Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
Quote from: chace1986 on November 13, 2012, 02:43:39 PMYou two should just f*ck and get it over with...Ha, that Java's style not mine that's for sure. Even Java is out of luck though because Biggs is famous (or infamous) for being too scared to show up and square up on a bet. He's just a hot air balloon, all talk Internet bully -- Java's probably excited nonetheless.
You two should just f*ck and get it over with...
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
Quote from: VinBucFan on November 13, 2012, 03:00:13 PMQuote from: chace1986 on November 13, 2012, 02:43:39 PMYou two should just f*ck and get it over with...Ha, that Java's style not mine that's for sure. Even Java is out of luck though because Biggs is famous (or infamous) for being too scared to show up and square up on a bet. He's just a hot air balloon, all talk Internet bully -- Java's probably excited nonetheless.Wasn't Freddy the bet welcher?
Quote from: Biggs3535 on November 13, 2012, 03:17:50 PMQuote from: VinBucFan on November 13, 2012, 02:34:31 PMQuote from: Biggs3535 on November 13, 2012, 08:51:25 AMQuote from: chace1986 on November 12, 2012, 04:15:15 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on November 12, 2012, 04:09:42 PMQuote from: Biggs3535 on November 12, 2012, 03:44:05 PMWhy do certain people cling to the false premise that the Buccaneers could have only drafted Doug Martin and Lavonte David if they didn't pick Claiborne? There were plenty of ways to get Claiborne, Martin, and David....and what ways would those have been without the 4th round pick we acquired by trading back , dingleberry ?We would have had the '12 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th picks to work with, as well as the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th for '13 to work with. Any combination of those picks could have helped us to jump back into the 1st, and back into the 2nd.Evidently you have to spell things out for the simpletons among us.IRONY DRIPPING ^^^^^^^^ Gotta love when you are appropriately savaged for making a silly comment and then you go back through all the savagery and pick out one quote that you presume supports your earlier statement and quote it and call everyone else simpletons !!!!!!!!. . . all WITHOUT ACKNOWLEDGING THE OBVIOUS FLAW in the argument quoted (even though it was discussed ad nauseum). . . . . . . lol . . . that sheet is better than a tv comedyEven if youre compelled to make the wrong argument, why compund the problem by calling everyone else SIMPLETONS? How about just make your argument and leave it at that? Because you do crap like that all the time, it makes your gaffes all that more hillarious . . .manQuit posting, for chrissakes. None of your crap even makes sense any longer, PeanutButterCheeseBoy.I have no doubt you have trouble comprehending . . that's the point. True to form, when the conversation goes beyond you your response is to pull out some crazy name, abandoning the demonstrably stupid point you were making before . . which is what makes it hillarious that you called everyone else simpletons.I wonder if you even understand the flaw in your original comment about a "false premise" Its all there to read, notably in the comments by several different posters, not me.
Quote from: VinBucFan on November 13, 2012, 02:34:31 PMQuote from: Biggs3535 on November 13, 2012, 08:51:25 AMQuote from: chace1986 on November 12, 2012, 04:15:15 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on November 12, 2012, 04:09:42 PMQuote from: Biggs3535 on November 12, 2012, 03:44:05 PMWhy do certain people cling to the false premise that the Buccaneers could have only drafted Doug Martin and Lavonte David if they didn't pick Claiborne? There were plenty of ways to get Claiborne, Martin, and David....and what ways would those have been without the 4th round pick we acquired by trading back , dingleberry ?We would have had the '12 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th picks to work with, as well as the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th for '13 to work with. Any combination of those picks could have helped us to jump back into the 1st, and back into the 2nd.Evidently you have to spell things out for the simpletons among us.IRONY DRIPPING ^^^^^^^^ Gotta love when you are appropriately savaged for making a silly comment and then you go back through all the savagery and pick out one quote that you presume supports your earlier statement and quote it and call everyone else simpletons !!!!!!!!. . . all WITHOUT ACKNOWLEDGING THE OBVIOUS FLAW in the argument quoted (even though it was discussed ad nauseum). . . . . . . lol . . . that sheet is better than a tv comedyEven if youre compelled to make the wrong argument, why compund the problem by calling everyone else SIMPLETONS? How about just make your argument and leave it at that? Because you do crap like that all the time, it makes your gaffes all that more hillarious . . .manQuit posting, for chrissakes. None of your crap even makes sense any longer, PeanutButterCheeseBoy.
