Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
He had two fumbles in the Titans game and two in the Jaguars game. Late in the year and the entire team, offense and defense was absolutely dreadful. We were in complete self destruction mode and every single player looked like crap. The entire team had clearly given up on their coach. They weren't even trying...but people like to pick and choose what stats to pull from that embarrassingly bad 10 game losing streak. Somehow it's fair to judge Blount on those 4 fumbles but not judge the rest of the team for their awful performance. Freeman was throwing garbage, the receivers weren't getting open, the line wasn't blocking for **CENSORED**, we couldn't tackle anyone, couldn't cover anyone, and couldn't get to the QB.....but it's Blount's 4 fumbles that stick out? I don't get that. If we are going to judge the players off of the last ten games of 2011...we need a whole new team. And despite his four fumbles in those last ten games, he was probably our best player during that time. He was still trying hard and single handedly changed the momentum in the Greenbay game. Was just looking and noticed for the first time that Blount had 46 carries in the last 5 games. Less than ten carries per game. SMH. I know we were getting curb stomped and down by double digits, but damn.
Any who are claiming those are all attributed to Greg Olsen and not Blount himself are kidding themselves.
You were simply too smart for me.
you need serious reading comprehension skills.
Quote from: tatmanfish on May 15, 2012, 08:26:15 PM you need serious reading comprehension skills.This is ironic considering it's tatman posting it.
Says the guy who sees something sexual in a picture of a shirtless nerd...How does it feel to be out of the closet?
The bad attitude is nonsense. Charlie Campbell wrote an article on Walter's football that Blount and Mike Williams were lazy last year. It was from an unnamed source.... but ever since, people claim Blount is lazy and doesn't try hard enough. Truth is, any story you pull up by a named source says that Blount is a very polite, and well mannered young man. Anything else is just hear-say. As far as him being good. He is obviously amazing at running the ball. He is not a complete back. He needs to improve his pass blocking and route running, but when it comes to just straight up running the ball he is outstanding.....and yet some Buc fans can't admit that and would have us trade or cut him.
Heaven forbid that you point out his flaws....that automatically constitutes "hating"....what an awesome way of deflecting and steering the topic.
Quote from: BucDaFackUp on May 15, 2012, 11:00:53 PMHeaven forbid that you point out his flaws....that automatically constitutes "hating"....what an awesome way of deflecting and steering the topic.yep, because thats the definition of a "hater."1. hater- A person that simply cannot be happy for another person's success. So rather than be happy they make a point of exposing a flaw in that person.funny you used the exact words in the definition. Whats funnier is you assume to know whether Blount can block or catch when none of us have seen if he can in the NFL. Olson didnt put him in a position where we could actually have a valid amount of evidence to base an opinion off of. If you want to take Olsons word as gospel, thats fine. Just dont expect a good response because the entire NFL knows he cant coordinate or use his players for crap.