Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: taqibalib on October 07, 2012, 03:03:47 PMIt's not too early to complain about Martin. RBs require the least amount of time to develop. RBs drafted in the first round should at least average a 4.0 ypc regardless of the oline or system.So are you saying that Trent Richardson is also a bust because he is only averaging 3.5 ypc?
It's not too early to complain about Martin. RBs require the least amount of time to develop. RBs drafted in the first round should at least average a 4.0 ypc regardless of the oline or system.
Quote from: CyberDilemma on October 07, 2012, 06:33:02 PMQuote from: taqibalib on October 07, 2012, 03:03:47 PMIt's not too early to complain about Martin. RBs require the least amount of time to develop. RBs drafted in the first round should at least average a 4.0 ypc regardless of the oline or system.So are you saying that Trent Richardson is also a bust because he is only averaging 3.5 ypc?yesI mean he does have slightly better production, but he was taken top 5When you think about it, he's a bigger bust.
Quote from: taqibalib on October 07, 2012, 06:43:31 PMQuote from: CyberDilemma on October 07, 2012, 06:33:02 PMQuote from: taqibalib on October 07, 2012, 03:03:47 PMIt's not too early to complain about Martin. RBs require the least amount of time to develop. RBs drafted in the first round should at least average a 4.0 ypc regardless of the oline or system.So are you saying that Trent Richardson is also a bust because he is only averaging 3.5 ypc?yesI mean he does have slightly better production, but he was taken top 5When you think about it, he's a bigger bust.I'm sure last week you were saying the Colts should have taken RG3 instead of Luck too.
Quote from: BucfanNC12 on October 07, 2012, 02:31:52 PMQuote from: taqibalib on October 07, 2012, 01:51:26 PMAssume that we pick up Alfred Morris in the 6th, who would you have picked instead of Doug Martin?What's wrong with that opinion? Alfred Morris has outplayed Doug Martin and he was drafted 5 rounds lower. It's just a fun thread to see who people would have picked instead.
Quote from: taqibalib on October 07, 2012, 01:51:26 PMAssume that we pick up Alfred Morris in the 6th, who would you have picked instead of Doug Martin?
Assume that we pick up Alfred Morris in the 6th, who would you have picked instead of Doug Martin?
Quote from: Hate on October 07, 2012, 03:58:37 PMQuote from: taqibalib on October 07, 2012, 03:40:18 PMMartin isn't even small. He's a pretty huge guy. Being 5'8" to 5'10" is ideal for a RB when they have that much muscle.Agreed... but he goes down like he's Dexter McClusterHe sure does and that is why Martin should have backed up Blount.
Quote from: taqibalib on October 07, 2012, 03:40:18 PMMartin isn't even small. He's a pretty huge guy. Being 5'8" to 5'10" is ideal for a RB when they have that much muscle.Agreed... but he goes down like he's Dexter McCluster
Martin isn't even small. He's a pretty huge guy. Being 5'8" to 5'10" is ideal for a RB when they have that much muscle.
Man, I just don't see the easy to go down criticism at all. I see a guy that isn't getting great blocking and might not be hitting the correct holes, but he doesn't look like he goes down easily at all.
In hindsight, who should we have chosen with the Doug Martin pick?
Quote from: Spoolios on October 07, 2012, 06:06:04 PMMan, I just don't see the easy to go down criticism at all. I see a guy that isn't getting great blocking and might not be hitting the correct holes, but he doesn't look like he goes down easily at all.Well the rest of us have been watching Blount create big plays with an even worse line the past 2 years. Schiano crowned this guy before he earned anything. Pointy blank period.