Quote from: Biggs3535 on November 13, 2012, 08:51:25 AMQuote from: chace1986 on November 12, 2012, 04:15:15 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on November 12, 2012, 04:09:42 PMQuote from: Biggs3535 on November 12, 2012, 03:44:05 PMWhy do certain people cling to the false premise that the Buccaneers could have only drafted Doug Martin and Lavonte David if they didn't pick Claiborne? There were plenty of ways to get Claiborne, Martin, and David....and what ways would those have been without the 4th round pick we acquired by trading back , dingleberry ?We would have had the '12 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th picks to work with, as well as the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th for '13 to work with. Any combination of those picks could have helped us to jump back into the 1st, and back into the 2nd.Evidently you have to spell things out for the simpletons among us.IRONY DRIPPING ^^^^^^^^ Gotta love when you are appropriately savaged for making a silly comment and then you go back through all the savagery and pick out one quote that you presume supports your earlier statement and quote it and call everyone else simpletons !!!!!!!!. . . all WITHOUT ACKNOWLEDGING THE OBVIOUS FLAW in the argument quoted (even though it was discussed ad nauseum). . . . . . . lol . . . that sheet is better than a tv comedyEven if youre compelled to make the wrong argument, why compund the problem by calling everyone else SIMPLETONS? How about just make your argument and leave it at that? Because you do crap like that all the time, it makes your gaffes all that more hillarious . . .man
Quote from: chace1986 on November 12, 2012, 04:15:15 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on November 12, 2012, 04:09:42 PMQuote from: Biggs3535 on November 12, 2012, 03:44:05 PMWhy do certain people cling to the false premise that the Buccaneers could have only drafted Doug Martin and Lavonte David if they didn't pick Claiborne? There were plenty of ways to get Claiborne, Martin, and David....and what ways would those have been without the 4th round pick we acquired by trading back , dingleberry ?We would have had the '12 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th picks to work with, as well as the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th for '13 to work with. Any combination of those picks could have helped us to jump back into the 1st, and back into the 2nd.Evidently you have to spell things out for the simpletons among us.
Quote from: Dolorous Jason on November 12, 2012, 04:09:42 PMQuote from: Biggs3535 on November 12, 2012, 03:44:05 PMWhy do certain people cling to the false premise that the Buccaneers could have only drafted Doug Martin and Lavonte David if they didn't pick Claiborne? There were plenty of ways to get Claiborne, Martin, and David....and what ways would those have been without the 4th round pick we acquired by trading back , dingleberry ?We would have had the '12 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th picks to work with, as well as the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th for '13 to work with. Any combination of those picks could have helped us to jump back into the 1st, and back into the 2nd.
Quote from: Biggs3535 on November 12, 2012, 03:44:05 PMWhy do certain people cling to the false premise that the Buccaneers could have only drafted Doug Martin and Lavonte David if they didn't pick Claiborne? There were plenty of ways to get Claiborne, Martin, and David....and what ways would those have been without the 4th round pick we acquired by trading back , dingleberry ?
Why do certain people cling to the false premise that the Buccaneers could have only drafted Doug Martin and Lavonte David if they didn't pick Claiborne? There were plenty of ways to get Claiborne, Martin, and David.
Biggs is famous (or infamous) for being too scared to show up and square up on a bet. He's just a hot air balloon, all talk Internet bully
I wonder if you even understand the flaw in your original comment about a "false premise" Its all there to read, notably in the comments by several different posters, not me.
Quote from: chace1986 on November 13, 2012, 03:47:54 PMQuote from: VinBucFan on November 13, 2012, 03:00:13 PMQuote from: chace1986 on November 13, 2012, 02:43:39 PMYou two should just f*ck and get it over with...Ha, that Java's style not mine that's for sure. Even Java is out of luck though because Biggs is famous (or infamous) for being too scared to show up and square up on a bet. He's just a hot air balloon, all talk Internet bully -- Java's probably excited nonetheless.Wasn't Freddy the bet welcher?Of course. I won the bet.Quote from: VinBucFan on November 13, 2012, 03:39:42 PMI wonder if you even understand the flaw in your original comment about a "false premise" Its all there to read, notably in the comments by several different posters, not me.The "false premise" is what you have a problem with? Well good gawd, that's exactly what it is. The notion that there would have been no Martin or David if the Bucs had chosen Claiborne is a false premise. It was entirely possible to draft Morris Claiborne, Doug Martin, and Lavonte David.
Thank GOD for Mark Barron!(that was sarcastic, BTW)Bucs could have used Claiborne much more than they could have used Barron, at this point it is not even close in my book.Barron better get his schlit together. He is a rookie, but he was drafted awfully high to be meandering about like Barron Von Clueless out there.