Enter your username and password below to sign in to your PewterReport account.
x close
I'm glad Buc's didn't stay at 5th spot..I doubt we would of got both, Martin and David..Maybe the Buc's thought Claiborne was going be there .. who thought Cowboys was gonna move up and get Claiborne..I think when it happen the Buc's try to move down more but couldn't, so they took Barron, " I believe Barron, going be a good player down the road"Even if the Buc's did in up getting Claiborne,.he wouldn't help out the pass D..with no pass rush..Look at today when Buc's had a pass rush, the secondary look a lot better, but when there wasn't, they got burnt..I'm all for drafting a CB, but I don't think in the 1st..I rather get a pass rush DT. someone who can help inside along, with McCoy...FA next year will be big..I would cut Write and go after 2 CBs..like a Vet. Brent Grimes " i know he is 30 and got hurt, but he still a great player and probably not going to get big top money now, so for a right price, take him away for the falcons" . and I would love the Buc's to go after one of these players too.. CB Derek Cox or Sean Smith
Quote from: Dolorous Jason on December 09, 2012, 08:10:12 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.Nope - Brady would break the cap and we aren't having that for sure. But during the draft the bucs have shown the ability and willingness to move other picks to get where they want to be. There is no real reason to think the past draft would have not been able to keep the 5th overall, and still obtain Martin and David. It would have been a matter of price and willingness.
Quote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.
DJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron?
Actually the problem isnt that Freeman stinks. He is average. He puts up good numbers just often enough to make you think he is better than he is. Bad and great are convincing. But mediocre makes you live with the delusion for too many years. He is just good enough to waste our time and not good enough to get us where we want to go.
Quote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:13:48 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on December 09, 2012, 08:10:12 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.Nope - Brady would break the cap and we aren't having that for sure. But during the draft the bucs have shown the ability and willingness to move other picks to get where they want to be. There is no real reason to think the past draft would have not been able to keep the 5th overall, and still obtain Martin and David. It would have been a matter of price and willingness.Logic and critical thinking don't get past DJs filter. Claiborne could have a HOF career and Doloris would still talk about his wonderlic score.
Quote from: chace1986 on December 09, 2012, 09:49:41 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:13:48 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on December 09, 2012, 08:10:12 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.Nope - Brady would break the cap and we aren't having that for sure. But during the draft the bucs have shown the ability and willingness to move other picks to get where they want to be. There is no real reason to think the past draft would have not been able to keep the 5th overall, and still obtain Martin and David. It would have been a matter of price and willingness.Logic and critical thinking don't get past DJs filter. Claiborne could have a HOF career and Doloris would still talk about his wonderlic score.LOL - I guess we all get our heels dug in from time to time. And AJ - I hope the bucs are keeping an eye on the Eagle corners - wouldn't be surprised if either or both are cut loose, and either would be a huge upgrade to the bucs secondary.
Logic and critical thinking don't get past DJs filter. Claiborne could have a HOF career and Doloris would still talk about his wonderlic score.
Quote from: chace1986 on December 09, 2012, 09:49:41 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:13:48 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on December 09, 2012, 08:10:12 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.Nope - Brady would break the cap and we aren't having that for sure. But during the draft the bucs have shown the ability and willingness to move other picks to get where they want to be. There is no real reason to think the past draft would have not been able to keep the 5th overall, and still obtain Martin and David. It would have been a matter of price and willingness.Logic and critical thinking don't get past DJs filter. Claiborne could have a HOF career and Doloris would still talk about his wonderlic score.SO , are you claiming Claiborne has had a great season ?? Show me the logic and critical thinking skills you've used to deduce this , because it can't be from the amount of yards and TD's he's allowed against him , nor from his lack of stupid penalties.
Quote from: Fire Mark Dummynik on December 10, 2012, 07:28:24 AMQuote from: chace1986 on December 09, 2012, 09:49:41 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:13:48 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on December 09, 2012, 08:10:12 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.Nope - Brady would break the cap and we aren't having that for sure. But during the draft the bucs have shown the ability and willingness to move other picks to get where they want to be. There is no real reason to think the past draft would have not been able to keep the 5th overall, and still obtain Martin and David. It would have been a matter of price and willingness.Logic and critical thinking don't get past DJs filter. Claiborne could have a HOF career and Doloris would still talk about his wonderlic score.SO , are you claiming Claiborne has had a great season ?? Show me the logic and critical thinking skills you've used to deduce this , because it can't be from the amount of yards and TD's he's allowed against him , nor from his lack of stupid penalties. Nope. Never claimed that he was having a great season. It was more of a prediction of how you would react to Claiborne's success. Claiborne has had a better season than Barron. Even though Claiborne might have been just above average for the year, its still better than the crap we get from Barron on a weekly basis.
Quote from: chace1986 on December 10, 2012, 07:43:19 AMQuote from: Fire Mark Dummynik on December 10, 2012, 07:28:24 AMQuote from: chace1986 on December 09, 2012, 09:49:41 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:13:48 PMQuote from: Dolorous Jason on December 09, 2012, 08:10:12 PMQuote from: dbucfan on December 09, 2012, 08:05:58 PMDJ, Are you another who thinks those players only could be obtained if the bucs drafted Barron? COULD they have ? ....sure.... We also COULD have obtained Tom Brady.....can you prove it , and are the odds as good? The answer the is no. There's only 1 way we know it happens for sure and for an acceptable price. To assume it all plays out exactly the same if we stay at #5 is ridiculous.Nope - Brady would break the cap and we aren't having that for sure. But during the draft the bucs have shown the ability and willingness to move other picks to get where they want to be. There is no real reason to think the past draft would have not been able to keep the 5th overall, and still obtain Martin and David. It would have been a matter of price and willingness.Logic and critical thinking don't get past DJs filter. Claiborne could have a HOF career and Doloris would still talk about his wonderlic score.SO , are you claiming Claiborne has had a great season ?? Show me the logic and critical thinking skills you've used to deduce this , because it can't be from the amount of yards and TD's he's allowed against him , nor from his lack of stupid penalties. Nope. Never claimed that he was having a great season. It was more of a prediction of how you would react to Claiborne's success. Claiborne has had a better season than Barron. Even though Claiborne might have been just above average for the year, its still better than the crap we get from Barron on a weekly basis.Doesn't mean a damn thing. Time will tell who the better player is , and it's way too early to judge. I still believe Barron will be a beast in the coming years.The point is : these people who keep bringing up Claiborne at every turn , as if the picking of him would have fixed all our coverage issues , obviously aren't even watching Cowboy games. The guy hasn't exactly been Darelle Reavis. Eric Wright would probably be a better comparison , and we have one of those. Stop bringing his dumb ass up already....
GMC hadn't done much until year 3, now he is a pro bowler.
Quote from: Bucs N Beers on December 29, 2012, 01:45:11 PMGMC hadn't done much until year 3, now he is a pro bowler. Don't you find it a bit strange that he is making the pro bowl? Warren Sapp dominated when he played, so he was an obvious pro bowler. But it seems McCoy is making it only because the competition for the pro bowl is so light these days.