He said starters not pro bowlers
BUT what did he MENT? or what did i?
A 'pro bowler' is player that plays at the pro bowl, something to accomplish by getting voted there. So we can talk about how this tells nothing about the players actual skill, and his ability to 'start' on almost any team.
But my understanding of 'to start on almost any team' is a 'pro bowler'. If you think this is wrong, i do not have any issues to use other words for what i'm trying to state: There is alot of talent on thihs team, while other teams, constintent winners (no clue why i put the giants on this list, lol), have just a many 'players to start on most teams' as we do beside all those (below ) average no namers.
Don't you think the ravens would have killed for a C Barth last year... you know, to get to the super bowl? Would the giants or pats have missed the SB, if they would have some of our RBs, OLs, or DBs?
Maybe Penn is over rated, not a top 5 LT, still a lot of team would like to have atleast a guy like him to protect their average QBs. Almost every fan in the NFL thinks his team has the worst OL, glorifying the other teams OLers, thinking just their team is plaged by rag dolls.
As said make a list for other teams, 'pro bowler' or 'players that would start on most teams' and see how much they are plagged by average players aswell.
How easy is it really to upgrade at LT, RDE or CB? how many are really better, for what prize and how many wins would this bring? Where is this raiders CB now? Too busy counting his rings?
Yeah A Rodger is elite, because K2 draw a flag for Off PI? Else how does his record look like? ...like romo's?
The almighty giants were 9-7 last year, right? Remember the Cruz fumble vs ARZ? Where would coughlin be now? did they just went hot in the playoffs or do they underachieve year and year out? Yeah,we are 20+ elite players away from what the giants do, atleast...