Packers Robbed.... Enough is enough

[ufojoe]

I really wanted the Seahawks to win but that was clearly offensive PI and an INT.

[Hate]

[Sam Ram 33]

I hate the packers.... But if you think it was a "tie" you are either legally blind or you don't know a thing about the game of football... You have to be really ignorant to think that.

[Spoolios]

Terrible call on the field, but the replay was correct in not overturning.

[Garv]

That was not right.....period. It was a bad call, it makes the NFL look like pro wrestling and it cannot go on.



Carry on.

[chace1986]

Terrible call on the field, but the replay was correct in not overturning.

...........you usually aren't an idiot...so explain...

[jhop88]

I hate the packers.... But if you think it was a "tie" you are either legally blind or you don't know a thing about the game of football... You have to be really ignorant to think that.

Or you're obviously a 12-yr old troll like someone posting in this thread. (not you)

[Spoolios]

You can't overturn it without indisputable evidence. Being able to say, "Of course it was a terrible call and it was obviously an interception," isn't enough. You have to clearly see them both hit the turf without Tate having the ball. You couldn't do it. Once they made the terrible call on the field, the replay couldn't overturn it.

[Hate]

Terrible call on the field, but the replay was correct in not overturning.

How in the hell? The replay clearly shows who had possession of the ball.

[Sam Ram 33]

I decided to tweet Vincent Jackson after this and told him it would be nice if the bucs offense could atleast give the refs a chance to give them points.... he didn't respond

[-ts]

Terrible call on the field, but the replay was correct in not overturning.

...........you usually aren't an idiot...so explain...

I with Spoolios. Technically simultaneous possession is a judgement call which can't be reviewed. So with that said whether it was right or wrong it isn't reviewable.


And if it was, it wasn't a replacement ref that screwed that up because NFL officials are still doing the replays.

[chace1986]

You can't overturn it without indisputable evidence. Being able to say, "Of course it was a terrible call and it was obviously an interception," isn't enough. You have to clearly see them both hit the turf without Tate having the ball. You couldn't do it. Once they made the terrible call on the field, the replay couldn't overturn it.

dude. glasses. contact lenses. seriously. there should be no doubt about that one.

[McCoy93]

are the regular refs having a party right now?

[Sam Ram 33]

you could clearly tell jennings had the ball and tate raped his hand around his body to make it look like he caught it... then they clear the pile and tate has 1 arm on the ball.... So yes you could over turn it..... Even though one ref signaled touchdown (was farther away) and one signaled INT... they didn't even talk about... You saw all the time so far they dont even make a call on the field and look at the replay then say what the call was on the field

[Hate]

Simultaneous possession? Damn!!