Welcome, Guest
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Eagles looking to trade D-Lineman Darryl Tapp « previous next »
Page: 1 2 3 4

BucsWin31

****
Starter

Posts : 890
Offline
#15 : August 29, 2012, 10:48:20 PM

Best year was 2007 with 7 sacks.  Only 27.  Could be a decent rotational guy.
he been productive everywhere he's been. Definitely could use him for the Carolina game.

BucBalla85

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 18522
Online
#16 : August 29, 2012, 10:49:12 PM

Yes... Do it Dom! Dline needs this guy.

wreck ship

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 2163
Offline
#17 : August 29, 2012, 11:13:07 PM

6'1 270 ?? Dude is a smurf for a Dlineman . No thanks. Our run D is suspect enough already.
My thoughts exactly.
If we do add a dlinemen before next weekend he better be 310+ and a premium run stuffer

philosophy is questions that may never be answered
religion is answers that may never be questioned

The Anti-Java

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 23556
Offline
#18 : August 29, 2012, 11:20:20 PM

6'1 270 ?? Dude is a smurf for a Dlineman . No thanks. Our run D is suspect enough already.
My thoughts exactly.
If we do add a dlinemen before next weekend he better be 310+ and a premium run stuffer




Bennett only goes 274......and Clayborn 280.........George Johnson 265



Boid Fink

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 54708
Offline
#19 : August 29, 2012, 11:21:07 PM

After watching the BUcs D-line get abused like Choir Boys, I would strongly urge something be done to improve the quality of the backups.


Boid Fink

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 54708
Offline
#20 : August 29, 2012, 11:21:54 PM

Smurf defenders can sometimes make for a splash play or two. 

Ask Elvis "I get stomped on by Marcus Vick" Dumervil.


BucsWin31

****
Starter

Posts : 890
Offline
#21 : August 29, 2012, 11:21:59 PM

6'1 270 ?? Dude is a smurf for a Dlineman . No thanks. Our run D is suspect enough already.
My thoughts exactly.
If we do add a dlinemen before next weekend he better be 310+ and a premium run stuffer




Bennett only goes 274......and Clayborn 280.........George Johnson 265
Boom! And the tape don't lie, he gets to the quarterback...we need as many ppl like that as possible.

wreck ship

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 2163
Offline
#22 : August 29, 2012, 11:34:53 PM

6'1 270 ?? Dude is a smurf for a Dlineman . No thanks. Our run D is suspect enough already.
My thoughts exactly.
If we do add a dlinemen before next weekend he better be 310+ and a premium run stuffer




Bennett only goes 274......and Clayborn 280.........George Johnson 265
those are DE's not DT's.
Want to see what size can get you at DT? Look no further than the Patriots Wilfork and look at Doug Martins rushing numbers for that game.
We need a spac eater who can hold the point of attack against the center and gaurd. Tapp is relentless in the pass rush but sucks against the run.

philosophy is questions that may never be answered
religion is answers that may never be questioned

Benchwarmer#1

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 13411
Online
#23 : August 29, 2012, 11:36:42 PM

6'1 270 ?? Dude is a smurf for a Dlineman . No thanks. Our run D is suspect enough already.
My thoughts exactly.
If we do add a dlinemen before next weekend he better be 310+ and a premium run stuffer




Bennett only goes 274......and Clayborn 280.........George Johnson 265
Boom! And the tape don't lie, he gets to the quarterback...we need as many ppl like that as possible.

I never understood the concepts that were put on DLs.

So you HAVE to be big? Yet you want to go low to the ground for better leverage? Why not just have DLs that are all around 6ft?

Naismith was right about Revis. Everyone else is a dummy.

