Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
The thought that A. Black wouldn't be a step down from Barron is laughable. Schiano's defense depends upon an excellent SS and the Bucs had the opportunity to draft a guy who'd fit the bill for years to come and did so. Could they have drafted Claiborne at #5? sure but the defense would still be struggling vs. the pass.
I really doubt they could of got, both Martin and David..without that extra 4th..We would of got Martin..but David would of been hard to move back up to get him..It probably have to be 2012 3rd and 2013 2nd pick..I just don't see it happening...
I like A.Black..but he is no M.Barron...are run defense much better..Yes with David, but also M.Barron too..A.Black is not good at the run..M. Barron plays both run and pass, better then any of the young DB's on this team..
I really believe, if we did get Claiborne, are pass D would be about the same..maybe a little bit better, But our run D would be awful...
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
Quote from: geetech84 on November 03, 2012, 11:38:03 AMI really believe, if we did get Claiborne, are pass D would be about the same..maybe a little bit better, But our run D would be awful...I strongly disagree. Out run D has been stout because of the play of our DL and LBs. I still think we could have had David with Claiborne...and if that's true...then the run D would be where it is now.
Quote from: geetech84 on November 03, 2012, 11:38:03 AMI really doubt they could of got, both Martin and David..without that extra 4th..We would of got Martin..but David would of been hard to move back up to get him..It probably have to be 2012 3rd and 2013 2nd pick..I just don't see it happening... I disagree. I don't see why Houston wouldn't have taken our 3rd rd pick in '12, 3rd rd pick in '13 and possibly throw in a 6th from '12 to move up and take David.
Quote from: chace1986 on November 03, 2012, 12:56:19 PMQuote from: geetech84 on November 03, 2012, 11:38:03 AMI really doubt they could of got, both Martin and David..without that extra 4th..We would of got Martin..but David would of been hard to move back up to get him..It probably have to be 2012 3rd and 2013 2nd pick..I just don't see it happening... I disagree. I don't see why Houston wouldn't have taken our 3rd rd pick in '12, 3rd rd pick in '13 and possibly throw in a 6th from '12 to move up and take David.I don't see why the Bucs would. Takes 2 to Tango, complete speculation. Bottom line is the Bucs looked to have scored big in the first 3 rounds of this year's draft. The rest of the draft was very suspect unless Smith or Tandy end up seeing some real playing time. I'd be surprised if Goode does more than someone like Hayward.
Since this thread(sort of) talks about the draft....watching Notre Dame the last few weeks. I'm convinced that Manti Te'o is gonna be an absolute superstar.I know that we have 2 good LBs and rarely use a third, but if he is available when we pick, is he too good of a prospect to pass up?The dude is great in every aspect of the game. Coverage. Open field tackling. Shedding Blocks. Rushing the passer.I think I would compare the situation to when we were on the clock and Adrian Peterson was on the board. We didn't need a RB then, but 2 year later, all of us would say that Peterson would have been an excellent pick.
Quote from: chace1986 on November 03, 2012, 12:56:19 PMQuote from: geetech84 on November 03, 2012, 11:38:03 AMI really believe, if we did get Claiborne, are pass D would be about the same..maybe a little bit better, But our run D would be awful...I strongly disagree. Out run D has been stout because of the play of our DL and LBs. I still think we could have had David with Claiborne...and if that's true...then the run D would be where it is now.Agreed. While Barron has been nice for the run defense, it's not like all the other players are playing exactly like they did last year and he's doing all the clean up work. The entire team is playing differently. Dallas, with Claiborne, has the #13 run defense, allowing a little less than 20 yards more per game than the Bucs.
I still like Barron over Claiborne. Bucs totally hit on their first 3 picks. You have to work hard to complain about this draft.
Moot point on Teo. He will go top 7, maybe top 5. And we won't be drafting that high.