Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
I like that they stuck with the run but the second half was hard to watch at times. Sullivan needs to open it up and let Freeman take some shots down-field. We're not paying Jackson $11M per to block for RB's.
i was gonna do a long response but figured it was pointless...because i dont know the plan. cant defend something i have no idea on.
Quote from: bucfan26 on September 09, 2012, 08:13:38 PMI like that they stuck with the run but the second half was hard to watch at times. Sullivan needs to open it up and let Freeman take some shots down-field. We're not paying Jackson $11M per to block for RB's.I disagree. Freeman is no Brett Favre. If he can manage the game like Dilfer and not screw up, we have a good chance this year. Freeman obeyed rule #1.Rule #1= Just don't screw it up.
Quote from: GrimmReaper on September 09, 2012, 09:13:36 PMQuote from: bucfan26 on September 09, 2012, 08:13:38 PMI like that they stuck with the run but the second half was hard to watch at times. Sullivan needs to open it up and let Freeman take some shots down-field. We're not paying Jackson $11M per to block for RB's.I disagree. Freeman is no Brett Favre. If he can manage the game like Dilfer and not screw up, we have a good chance this year. Freeman obeyed rule #1.Rule #1= Just don't screw it up.Maybe that's the best thing for this team, but it's a fair question why spend $55 million for Vincent Jackson if you're not going to stretch the field. If you want to be a ground and pound team, spend that $55 million on ground and pound players.
Quote from: Feel Real Good on September 10, 2012, 08:14:36 AMQuote from: GrimmReaper on September 09, 2012, 09:13:36 PMQuote from: bucfan26 on September 09, 2012, 08:13:38 PMI like that they stuck with the run but the second half was hard to watch at times. Sullivan needs to open it up and let Freeman take some shots down-field. We're not paying Jackson $11M per to block for RB's.I disagree. Freeman is no Brett Favre. If he can manage the game like Dilfer and not screw up, we have a good chance this year. Freeman obeyed rule #1.Rule #1= Just don't screw it up.Maybe that's the best thing for this team, but it's a fair question why spend $55 million for Vincent Jackson if you're not going to stretch the field. If you want to be a ground and pound team, spend that $55 million on ground and pound players.Because in order to ground and pound the defense has to be scared that there is someone who can take the top off the defense . Otherwise you get both safeties in the box and you're dead in the water.
Quote from: Dolorous Jason on September 10, 2012, 08:18:21 AMQuote from: Feel Real Good on September 10, 2012, 08:14:36 AMQuote from: GrimmReaper on September 09, 2012, 09:13:36 PMQuote from: bucfan26 on September 09, 2012, 08:13:38 PMI like that they stuck with the run but the second half was hard to watch at times. Sullivan needs to open it up and let Freeman take some shots down-field. We're not paying Jackson $11M per to block for RB's.I disagree. Freeman is no Brett Favre. If he can manage the game like Dilfer and not screw up, we have a good chance this year. Freeman obeyed rule #1.Rule #1= Just don't screw it up.Maybe that's the best thing for this team, but it's a fair question why spend $55 million for Vincent Jackson if you're not going to stretch the field. If you want to be a ground and pound team, spend that $55 million on ground and pound players.Because in order to ground and pound the defense has to be scared that there is someone who can take the top off the defense . Otherwise you get both safeties in the box and you're dead in the water.So you have to spend $55 million in order to have your rushing offense avergae 3.6 YPC?