012, 08:23:48 AMHere he is now without his shirt. He looks quite different.Shocking . . . .. Java, you need help
Ya, google is pretty scary stuff. You retard.Go to images.google.comsearch on "shirtless skinny guy" He is the first image.
You retard.
Quote from: tatmanfish on May 14, 2012, 11:22:54 PMno one said he was. to pretend that play calling wasnt a huge problem is retarded though. Olson didnt try to make Freeman more Brees like? Or Freeman just decided he didnt want to run anymore. Pretty easy to determine which had a large effect....that is with logic. Players dont just change a huge successful part of their game out of the blue on their own. If you dont think Blount was misused at all, well Ive lost all respect for any opinion you could have on football. The guy had a bunch of games where he had less than 5 carries in the first half. A back like that and you only get him the ball 5 times? Yeah, Im sure he refused to block or catch. Sounds likely. There may be some gray, but youre trying to blur it so far you cant see any of the black or white. Only problem is, is that anyone with a a memory or dvdr can go back and point out all the black and white youre trying to hide.im not pretending the playcalling was great, im just not hopping on with the idea that it was all on olson. i dont know how playcalling even correlates to freeman tucking and running. and the fact that having freeman meet brees is a bad thing? c'mon. its pretty easy to assume we know what happened last year...doesnt make it true. sorry, but logic doesnt apply here imo.as for blount, and as long as we are assuming, im gonna assume he didnt bust his tail in practice. he didnt prove he could be trusted with routes, audibles, and blitz protections. im gonna assume he came late to meetings and didnt pay attention when he did show up. then im gonna assume thats why he didnt get more carries and trust from the staff. thats why he didnt get more passing play downs. im also gonna assume we didnt run the ball very well consistently, and we didnt run it great early in games. im gonna assume we had a porous defense and got behind early in games. because, yes, i do think he can catch a screen pass. i think as a 250lb RB he has the ability to block.as for me trying to hide black and white...until someone comes up with a dvr'd game where it catches freeman asking to run and olson saying "no, stay in the pocket and throw the 2 yard dumpoff to lumpkin" then no, im sticking with my gray theory. until PR comes out with a story that freeman was told not to leave the pocket...gray. now im sure it was stressed that he is the franchise, and we dont want him injured...but we won a lot of games in 2010 with plenty of help from freemans runs...i think it was a joint effort to keep him in the pocket.
no one said he was. to pretend that play calling wasnt a huge problem is retarded though. Olson didnt try to make Freeman more Brees like? Or Freeman just decided he didnt want to run anymore. Pretty easy to determine which had a large effect....that is with logic. Players dont just change a huge successful part of their game out of the blue on their own. If you dont think Blount was misused at all, well Ive lost all respect for any opinion you could have on football. The guy had a bunch of games where he had less than 5 carries in the first half. A back like that and you only get him the ball 5 times? Yeah, Im sure he refused to block or catch. Sounds likely. There may be some gray, but youre trying to blur it so far you cant see any of the black or white. Only problem is, is that anyone with a a memory or dvdr can go back and point out all the black and white youre trying to hide.
You were simply too smart for me.
You probably don't know this, but that pic is now stored on your hard drive simply by you viewing it.
Quote from: VinBucFan on May 15, 2012, 11:18:29 AMQuote from: JavaRay on May 15, 2012, 08:23:48 AMHere he is now without his shirt. He looks quite different.Shocking . . . .. Java, you need helpSounds like you are volunteering to help. Sorry, I'm not into boys, he's all yours. that is, if he's also gay and over 18 and interested in you.
Quote from: JavaRay on May 15, 2012, 11:07:13 AMYou retard.Unwarranted personal attack.
In all seriousness, why would you even post a picture of a shirtless boy of a questionable age?
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.