Seems there is a news topic or so missing - here's one

[CBWx2]

Is the article incorrect, CBW? 

Which part? The part about Facebook isn't. The part about Obama denying the Navy Seals aid is.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-did-not-deny-requests-help-benghazi-aide-182415488--election.html

And this is final fact because they said so?  Why have congressional investigations at all.  This has turned into the mess most saw coming from day 1.

Is the Breitbart article final fact? Point is, the investigation is ongoing. If the mainstream media doesn't have a definitive explanation of events, Breitbart sure as hell doesn't either. You asked if the article was correct. It is not. It is right wing propaganda, despite how much you and Vince want to act as though it's "real" news. There is zero evidence confirming that the president denied aid to Navy Seals in Libya.

so says the guy who claimed Zimmerman had no head injury and used a racial epithet ....

nice use of the word confirming . . . typical CBW bull spit

Difference being, both of those stories were reported by mainstream media sources, not right-wing or left-wing propaganda rags. You know, the ones that you are so adamantly opposed to others posting, yet contiguously post yourself?

BTW, if you want to call me out for not waiting for confirmation on the Zimmerman thing, it sort of highlights the fact that you have the president tried and convicted already on less evidence than there was on Zimmerman. See how that can cut both ways, smart one?

[VinBucFan]

Is the article incorrect, CBW? 

Which part? The part about Facebook isn't. The part about Obama denying the Navy Seals aid is.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-did-not-deny-requests-help-benghazi-aide-182415488--election.html

And this is final fact because they said so?  Why have congressional investigations at all.  This has turned into the mess most saw coming from day 1.

Is the Breitbart article final fact? Point is, the investigation is ongoing. If the mainstream media doesn't have a definitive explanation of events, Breitbart sure as hell doesn't either. You asked if the article was correct. It is not. It is right wing propaganda, despite how much you and Vince want to act as though it's "real" news. There is zero evidence confirming that the president denied aid to Navy Seals in Libya.

so says the guy who claimed Zimmerman had no head injury and used a racial epithet ....

nice use of the word confirming . . . typical CBW bull spit

Difference being, both of those stories were reported by mainstream media sources, not right-wing or left-wing propaganda rags. You know, the ones that you are so adamantly opposed to others posting, yet contiguously post yourself?

BTW, if you want to call me out for not waiting for confirmation on the Zimmerman thing, it sort of highlights the fact that you have the president tried and convicted already on less evidence than there was on Zimmerman. See how that can cut both ways, smart one?

keep spinning black hole. 

You used your own brain to reach the conclusion that Zimmerman had no head injury (posting photos to "prove" your case) and your own brain to reach the conclusion that Zimmerman used a racial epithet (and call out others who did not agree) .. .   you've used that same brain to come up with your "confirmation" bull spit.   

spin . . spin . . . little back hole

[Bayfisher]

Most people know that we’ve been lied to about the attacks in Benghazi, but few realize the extent of those lies or the hidden secrets they cover. After all, the lie is different at every level. Thanks to a well placed source with extensive knowledge about the attack, the disturbing truth is slowly beginning to emerge and is lining up with information contained in my previous articles published here weeks ago (Here, Here and Here). The truth reveals the most serious situation in the world today as it involves the interests and destinies of us all.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/50586

This is a new twist.  Leave it to Canada to do the work this time.  I wonder if there is another UN position open to make this all go away.

[Biggs3535]

Is the CanadaFreePress site "right-wing" or not?  I need to know if this report is viable before reading.

[Bayfisher]

Lmao!  I'm going to guess they are tea party extremists.

[VinBucFan]

"right wing" website calls out the President and his men for attempting to run out the clock:

http://abcnews.go.com/m/blogEntry?id=17620829

Drip, drip, drip ..., damn conservative blogger :-)

[CBWx2]

So absolutely nothing on this from the cons since the Patreus bombshell dropped. Interesting...

[Bayfisher]

So absolutely nothing on this from the cons since the Patreus bombshell dropped. Interesting...

I think it is more likely you are two months late to the party. 

[VinBucFan]

So absolutely nothing on this from the cons since the Patreus bombshell dropped. Interesting...

a liar and a lonely guy . .  . yeesh

[CBWx2]

Not sexy enough for the cons if they can't squarely blame Obama for it I suppose. Oh well...

[Bayfisher]

Not sexy enough for the cons if they can't squarely blame Obama for it I suppose. Oh well...

Where were you when I posted about the other General and the Admiral?  Exactly. Don't act like you have a clue about any of this. You know what 0 tells you.

[Biggs3535]

So absolutely nothing on this from the cons since the Patreus bombshell dropped. Interesting...

What does Patreus' infidelity have to do with the White House's fumbling of Benghazi?

[olafberserker]

nothing (at least not directly), just starts another endless circle

[dbucfan]

Yet another tent housing a circus

[Skull and Bones]

For those keeping track, that's 3 Generals (Ham, Allen, Ward), 1 Admiral (Gaouette), and 1 CIA Director in the past 30 days.. Nothing to see here folks.