Bucs N Beers

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 3847
Offline
#24 : August 29, 2012, 11:43:32 PM

6'1 270 ?? Dude is a smurf for a Dlineman . No thanks. Our run D is suspect enough already.
My thoughts exactly.
If we do add a dlinemen before next weekend he better be 310+ and a premium run stuffer




Bennett only goes 274......and Clayborn 280.........George Johnson 265
those are DE's not DT's.
Want to see what size can get you at DT? Look no further than the Patriots Wilfork and look at Doug Martins rushing numbers for that game.
We need a spac eater who can hold the point of attack against the center and gaurd. Tapp is relentless in the pass rush but sucks against the run.

I think he is listing DE's because, well, Tapp is a DE. Crazy.


HOOOOOOOO!!!!

The Anti-Java

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 23556
Offline
#25 : August 29, 2012, 11:45:08 PM

6'1 270 ?? Dude is a smurf for a Dlineman . No thanks. Our run D is suspect enough already.
My thoughts exactly.
If we do add a dlinemen before next weekend he better be 310+ and a premium run stuffer




Bennett only goes 274......and Clayborn 280.........George Johnson 265
those are DE's not DT's.
Want to see what size can get you at DT? Look no further than the Patriots Wilfork and look at Doug Martins rushing numbers for that game.
We need a spac eater who can hold the point of attack against the center and gaurd. Tapp is relentless in the pass rush but sucks against the run.





This Tapp dude IS a DE.



wreck ship

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 2163
Offline
#26 : August 29, 2012, 11:55:57 PM

6'1 270 ?? Dude is a smurf for a Dlineman . No thanks. Our run D is suspect enough already.
My thoughts exactly.
If we do add a dlinemen before next weekend he better be 310+ and a premium run stuffer




Bennett only goes 274......and Clayborn 280.........George Johnson 265
those are DE's not DT's.
Want to see what size can get you at DT? Look no further than the Patriots Wilfork and look at Doug Martins rushing numbers for that game.
We need a spac eater who can hold the point of attack against the center and gaurd. Tapp is relentless in the pass rush but sucks against the run.





This Tapp dude IS a DE.
I'm aware.
Note that I posted, "If we add a dlinemen he should be a 310+ run stuffer." That was followed by Anit Java posting the sizes of DE's.?
My point is we need a run stuffer more than a pass rusher in the final 53. 

philosophy is questions that may never be answered
religion is answers that may never be questioned

The Anti-Java

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 23556
Offline
#27 : August 30, 2012, 12:02:51 AM

6'1 270 ?? Dude is a smurf for a Dlineman . No thanks. Our run D is suspect enough already.
My thoughts exactly.
If we do add a dlinemen before next weekend he better be 310+ and a premium run stuffer




Bennett only goes 274......and Clayborn 280.........George Johnson 265
those are DE's not DT's.
Want to see what size can get you at DT? Look no further than the Patriots Wilfork and look at Doug Martins rushing numbers for that game.
We need a spac eater who can hold the point of attack against the center and gaurd. Tapp is relentless in the pass rush but sucks against the run.





This Tapp dude IS a DE.
I'm aware.
Note that I posted, "If we add a dlinemen he should be a 310+ run stuffer." That was followed by Anit Java posting the sizes of DE's.?
My point is we need a run stuffer more than a pass rusher in the final 53.




I hear ya man, and agree.   I was thinking this Tapp dude was more of a Bowers fill-in.



The Anti-Java

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 23556
Offline
#28 : August 30, 2012, 01:41:54 AM

Still young too.  It will be interesting to see Dom's plan this weekend.  He said tonight he may even go under 53, then fill with new guys.



Benchwarmer#1

******
Hall of Famer

Posts : 13411
Online
#29 : August 30, 2012, 03:09:10 AM

Still young too.  It will be interesting to see Dom's plan this weekend.  He said tonight he may even go under 53, then fill with new guys.

If he does, it says a lot about how bad the second stringers are.

Naismith was right about Revis. Everyone else is a dummy.
Page: 1 2 3 4
Pewter Report  >>  Boards  >>  The Red Board (Moderators: 3rd String Kicker, PRPatrol)  >>  Topic: Eagles looking to trade D-Lineman Darryl Tapp « previous next »
:

Hide Tools Show Tools